PortfoliosLab logo
MGC vs. FGRTX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between MGC and FGRTX is 0.95, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

MGC vs. FGRTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Mega Cap ETF (MGC) and Fidelity Mega Cap Stock Fund (FGRTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

200.00%300.00%400.00%500.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
455.54%
205.75%
MGC
FGRTX

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

MGC:

0.57

FGRTX:

0.50

Sortino Ratio

MGC:

0.93

FGRTX:

0.84

Omega Ratio

MGC:

1.14

FGRTX:

1.13

Calmar Ratio

MGC:

0.60

FGRTX:

0.54

Martin Ratio

MGC:

2.26

FGRTX:

2.10

Ulcer Index

MGC:

5.10%

FGRTX:

4.74%

Daily Std Dev

MGC:

20.02%

FGRTX:

19.31%

Max Drawdown

MGC:

-52.20%

FGRTX:

-57.06%

Current Drawdown

MGC:

-8.13%

FGRTX:

-6.09%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MGC achieves a -3.80% return, which is significantly lower than FGRTX's -0.12% return. Over the past 10 years, MGC has outperformed FGRTX with an annualized return of 13.00%, while FGRTX has yielded a comparatively lower 6.15% annualized return.


MGC

YTD

-3.80%

1M

13.81%

6M

-4.50%

1Y

11.42%

5Y*

16.25%

10Y*

13.00%

FGRTX

YTD

-0.12%

1M

15.25%

6M

-2.76%

1Y

9.69%

5Y*

16.26%

10Y*

6.15%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MGC vs. FGRTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MGC has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than FGRTX's 0.61% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

MGC vs. FGRTX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MGC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MGC is 6464
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MGC is 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MGC is 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MGC is 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MGC is 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MGC is 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

FGRTX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FGRTX is 5959
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FGRTX is 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FGRTX is 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FGRTX is 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FGRTX is 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FGRTX is 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

MGC vs. FGRTX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Mega Cap ETF (MGC) and Fidelity Mega Cap Stock Fund (FGRTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current MGC Sharpe Ratio is 0.57, which is comparable to the FGRTX Sharpe Ratio of 0.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MGC and FGRTX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.00December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
0.57
0.50
MGC
FGRTX

Dividends

MGC vs. FGRTX - Dividend Comparison

MGC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.21%, less than FGRTX's 2.68% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
MGC
Vanguard Mega Cap ETF
1.21%1.15%1.35%1.65%1.17%1.45%1.81%2.10%1.83%2.14%2.11%1.81%
FGRTX
Fidelity Mega Cap Stock Fund
2.68%2.68%2.06%4.38%4.79%9.09%12.98%21.72%16.27%1.97%4.07%5.39%

Drawdowns

MGC vs. FGRTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MGC drawdown since its inception was -52.20%, smaller than the maximum FGRTX drawdown of -57.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGC and FGRTX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-8.13%
-6.09%
MGC
FGRTX

Volatility

MGC vs. FGRTX - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Mega Cap ETF (MGC) has a higher volatility of 11.54% compared to Fidelity Mega Cap Stock Fund (FGRTX) at 10.87%. This indicates that MGC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FGRTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
11.54%
10.87%
MGC
FGRTX