MGK vs. XLC
MGK (Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF) and XLC (Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - MGK is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Mega Cap Growth Index, while XLC is a Communications Equities fund tracking the S&P Communication Services Select Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, MGK returned 14.87%/yr vs 8.03%/yr for XLC. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MGK charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for XLC.
Performance
MGK vs. XLC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MGK achieves a 5.33% return, which is significantly higher than XLC's -4.85% return.
MGK
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- -2.06%
- YTD
- 5.33%
- 6M
- 6.21%
- 1Y
- 23.03%
- 3Y*
- 24.17%
- 5Y*
- 14.87%
- 10Y*
- 18.85%
XLC
- 1D
- -0.42%
- 1M
- -4.38%
- YTD
- -4.85%
- 6M
- -3.59%
- 1Y
- 9.07%
- 3Y*
- 21.60%
- 5Y*
- 8.03%
- 10Y*
- —
MGK vs. XLC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MGK Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF | 5.33% | 20.67% | 32.94% | 51.67% | -33.59% | 28.58% | 41.01% | 37.38% | -11.81% |
XLC Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund | -4.85% | 23.08% | 34.71% | 52.82% | -37.63% | 15.96% | 26.90% | 31.05% | -16.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between MGK and XLC is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 19, 2018 | 0.82 |
Over the past year, the correlation between MGK and XLC has dropped to 0.59 - well below their long-term average of 0.82, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
MGK vs. XLC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MGK
XLC
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Industrials
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
-
Technology
MGK
XLC
Communication Services
MGK
XLC
Consumer Cyclical
MGK
XLC
-
Healthcare
MGK
XLC
-
Financial Services
MGK
XLC
-
Real Estate
MGK
XLC
-
Utilities
MGK
XLC
-
Industrials
MGK
XLC
-
Basic Materials
MGK
XLC
-
Consumer Defensive
MGK
XLC
-
Energy
MGK
-
XLC
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MGK vs. XLC — Risk / Return Rank
MGK
XLC
MGK vs. XLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF (MGK) and Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MGK | XLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.68 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.81 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.12 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.37 | 0.86 | +0.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.65 | 2.73 | +1.92 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MGK vs. XLC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MGK drawdown since its inception was -48.43%, roughly equal to the maximum XLC drawdown of -46.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGK and XLC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MGK | XLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.43% | -46.65% | -1.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.85% | -10.57% | -6.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.36% | -17.97% | -5.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.01% | -46.65% | +10.64% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.01% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.63% | -6.72% | +1.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.58% | -10.58% | +3.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.97% | 3.33% | +1.64% |
Volatility
MGK vs. XLC - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF (MGK) has a higher volatility of 5.96% compared to Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLC) at 3.57%. This indicates that MGK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MGK | XLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.96% | 3.57% | +2.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.29% | 9.65% | +3.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.87% | 13.28% | +3.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.72% | 20.68% | +2.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.93% | 22.17% | -0.24% |
MGK vs. XLC - Expense Ratio Comparison
MGK has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than XLC's 0.13% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
MGK vs. XLC - Dividend Comparison
MGK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%, less than XLC's 1.25% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MGK Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF | 0.33% | 0.35% | 0.43% | 0.50% | 0.70% | 0.41% | 0.65% | 0.85% | 1.12% | 1.23% | 1.53% | 1.43% |
XLC Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund | 1.25% | 1.13% | 0.99% | 0.82% | 1.10% | 0.74% | 0.68% | 0.82% | 0.64% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MGK and XLC have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MGK has higher volatility (5.96%) compared to XLC (3.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MGK dropped -48.43% vs XLC's -46.65%.
On 5-year performance, MGK leads with 14.87% vs 8.03% for XLC. On fees, MGK is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, XLC has been the lower-risk option at 3.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, MGK has performed better with a 14.87% return vs 8.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MGK is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.13% for XLC.
XLC has the higher dividend yield at 1.25%, compared with 0.33% for MGK.
MGK is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while XLC is Communications Equities. MGK tracks CRSP US Mega Cap Growth Index, while XLC tracks S&P Communication Services Select Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for MGK and 0.13% for XLC.
MGK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.37 vs 0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MGK and XLC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer