PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MGK vs. WM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MGK vs. WM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF (MGK) and Waste Management, Inc. (WM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MGK achieves a 5.33% return, which is significantly higher than WM's 0.71% return. Over the past 10 years, MGK has outperformed WM with an annualized return of 18.85%, while WM has yielded a comparatively lower 15.36% annualized return.


MGK

1D
0.22%
1M
-2.06%
YTD
5.33%
6M
6.21%
1Y
23.03%
3Y*
24.17%
5Y*
14.87%
10Y*
18.85%

WM

1D
0.30%
1M
1.83%
YTD
0.71%
6M
2.63%
1Y
-5.98%
3Y*
12.33%
5Y*
11.14%
10Y*
15.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MGK vs. WM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MGK
Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF
5.33%20.67%32.94%51.67%-33.59%28.58%41.01%37.38%-2.91%29.49%
WM
Waste Management, Inc.
0.71%10.50%14.28%16.20%-4.49%43.82%5.46%30.45%5.32%24.46%

Correlation

The correlation between MGK and WM is -0.27, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.01

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 27, 2007

0.44

The correlation between MGK and WM shifts across timeframes, from -0.27 (1 year) to 0.44 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MGK vs. WM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MGK
MGK Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
MGK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MGK Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
MGK Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
MGK Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
MGK Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

WM
WM Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
WM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WM Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
WM Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
WM Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
WM Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MGK vs. WM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF (MGK) and Waste Management, Inc. (WM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MGKWMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

0.96

+0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.37

-0.36

+1.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.65

-0.79

+5.44

MGK vs. WM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MGK Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is higher than the WM Sharpe Ratio of -0.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MGK and WM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MGK vs. WM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MGK drawdown since its inception was -48.43%, smaller than the maximum WM drawdown of -77.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGK and WM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MGKWMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.43%

-77.85%

+29.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.85%

-16.70%

-0.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.36%

-18.14%

-5.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.01%

-18.14%

-17.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.01%

-30.07%

-5.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.63%

-10.24%

+4.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.58%

-17.69%

+10.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.97%

7.58%

-2.61%

Volatility

MGK vs. WM - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF (MGK) and Waste Management, Inc. (WM) have volatilities of 5.96% and 6.13%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MGKWMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.96%

6.13%

-0.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.29%

14.08%

-0.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.87%

19.03%

-2.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.72%

18.62%

+4.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.93%

19.54%

+2.39%

Dividends

MGK vs. WM - Dividend Comparison

MGK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%, less than WM's 1.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MGK
Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF
0.33%0.35%0.43%0.50%0.70%0.41%0.65%0.85%1.12%1.23%1.53%1.43%
WM
Waste Management, Inc.
1.61%1.50%1.49%1.56%1.66%1.38%1.85%1.80%2.09%1.97%2.31%2.89%

Frequently Asked Questions


MGK and WM have a correlation of -0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WM has higher volatility (6.13%) compared to MGK (5.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MGK dropped -48.43% vs WM's -77.85%.

MGK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.37 vs -0.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MGK and WM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer