MGV vs. LVHI
MGV (Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF) and LVHI (Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MGV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Mega Cap Value Index, while LVHI is a Volatility Hedged Equity fund tracking the Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Hedged Index-NR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, MGV returned 12.53%/yr vs 15.97%/yr for LVHI. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MGV charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for LVHI.
Performance
MGV vs. LVHI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MGV achieves a 15.50% return, which is significantly higher than LVHI's 13.78% return.
MGV
- 1D
- 0.90%
- 1M
- 4.18%
- YTD
- 15.50%
- 6M
- 15.37%
- 1Y
- 28.69%
- 3Y*
- 18.98%
- 5Y*
- 12.53%
- 10Y*
- 13.15%
LVHI
- 1D
- 0.49%
- 1M
- 0.84%
- YTD
- 13.78%
- 6M
- 14.96%
- 1Y
- 32.13%
- 3Y*
- 21.52%
- 5Y*
- 15.97%
- 10Y*
- —
MGV vs. LVHI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MGV Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF | 15.50% | 15.45% | 16.94% | 9.16% | -1.22% | 25.93% | 2.50% | 25.54% | -4.13% | 16.85% |
LVHI Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 13.78% | 27.12% | 14.81% | 17.45% | 3.84% | 18.19% | -8.76% | 18.35% | -5.22% | 12.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between MGV and LVHI is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 28, 2016 | 0.62 |
The correlation between MGV and LVHI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.
MGV vs. LVHI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MGV
LVHI
Financial Services
Healthcare
Technology
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Utilities
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Financial Services
MGV
LVHI
Healthcare
MGV
LVHI
Technology
MGV
LVHI
Industrials
MGV
LVHI
Consumer Defensive
MGV
LVHI
Energy
MGV
LVHI
Consumer Cyclical
MGV
LVHI
Communication Services
MGV
LVHI
Utilities
MGV
LVHI
Basic Materials
MGV
LVHI
Real Estate
MGV
LVHI
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MGV vs. LVHI — Risk / Return Rank
MGV
LVHI
MGV vs. LVHI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF (MGV) and Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MGV | LVHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.55 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.62 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 1.63 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.36 | 5.23 | -0.87 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.56 | 21.61 | -5.06 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MGV vs. LVHI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MGV drawdown since its inception was -56.07%, which is greater than LVHI's maximum drawdown of -32.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGV and LVHI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MGV | LVHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.07% | -32.31% | -23.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.42% | -6.08% | -0.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.18% | -11.99% | -1.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.54% | -11.99% | -4.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.41% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.78% | -3.51% | -4.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.69% | 1.48% | +0.21% |
Volatility
MGV vs. LVHI - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF (MGV) has a higher volatility of 3.33% compared to Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHI) at 2.78%. This indicates that MGV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LVHI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MGV | LVHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.33% | 2.78% | +0.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.77% | 7.72% | +0.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.13% | 9.60% | +0.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.61% | 11.08% | +2.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.35% | 13.75% | +2.60% |
MGV vs. LVHI - Expense Ratio Comparison
MGV has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than LVHI's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
MGV vs. LVHI - Dividend Comparison
MGV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.85%, less than LVHI's 4.69% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LVHI Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 4.69% | 4.92% | 3.98% | 8.12% | 7.74% | 4.13% | 3.97% | 6.67% | 10.67% | 3.38% | 2.02% | 0.00% |
MGV Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF | 1.85% | 2.04% | 2.31% | 2.48% | 2.45% | 2.17% | 2.47% | 2.69% | 2.65% | 2.34% | 2.53% | 2.59% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MGV and LVHI have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MGV has higher volatility (3.33%) compared to LVHI (2.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MGV dropped -56.07% vs LVHI's -32.31%.
On 5-year performance, LVHI leads with 15.97% vs 12.53% for MGV. On fees, MGV is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, LVHI has been the lower-risk option at 2.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, LVHI has performed better with a 15.97% return vs 12.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MGV is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for LVHI.
LVHI has the higher dividend yield at 4.69%, compared with 1.85% for MGV.
MGV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while LVHI is Volatility Hedged Equity. MGV tracks CRSP US Mega Cap Value Index, while LVHI tracks Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Hedged Index-NR. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for MGV and 0.40% for LVHI.
LVHI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.31 vs 2.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MGV and LVHI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer