PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MGC vs. DFAU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MGC vs. DFAU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Mega Cap ETF (MGC) and Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF (DFAU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with MGC having a 10.80% return and DFAU slightly higher at 11.32%.


MGC

1D
-0.79%
1M
5.59%
YTD
10.80%
6M
10.75%
1Y
29.68%
3Y*
23.87%
5Y*
14.70%
10Y*
16.36%

DFAU

1D
-0.67%
1M
4.93%
YTD
11.32%
6M
11.27%
1Y
28.49%
3Y*
21.70%
5Y*
13.05%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MGC vs. DFAU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
MGC
Vanguard Mega Cap ETF
10.80%19.31%27.16%29.77%-19.95%27.58%5.84%
DFAU
Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF
11.32%16.78%23.17%24.79%-16.99%26.89%6.48%

Correlation

The correlation between MGC and DFAU is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2020

0.97

The correlation between MGC and DFAU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

MGC vs. DFAU - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MGC
DFAU

Technology

39.3%
32.7%

Communication Services

13.1%
10.4%

Financial Services

11.7%
12.8%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
10.8%

Healthcare

8.9%
8.5%

Industrials

6.5%
10.4%

Consumer Defensive

4.8%
4.8%

Energy

2.6%
4.6%

Basic Materials

1.2%
2.4%

Utilities

1.0%
2.5%

Real Estate

1.0%
0.2%

Technology

MGC
39.3%
DFAU
32.7%

Communication Services

MGC
13.1%
DFAU
10.4%

Financial Services

MGC
11.7%
DFAU
12.8%

Consumer Cyclical

MGC
10.1%
DFAU
10.8%

Healthcare

MGC
8.9%
DFAU
8.5%

Industrials

MGC
6.5%
DFAU
10.4%

Consumer Defensive

MGC
4.8%
DFAU
4.8%

Energy

MGC
2.6%
DFAU
4.6%

Basic Materials

MGC
1.2%
DFAU
2.4%

Utilities

MGC
1.0%
DFAU
2.5%

Real Estate

MGC
1.0%
DFAU
0.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MGC vs. DFAU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MGC
MGC Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
MGC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MGC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
MGC Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
MGC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
MGC Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

DFAU
DFAU Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
DFAU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFAU Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFAU Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
DFAU Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFAU Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MGC vs. DFAU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Mega Cap ETF (MGC) and Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF (DFAU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MGCDFAUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.43

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.03

3.30

-0.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.61

15.10

-1.49

MGC vs. DFAU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MGC Sharpe Ratio is 2.42, which is comparable to the DFAU Sharpe Ratio of 2.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MGC and DFAU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MGCDFAUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.42

2.38

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

0.77

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.60

0.94

-0.34

Drawdowns

MGC vs. DFAU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MGC drawdown since its inception was -51.93%, which is greater than DFAU's maximum drawdown of -23.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGC and DFAU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MGCDFAUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.93%

-23.61%

-28.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.85%

-8.67%

-1.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.28%

-19.36%

+0.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.74%

-23.61%

-2.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.79%

-0.67%

-0.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.06%

-4.99%

-2.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.19%

1.89%

+0.30%

Volatility

MGC vs. DFAU - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Mega Cap ETF (MGC) and Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF (DFAU) have volatilities of 3.04% and 2.95%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MGCDFAUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.04%

2.95%

+0.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.27%

9.04%

+0.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.32%

12.06%

+0.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.27%

17.02%

+0.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.21%

16.73%

+1.48%

MGC vs. DFAU - Expense Ratio Comparison

MGC has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than DFAU's 0.12% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

MGC vs. DFAU - Dividend Comparison

MGC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%, less than DFAU's 0.90% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFAU
Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF
0.90%0.95%1.10%1.29%1.40%1.00%0.13%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MGC
Vanguard Mega Cap ETF
0.87%0.93%1.15%1.35%1.65%1.17%1.45%1.81%2.10%1.83%2.14%2.11%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, MGC and DFAU move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

MGC has higher volatility (3.04%) compared to DFAU (2.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MGC dropped -51.93% vs DFAU's -23.61%.

On 5-year performance, MGC leads with 14.70% vs 13.05% for DFAU. On fees, MGC is cheaper at 0.05% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, MGC has performed better with a 14.70% return vs 13.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MGC is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for DFAU.

DFAU has the higher dividend yield at 0.90%, compared with 0.87% for MGC.

They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Dimensional. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for MGC and 0.12% for DFAU.

MGC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 2.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MGC and DFAU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer