PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MGC vs. MGV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MGC vs. MGV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Mega Cap ETF (MGC) and Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF (MGV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MGC achieves a 9.05% return, which is significantly lower than MGV's 16.85% return. Over the past 10 years, MGC has outperformed MGV with an annualized return of 16.51%, while MGV has yielded a comparatively lower 13.43% annualized return.


MGC

1D
-0.63%
1M
-0.40%
YTD
9.05%
6M
8.78%
1Y
27.57%
3Y*
22.54%
5Y*
14.13%
10Y*
16.51%

MGV

1D
1.09%
1M
4.51%
YTD
16.85%
6M
16.55%
1Y
30.47%
3Y*
19.86%
5Y*
13.34%
10Y*
13.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MGC vs. MGV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MGC
Vanguard Mega Cap ETF
9.05%19.31%27.16%29.77%-19.95%27.58%21.57%31.14%-3.45%22.61%
MGV
Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF
16.85%15.45%16.94%9.16%-1.22%25.93%2.50%25.54%-4.13%16.85%

Correlation

The correlation between MGC and MGV is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 27, 2007

0.88

Over the past year, the correlation between MGC and MGV has dropped to 0.58 - well below their long-term average of 0.88, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

MGC vs. MGV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MGC
MGV

Technology

42.9%
18.5%

Communication Services

12.3%
3.2%

Financial Services

10.9%
22.8%

Consumer Cyclical

9.8%
3.4%

Healthcare

8.6%
16.0%

Industrials

6.0%
13.2%

Consumer Defensive

4.4%
11.0%

Energy

2.3%
6.0%

Basic Materials

1.1%
2.3%

Real Estate

0.9%
1.2%

Utilities

0.9%
2.3%

Technology

MGC
42.9%
MGV
18.5%

Communication Services

MGC
12.3%
MGV
3.2%

Financial Services

MGC
10.9%
MGV
22.8%

Consumer Cyclical

MGC
9.8%
MGV
3.4%

Healthcare

MGC
8.6%
MGV
16.0%

Industrials

MGC
6.0%
MGV
13.2%

Consumer Defensive

MGC
4.4%
MGV
11.0%

Energy

MGC
2.3%
MGV
6.0%

Basic Materials

MGC
1.1%
MGV
2.3%

Real Estate

MGC
0.9%
MGV
1.2%

Utilities

MGC
0.9%
MGV
2.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MGC vs. MGV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MGC
MGC Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
MGC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MGC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
MGC Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
MGC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
MGC Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

MGV
MGV Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
MGV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MGV Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
MGV Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
MGV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
MGV Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MGC vs. MGV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Mega Cap ETF (MGC) and Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF (MGV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MGCMGVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.89

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.54

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.81

4.77

-1.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.20

18.12

-5.92

MGC vs. MGV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MGC Sharpe Ratio is 2.13, which is comparable to the MGV Sharpe Ratio of 3.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MGC and MGV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MGC vs. MGV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MGC drawdown since its inception was -52.26%, smaller than the maximum MGV drawdown of -56.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGC and MGV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MGCMGVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.26%

-56.07%

+3.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.85%

-6.42%

-3.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.28%

-13.18%

-6.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.74%

-16.54%

-9.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.07%

-35.41%

+2.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.36%

0.00%

-2.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.17%

-7.78%

+0.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.27%

1.69%

+0.58%

Volatility

MGC vs. MGV - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Mega Cap ETF (MGC) has a higher volatility of 5.00% compared to Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF (MGV) at 3.32%. This indicates that MGC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MGV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MGCMGVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.00%

3.32%

+1.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.23%

7.77%

+2.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.01%

10.15%

+2.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.37%

13.57%

+3.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.27%

16.36%

+1.91%

MGC vs. MGV - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both MGC and MGV have an expense ratio of 0.05%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

MGC vs. MGV - Dividend Comparison

MGC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%, less than MGV's 1.82% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MGC
Vanguard Mega Cap ETF
0.88%0.93%1.15%1.35%1.65%1.17%1.45%1.81%2.10%1.83%2.14%2.11%
MGV
Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF
1.82%2.04%2.31%2.48%2.45%2.17%2.47%2.69%2.65%2.34%2.53%2.59%

Frequently Asked Questions


MGC and MGV have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MGC has higher volatility (5.00%) compared to MGV (3.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MGC dropped -52.26% vs MGV's -56.07%.

On 10-year performance, MGC leads with 16.51% vs 13.43% for MGV. Both ETFs have the same 0.05% expense ratio. On volatility, MGV has been the lower-risk option at 3.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, MGC has performed better with a 16.51% return vs 13.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MGC and MGV have the same expense ratio: 0.05% per year.

MGV has the higher dividend yield at 1.82%, compared with 0.88% for MGC.

MGC is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while MGV is Large Cap Value Equities. MGC tracks CRSP US Mega Cap Index, while MGV tracks CRSP US Mega Cap Value Index.

MGV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.02 vs 2.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MGC and MGV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer