PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFAU vs. VTI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFAU vs. VTI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF (DFAU) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with DFAU having a 12.07% return and VTI slightly lower at 12.01%.


DFAU

1D
0.31%
1M
5.21%
YTD
12.07%
6M
12.52%
1Y
30.31%
3Y*
21.97%
5Y*
13.38%
10Y*

VTI

1D
0.26%
1M
5.37%
YTD
12.01%
6M
12.40%
1Y
30.01%
3Y*
22.37%
5Y*
13.05%
10Y*
15.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFAU vs. VTI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
DFAU
Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF
12.07%16.78%23.17%24.79%-16.99%26.89%6.48%
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
12.01%17.10%23.81%26.05%-19.52%25.68%6.69%

Correlation

The correlation between DFAU and VTI is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

1.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2020

0.99

The correlation between DFAU and VTI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

DFAU vs. VTI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DFAU
VTI

Technology

32.7%
33.5%

Financial Services

12.8%
12.0%

Consumer Cyclical

10.8%
10.0%

Industrials

10.4%
9.8%

Communication Services

10.4%
10.3%

Healthcare

8.5%
9.2%

Consumer Defensive

4.8%
4.7%

Energy

4.6%
3.7%

Utilities

2.5%
2.3%

Basic Materials

2.4%
2.0%

Real Estate

0.2%
2.4%

Technology

DFAU
32.7%
VTI
33.5%

Financial Services

DFAU
12.8%
VTI
12.0%

Consumer Cyclical

DFAU
10.8%
VTI
10.0%

Industrials

DFAU
10.4%
VTI
9.8%

Communication Services

DFAU
10.4%
VTI
10.3%

Healthcare

DFAU
8.5%
VTI
9.2%

Consumer Defensive

DFAU
4.8%
VTI
4.7%

Energy

DFAU
4.6%
VTI
3.7%

Utilities

DFAU
2.5%
VTI
2.3%

Basic Materials

DFAU
2.4%
VTI
2.0%

Real Estate

DFAU
0.2%
VTI
2.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFAU vs. VTI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFAU
DFAU Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
DFAU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFAU Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFAU Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
DFAU Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFAU Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

VTI
VTI Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
VTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTI Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
VTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTI Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFAU vs. VTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF (DFAU) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DFAUVTIDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.53

2.48

+0.05

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.43

3.37

+0.06

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.45

+0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.56

3.44

+0.12

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

16.33

15.88

+0.45

DFAU vs. VTI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFAU Sharpe Ratio is 2.53, which is comparable to the VTI Sharpe Ratio of 2.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFAU and VTI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DFAUVTIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.53

2.48

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

0.75

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.95

0.51

+0.44

Drawdowns

DFAU vs. VTI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFAU drawdown since its inception was -23.61%, smaller than the maximum VTI drawdown of -55.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFAU and VTI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFAUVTIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.61%

-55.45%

+31.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.67%

-8.92%

+0.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.36%

-19.30%

-0.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.61%

-25.36%

+1.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.99%

-8.03%

+3.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.89%

1.93%

-0.04%

Volatility

DFAU vs. VTI - Volatility Comparison

Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF (DFAU) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) have volatilities of 2.88% and 2.86%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFAUVTIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.88%

2.86%

+0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.02%

9.11%

-0.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.04%

12.15%

-0.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.02%

17.40%

-0.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.74%

18.30%

-1.56%

DFAU vs. VTI - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFAU has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than VTI's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

DFAU vs. VTI - Dividend Comparison

DFAU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%, less than VTI's 1.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFAU
Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF
0.89%0.95%1.10%1.29%1.40%1.00%0.13%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
1.01%1.12%1.27%1.44%1.66%1.21%1.42%1.78%2.04%1.71%1.92%1.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, DFAU and VTI move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

DFAU has higher volatility (2.88%) compared to VTI (2.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFAU dropped -23.61% vs VTI's -55.45%.

On 5-year performance, DFAU leads with 13.38% vs 13.05% for VTI. On fees, VTI is cheaper at 0.03% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, DFAU has performed better with a 13.38% return vs 13.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VTI is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for DFAU.

VTI has the higher dividend yield at 1.01%, compared with 0.89% for DFAU.

They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for DFAU and 0.03% for VTI.

DFAU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 2.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFAU and VTI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer