PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MGC vs. MGK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MGC vs. MGK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Mega Cap ETF (MGC) and Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF (MGK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MGC achieves a 9.05% return, which is significantly higher than MGK's 5.89% return. Over the past 10 years, MGC has underperformed MGK with an annualized return of 16.51%, while MGK has yielded a comparatively higher 19.23% annualized return.


MGC

1D
-0.63%
1M
-0.40%
YTD
9.05%
6M
8.78%
1Y
27.57%
3Y*
22.54%
5Y*
14.13%
10Y*
16.51%

MGK

1D
-1.39%
1M
-1.85%
YTD
5.89%
6M
5.30%
1Y
25.90%
3Y*
24.22%
5Y*
14.43%
10Y*
19.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MGC vs. MGK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MGC
Vanguard Mega Cap ETF
9.05%19.31%27.16%29.77%-19.95%27.58%21.57%31.14%-3.45%22.61%
MGK
Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF
5.89%20.67%32.94%51.67%-33.59%28.58%41.01%37.38%-2.91%29.49%

Correlation

The correlation between MGC and MGK is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 27, 2007

0.95

The correlation between MGC and MGK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

MGC vs. MGK - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MGC
MGK

Technology

42.9%
59.0%

Communication Services

12.3%
15.8%

Financial Services

10.9%
4.1%

Consumer Cyclical

9.8%
12.2%

Healthcare

8.6%
4.6%

Industrials

6.0%
1.0%

Consumer Defensive

4.4%
0.4%

Energy

2.3%

-

Basic Materials

1.1%
0.6%

Real Estate

0.9%
1.1%

Utilities

0.9%
1.0%

Technology

MGC
42.9%
MGK
59.0%

Communication Services

MGC
12.3%
MGK
15.8%

Financial Services

MGC
10.9%
MGK
4.1%

Consumer Cyclical

MGC
9.8%
MGK
12.2%

Healthcare

MGC
8.6%
MGK
4.6%

Industrials

MGC
6.0%
MGK
1.0%

Consumer Defensive

MGC
4.4%
MGK
0.4%

Energy

MGC
2.3%
MGK

-

Basic Materials

MGC
1.1%
MGK
0.6%

Real Estate

MGC
0.9%
MGK
1.1%

Utilities

MGC
0.9%
MGK
1.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MGC vs. MGK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MGC
MGC Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
MGC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MGC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
MGC Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
MGC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
MGC Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

MGK
MGK Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
MGK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MGK Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
MGK Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
MGK Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
MGK Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MGC vs. MGK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Mega Cap ETF (MGC) and Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF (MGK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MGCMGKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.26

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.81

1.54

+1.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.20

5.19

+7.01

MGC vs. MGK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MGC Sharpe Ratio is 2.13, which is higher than the MGK Sharpe Ratio of 1.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MGC and MGK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MGC vs. MGK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MGC drawdown since its inception was -52.26%, which is greater than MGK's maximum drawdown of -48.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGC and MGK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MGCMGKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.26%

-48.43%

-3.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.85%

-16.85%

+7.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.28%

-23.36%

+4.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.74%

-36.01%

+10.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.07%

-36.01%

+2.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.36%

-5.13%

+2.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.17%

-7.58%

+0.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.27%

5.00%

-2.73%

Volatility

MGC vs. MGK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Mega Cap ETF (MGC) is 5.00%, while Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF (MGK) has a volatility of 6.78%. This indicates that MGC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MGK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MGCMGKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.00%

6.78%

-1.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.23%

13.63%

-3.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.01%

17.22%

-4.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.37%

22.78%

-5.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.27%

21.97%

-3.70%

MGC vs. MGK - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both MGC and MGK have an expense ratio of 0.05%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

MGC vs. MGK - Dividend Comparison

MGC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%, more than MGK's 0.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MGC
Vanguard Mega Cap ETF
0.88%0.93%1.15%1.35%1.65%1.17%1.45%1.81%2.10%1.83%2.14%2.11%
MGK
Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF
0.33%0.35%0.43%0.50%0.70%0.41%0.65%0.85%1.12%1.23%1.53%1.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, MGC and MGK move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

MGK has higher volatility (6.78%) compared to MGC (5.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MGC dropped -52.26% vs MGK's -48.43%.

On 10-year performance, MGK leads with 19.23% vs 16.51% for MGC. Both ETFs have the same 0.05% expense ratio. On volatility, MGC has been the lower-risk option at 5.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, MGK has performed better with a 19.23% return vs 16.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MGC and MGK have the same expense ratio: 0.05% per year.

MGC has the higher dividend yield at 0.88%, compared with 0.33% for MGK.

MGC is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while MGK is Large Cap Growth Equities. MGC tracks CRSP US Mega Cap Index, while MGK tracks CRSP US Mega Cap Growth Index.

MGC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MGC and MGK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer