MGC vs. MGV
MGC (Vanguard Mega Cap ETF) and MGV (Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MGC is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Mega Cap Index, while MGV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Mega Cap Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, MGC returned 16.51%/yr vs 13.43%/yr for MGV. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.05% expense ratio.
Performance
MGC vs. MGV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MGC achieves a 9.05% return, which is significantly lower than MGV's 16.85% return. Over the past 10 years, MGC has outperformed MGV with an annualized return of 16.51%, while MGV has yielded a comparatively lower 13.43% annualized return.
MGC
- 1D
- -0.63%
- 1M
- -0.40%
- YTD
- 9.05%
- 6M
- 8.78%
- 1Y
- 27.57%
- 3Y*
- 22.54%
- 5Y*
- 14.13%
- 10Y*
- 16.51%
MGV
- 1D
- 1.09%
- 1M
- 4.51%
- YTD
- 16.85%
- 6M
- 16.55%
- 1Y
- 30.47%
- 3Y*
- 19.86%
- 5Y*
- 13.34%
- 10Y*
- 13.43%
MGC vs. MGV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MGC Vanguard Mega Cap ETF | 9.05% | 19.31% | 27.16% | 29.77% | -19.95% | 27.58% | 21.57% | 31.14% | -3.45% | 22.61% |
MGV Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF | 16.85% | 15.45% | 16.94% | 9.16% | -1.22% | 25.93% | 2.50% | 25.54% | -4.13% | 16.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between MGC and MGV is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 27, 2007 | 0.88 |
Over the past year, the correlation between MGC and MGV has dropped to 0.58 - well below their long-term average of 0.88, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
MGC vs. MGV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MGC
MGV
Technology
Communication Services
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Utilities
Technology
MGC
MGV
Communication Services
MGC
MGV
Financial Services
MGC
MGV
Consumer Cyclical
MGC
MGV
Healthcare
MGC
MGV
Industrials
MGC
MGV
Consumer Defensive
MGC
MGV
Energy
MGC
MGV
Basic Materials
MGC
MGV
Real Estate
MGC
MGV
Utilities
MGC
MGV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MGC vs. MGV — Risk / Return Rank
MGC
MGV
MGC vs. MGV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Mega Cap ETF (MGC) and Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF (MGV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MGC | MGV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.89 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.54 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.81 | 4.77 | -1.96 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.20 | 18.12 | -5.92 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MGC vs. MGV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MGC drawdown since its inception was -52.26%, smaller than the maximum MGV drawdown of -56.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGC and MGV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MGC | MGV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.26% | -56.07% | +3.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.85% | -6.42% | -3.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.28% | -13.18% | -6.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.74% | -16.54% | -9.20% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.07% | -35.41% | +2.34% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.36% | 0.00% | -2.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.17% | -7.78% | +0.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.27% | 1.69% | +0.58% |
Volatility
MGC vs. MGV - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Mega Cap ETF (MGC) has a higher volatility of 5.00% compared to Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF (MGV) at 3.32%. This indicates that MGC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MGV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MGC | MGV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.00% | 3.32% | +1.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.23% | 7.77% | +2.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.01% | 10.15% | +2.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.37% | 13.57% | +3.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.27% | 16.36% | +1.91% |
MGC vs. MGV - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both MGC and MGV have an expense ratio of 0.05%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
MGC vs. MGV - Dividend Comparison
MGC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%, less than MGV's 1.82% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MGC Vanguard Mega Cap ETF | 0.88% | 0.93% | 1.15% | 1.35% | 1.65% | 1.17% | 1.45% | 1.81% | 2.10% | 1.83% | 2.14% | 2.11% |
MGV Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF | 1.82% | 2.04% | 2.31% | 2.48% | 2.45% | 2.17% | 2.47% | 2.69% | 2.65% | 2.34% | 2.53% | 2.59% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MGC and MGV have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MGC has higher volatility (5.00%) compared to MGV (3.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MGC dropped -52.26% vs MGV's -56.07%.
On 10-year performance, MGC leads with 16.51% vs 13.43% for MGV. Both ETFs have the same 0.05% expense ratio. On volatility, MGV has been the lower-risk option at 3.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, MGC has performed better with a 16.51% return vs 13.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MGC and MGV have the same expense ratio: 0.05% per year.
MGV has the higher dividend yield at 1.82%, compared with 0.88% for MGC.
MGC is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while MGV is Large Cap Value Equities. MGC tracks CRSP US Mega Cap Index, while MGV tracks CRSP US Mega Cap Value Index.
MGV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.02 vs 2.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MGC and MGV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer