PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MGK vs. VEA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MGK vs. VEA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF (MGK) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MGK achieves a 10.01% return, which is significantly lower than VEA's 14.92% return. Over the past 10 years, MGK has outperformed VEA with an annualized return of 19.24%, while VEA has yielded a comparatively lower 10.17% annualized return.


MGK

1D
-1.13%
1M
7.26%
YTD
10.01%
6M
9.45%
1Y
30.01%
3Y*
26.77%
5Y*
16.25%
10Y*
19.24%

VEA

1D
-0.90%
1M
5.54%
YTD
14.92%
6M
18.15%
1Y
32.48%
3Y*
19.77%
5Y*
9.60%
10Y*
10.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MGK vs. VEA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MGK
Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF
10.01%20.67%32.94%51.67%-33.59%28.58%41.01%37.38%-2.91%29.49%
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
14.92%35.16%3.15%17.93%-15.34%11.66%9.71%22.62%-14.75%26.42%

Correlation

The correlation between MGK and VEA is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 28, 2007

0.75

The correlation between MGK and VEA shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (3 years) to 0.75 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

MGK vs. VEA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MGK
VEA

Technology

56.1%
13.8%

Communication Services

17.3%
3.4%

Consumer Cyclical

12.8%
7.5%

Healthcare

4.5%
8.2%

Financial Services

4.5%
23.3%

Real Estate

1.3%
2.7%

Utilities

1.2%
3.3%

Industrials

1.1%
19.2%

Basic Materials

0.7%
7.5%

Consumer Defensive

0.4%
5.6%

Energy

-

5.4%

Technology

MGK
56.1%
VEA
13.8%

Communication Services

MGK
17.3%
VEA
3.4%

Consumer Cyclical

MGK
12.8%
VEA
7.5%

Healthcare

MGK
4.5%
VEA
8.2%

Financial Services

MGK
4.5%
VEA
23.3%

Real Estate

MGK
1.3%
VEA
2.7%

Utilities

MGK
1.2%
VEA
3.3%

Industrials

MGK
1.1%
VEA
19.2%

Basic Materials

MGK
0.7%
VEA
7.5%

Consumer Defensive

MGK
0.4%
VEA
5.6%

Energy

MGK

-

VEA
5.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MGK vs. VEA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MGK
MGK Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
MGK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MGK Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
MGK Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
MGK Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
MGK Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

VEA
VEA Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
VEA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEA Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
VEA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEA Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MGK vs. VEA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF (MGK) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MGKVEADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.38

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.79

2.81

-1.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.15

10.94

-4.79

MGK vs. VEA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MGK Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is comparable to the VEA Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MGK and VEA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MGKVEADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.86

2.09

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

0.58

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

0.59

+0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.66

0.25

+0.41

Drawdowns

MGK vs. VEA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MGK drawdown since its inception was -47.97%, smaller than the maximum VEA drawdown of -60.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGK and VEA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MGKVEADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.97%

-60.68%

+12.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.85%

-11.63%

-5.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.36%

-13.45%

-9.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.01%

-29.71%

-6.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.01%

-35.73%

-0.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.43%

-0.90%

-0.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.47%

-13.29%

+5.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.89%

2.98%

+1.91%

Volatility

MGK vs. VEA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF (MGK) is 4.01%, while Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) has a volatility of 5.66%. This indicates that MGK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VEA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MGKVEADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.01%

5.66%

-1.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.37%

13.32%

-0.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.23%

15.66%

+0.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.63%

16.55%

+6.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.88%

17.36%

+4.52%

MGK vs. VEA - Expense Ratio Comparison

MGK has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is higher than VEA's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

MGK vs. VEA - Dividend Comparison

MGK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.32%, less than VEA's 2.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MGK
Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF
0.32%0.35%0.43%0.50%0.70%0.41%0.65%0.85%1.12%1.23%1.53%1.43%
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
2.62%3.22%3.35%3.15%2.91%3.16%2.04%3.04%3.35%2.77%3.05%2.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


MGK and VEA have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VEA has higher volatility (5.66%) compared to MGK (4.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MGK dropped -47.97% vs VEA's -60.68%.

On 10-year performance, MGK leads with 19.24% vs 10.17% for VEA. On fees, VEA is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, MGK has been the lower-risk option at 4.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, MGK has performed better with a 19.24% return vs 10.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VEA is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.05% for MGK.

VEA has the higher dividend yield at 2.62%, compared with 0.32% for MGK.

MGK is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while VEA is Foreign Large Cap Equities. MGK tracks CRSP US Mega Cap Growth Index, while VEA tracks FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for MGK and 0.03% for VEA.

VEA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MGK and VEA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer