MGK vs. VEA
MGK (Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF) and VEA (Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MGK is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Mega Cap Growth Index, while VEA is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, MGK returned 19.24%/yr vs 10.17%/yr for VEA. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MGK charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VEA.
Performance
MGK vs. VEA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MGK achieves a 10.01% return, which is significantly lower than VEA's 14.92% return. Over the past 10 years, MGK has outperformed VEA with an annualized return of 19.24%, while VEA has yielded a comparatively lower 10.17% annualized return.
MGK
- 1D
- -1.13%
- 1M
- 7.26%
- YTD
- 10.01%
- 6M
- 9.45%
- 1Y
- 30.01%
- 3Y*
- 26.77%
- 5Y*
- 16.25%
- 10Y*
- 19.24%
VEA
- 1D
- -0.90%
- 1M
- 5.54%
- YTD
- 14.92%
- 6M
- 18.15%
- 1Y
- 32.48%
- 3Y*
- 19.77%
- 5Y*
- 9.60%
- 10Y*
- 10.17%
MGK vs. VEA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MGK Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF | 10.01% | 20.67% | 32.94% | 51.67% | -33.59% | 28.58% | 41.01% | 37.38% | -2.91% | 29.49% |
VEA Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF | 14.92% | 35.16% | 3.15% | 17.93% | -15.34% | 11.66% | 9.71% | 22.62% | -14.75% | 26.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between MGK and VEA is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 28, 2007 | 0.75 |
The correlation between MGK and VEA shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (3 years) to 0.75 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
MGK vs. VEA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MGK
VEA
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Financial Services
Real Estate
Utilities
Industrials
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
-
Technology
MGK
VEA
Communication Services
MGK
VEA
Consumer Cyclical
MGK
VEA
Healthcare
MGK
VEA
Financial Services
MGK
VEA
Real Estate
MGK
VEA
Utilities
MGK
VEA
Industrials
MGK
VEA
Basic Materials
MGK
VEA
Consumer Defensive
MGK
VEA
Energy
MGK
-
VEA
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MGK vs. VEA — Risk / Return Rank
MGK
VEA
MGK vs. VEA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF (MGK) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MGK | VEA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.34 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.38 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.79 | 2.81 | -1.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.15 | 10.94 | -4.79 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MGK | VEA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.86 | 2.09 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 | 0.58 | +0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.88 | 0.59 | +0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.66 | 0.25 | +0.41 |
Drawdowns
MGK vs. VEA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MGK drawdown since its inception was -47.97%, smaller than the maximum VEA drawdown of -60.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGK and VEA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MGK | VEA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.97% | -60.68% | +12.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.85% | -11.63% | -5.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.36% | -13.45% | -9.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.01% | -29.71% | -6.30% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.01% | -35.73% | -0.28% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.43% | -0.90% | -0.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.47% | -13.29% | +5.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.89% | 2.98% | +1.91% |
Volatility
MGK vs. VEA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF (MGK) is 4.01%, while Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) has a volatility of 5.66%. This indicates that MGK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VEA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MGK | VEA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.01% | 5.66% | -1.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.37% | 13.32% | -0.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.23% | 15.66% | +0.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.63% | 16.55% | +6.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.88% | 17.36% | +4.52% |
MGK vs. VEA - Expense Ratio Comparison
MGK has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is higher than VEA's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
MGK vs. VEA - Dividend Comparison
MGK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.32%, less than VEA's 2.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MGK Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF | 0.32% | 0.35% | 0.43% | 0.50% | 0.70% | 0.41% | 0.65% | 0.85% | 1.12% | 1.23% | 1.53% | 1.43% |
VEA Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF | 2.62% | 3.22% | 3.35% | 3.15% | 2.91% | 3.16% | 2.04% | 3.04% | 3.35% | 2.77% | 3.05% | 2.92% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MGK and VEA have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VEA has higher volatility (5.66%) compared to MGK (4.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MGK dropped -47.97% vs VEA's -60.68%.
On 10-year performance, MGK leads with 19.24% vs 10.17% for VEA. On fees, VEA is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, MGK has been the lower-risk option at 4.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, MGK has performed better with a 19.24% return vs 10.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VEA is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.05% for MGK.
VEA has the higher dividend yield at 2.62%, compared with 0.32% for MGK.
MGK is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while VEA is Foreign Large Cap Equities. MGK tracks CRSP US Mega Cap Growth Index, while VEA tracks FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for MGK and 0.03% for VEA.
VEA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MGK and VEA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer