MGC vs. VGT
MGC (Vanguard Mega Cap ETF) and VGT (Vanguard Information Technology ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MGC is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Mega Cap Index, while VGT is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, MGC returned 16.36%/yr vs 25.78%/yr for VGT. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MGC charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for VGT.
Performance
MGC vs. VGT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MGC achieves a 10.80% return, which is significantly lower than VGT's 31.64% return. Over the past 10 years, MGC has underperformed VGT with an annualized return of 16.36%, while VGT has yielded a comparatively higher 25.78% annualized return.
MGC
- 1D
- -0.79%
- 1M
- 5.59%
- YTD
- 10.80%
- 6M
- 10.75%
- 1Y
- 29.68%
- 3Y*
- 23.87%
- 5Y*
- 14.70%
- 10Y*
- 16.36%
VGT
- 1D
- -1.48%
- 1M
- 18.07%
- YTD
- 31.64%
- 6M
- 30.51%
- 1Y
- 60.15%
- 3Y*
- 33.48%
- 5Y*
- 22.23%
- 10Y*
- 25.78%
MGC vs. VGT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MGC Vanguard Mega Cap ETF | 10.80% | 19.31% | 27.16% | 29.77% | -19.95% | 27.58% | 21.57% | 31.14% | -3.45% | 22.61% |
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF | 31.64% | 21.77% | 29.30% | 52.66% | -29.70% | 30.45% | 46.04% | 48.62% | 2.46% | 37.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between MGC and VGT is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 28, 2007 | 0.90 |
The correlation between MGC and VGT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
MGC vs. VGT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MGC
VGT
Technology
Communication Services
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
MGC
VGT
Communication Services
MGC
VGT
Financial Services
MGC
VGT
Consumer Cyclical
MGC
VGT
Healthcare
MGC
VGT
Industrials
MGC
VGT
Consumer Defensive
MGC
VGT
-
Energy
MGC
VGT
Basic Materials
MGC
VGT
Utilities
MGC
VGT
-
Real Estate
MGC
VGT
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MGC vs. VGT — Risk / Return Rank
MGC
VGT
MGC vs. VGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Mega Cap ETF (MGC) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MGC | VGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.42 | 2.95 | -0.52 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.30 | 3.63 | -0.33 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.47 | -0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.03 | 3.69 | -0.66 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.61 | 11.77 | +1.84 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MGC | VGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.42 | 2.95 | -0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 | 0.89 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.90 | 1.05 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.60 | 0.68 | -0.08 |
Drawdowns
MGC vs. VGT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MGC drawdown since its inception was -51.93%, roughly equal to the maximum VGT drawdown of -54.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGC and VGT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MGC | VGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.93% | -54.63% | +2.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.85% | -16.40% | +6.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.28% | -27.23% | +7.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.74% | -35.07% | +9.33% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.07% | -35.07% | +2.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.79% | -1.48% | +0.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.06% | -7.95% | +0.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.19% | 5.13% | -2.94% |
Volatility
MGC vs. VGT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Mega Cap ETF (MGC) is 3.04%, while Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) has a volatility of 6.39%. This indicates that MGC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MGC | VGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.04% | 6.39% | -3.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.27% | 16.07% | -6.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.32% | 20.57% | -8.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.27% | 25.18% | -7.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.21% | 24.60% | -6.39% |
MGC vs. VGT - Expense Ratio Comparison
MGC has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than VGT's 0.09% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
MGC vs. VGT - Dividend Comparison
MGC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%, more than VGT's 0.31% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MGC Vanguard Mega Cap ETF | 0.87% | 0.93% | 1.15% | 1.35% | 1.65% | 1.17% | 1.45% | 1.81% | 2.10% | 1.83% | 2.14% | 2.11% |
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF | 0.31% | 0.40% | 0.60% | 0.65% | 0.91% | 0.64% | 0.82% | 1.11% | 1.29% | 0.99% | 1.31% | 1.28% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MGC and VGT have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VGT has higher volatility (6.39%) compared to MGC (3.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MGC dropped -51.93% vs VGT's -54.63%.
On 10-year performance, VGT leads with 25.78% vs 16.36% for MGC. On fees, MGC is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, MGC has been the lower-risk option at 3.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VGT has performed better with a 25.78% return vs 16.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MGC is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for VGT.
MGC has the higher dividend yield at 0.87%, compared with 0.31% for VGT.
MGC is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while VGT is Technology Equities. MGC tracks CRSP US Mega Cap Index, while VGT tracks MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for MGC and 0.09% for VGT.
VGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.95 vs 2.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MGC and VGT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer