MGC vs. QQQ
MGC (Vanguard Mega Cap ETF) and QQQ (Invesco QQQ ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MGC is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Mega Cap Index, while QQQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, MGC returned 16.51%/yr vs 22.48%/yr for QQQ. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MGC charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for QQQ.
Performance
MGC vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MGC achieves a 9.05% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 20.41% return. Over the past 10 years, MGC has underperformed QQQ with an annualized return of 16.51%, while QQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 22.48% annualized return.
MGC
- 1D
- -0.63%
- 1M
- -0.40%
- YTD
- 9.05%
- 6M
- 8.78%
- 1Y
- 27.57%
- 3Y*
- 22.54%
- 5Y*
- 14.13%
- 10Y*
- 16.51%
QQQ
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- 2.96%
- YTD
- 20.41%
- 6M
- 19.46%
- 1Y
- 40.91%
- 3Y*
- 27.47%
- 5Y*
- 16.94%
- 10Y*
- 22.48%
MGC vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MGC Vanguard Mega Cap ETF | 9.05% | 19.31% | 27.16% | 29.77% | -19.95% | 27.58% | 21.57% | 31.14% | -3.45% | 22.61% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 20.41% | 20.77% | 25.58% | 54.86% | -32.58% | 27.42% | 48.62% | 38.96% | -0.13% | 32.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between MGC and QQQ is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 27, 2007 | 0.91 |
The correlation between MGC and QQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
MGC vs. QQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MGC
QQQ
Technology
Communication Services
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Utilities
Technology
MGC
QQQ
Communication Services
MGC
QQQ
Financial Services
MGC
QQQ
Consumer Cyclical
MGC
QQQ
Healthcare
MGC
QQQ
Industrials
MGC
QQQ
Consumer Defensive
MGC
QQQ
Energy
MGC
QQQ
Basic Materials
MGC
QQQ
Real Estate
MGC
QQQ
Utilities
MGC
QQQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MGC vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank
MGC
QQQ
MGC vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Mega Cap ETF (MGC) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MGC | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.41 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.81 | 3.44 | -0.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.20 | 12.79 | -0.59 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MGC vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MGC drawdown since its inception was -52.26%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGC and QQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MGC | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.26% | -82.97% | +30.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.85% | -11.96% | +2.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.28% | -22.77% | +3.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.74% | -35.12% | +9.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.07% | -35.12% | +2.05% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.36% | -0.99% | -1.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.17% | -32.73% | +25.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.27% | 3.21% | -0.94% |
Volatility
MGC vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Mega Cap ETF (MGC) is 5.00%, while Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) has a volatility of 8.47%. This indicates that MGC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MGC | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.00% | 8.47% | -3.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.23% | 14.20% | -3.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.01% | 17.67% | -4.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.37% | 22.64% | -5.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.27% | 22.43% | -4.16% |
MGC vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
MGC has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
MGC vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison
MGC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%, more than QQQ's 0.49% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MGC Vanguard Mega Cap ETF | 0.88% | 0.93% | 1.15% | 1.35% | 1.65% | 1.17% | 1.45% | 1.81% | 2.10% | 1.83% | 2.14% | 2.11% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 0.41% | 0.45% | 0.56% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.74% | 0.91% | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.99% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, MGC and QQQ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
QQQ has higher volatility (8.47%) compared to MGC (5.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MGC dropped -52.26% vs QQQ's -82.97%.
On 10-year performance, QQQ leads with 22.48% vs 16.51% for MGC. On fees, MGC is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, MGC has been the lower-risk option at 5.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 22.48% return vs 16.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MGC is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for QQQ.
MGC has the higher dividend yield at 0.88%, compared with 0.49% for QQQ.
MGC is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while QQQ is Nasdaq-100. MGC tracks CRSP US Mega Cap Index, while QQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for MGC and 0.18% for QQQ.
QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 2.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MGC and QQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer