DFAU vs. RSP
Compare and contrast key facts about Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF (DFAU) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP).
DFAU and RSP are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. DFAU is an actively managed fund by Dimensional. It was launched on Nov 17, 2020. RSP is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Equal Weight Index. It was launched on Apr 24, 2003.
Performance
DFAU vs. RSP - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DFAU vs. RSP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFAU Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF | -3.36% | 16.78% | 23.17% | 24.79% | -16.99% | 26.89% | 6.48% |
RSP Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF | 0.62% | 11.21% | 12.79% | 13.70% | -11.62% | 29.41% | 5.93% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DFAU achieves a -3.36% return, which is significantly lower than RSP's 0.62% return.
DFAU
- 1D
- 2.90%
- 1M
- -4.90%
- YTD
- -3.36%
- 6M
- -0.90%
- 1Y
- 18.61%
- 3Y*
- 17.54%
- 5Y*
- 11.00%
- 10Y*
- —
RSP
- 1D
- 2.05%
- 1M
- -5.97%
- YTD
- 0.62%
- 6M
- 2.01%
- 1Y
- 12.65%
- 3Y*
- 11.72%
- 5Y*
- 7.81%
- 10Y*
- 11.17%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DFAU vs. RSP - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFAU has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than RSP's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
DFAU vs. RSP — Risk / Return Rank
DFAU
RSP
DFAU vs. RSP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF (DFAU) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DFAU | RSP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.01 | 0.74 | +0.27 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.53 | 1.15 | +0.38 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.16 | +0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.54 | 1.08 | +0.46 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.40 | 4.89 | +2.52 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DFAU | RSP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.01 | 0.74 | +0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 | 0.48 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.61 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.79 | 0.55 | +0.24 |
Correlation
The correlation between DFAU and RSP is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
DFAU vs. RSP - Dividend Comparison
DFAU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, less than RSP's 1.62% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFAU Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF | 1.03% | 0.95% | 1.10% | 1.29% | 1.40% | 1.00% | 0.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RSP Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF | 1.62% | 1.64% | 1.52% | 1.64% | 1.82% | 1.28% | 1.64% | 1.69% | 2.02% | 1.52% | 1.20% | 1.70% |
Drawdowns
DFAU vs. RSP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFAU drawdown since its inception was -23.61%, smaller than the maximum RSP drawdown of -59.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFAU and RSP.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFAU | RSP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.61% | -59.92% | +36.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.45% | -12.54% | +0.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.61% | -21.38% | -2.23% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.04% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.03% | -5.97% | -0.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.12% | -6.69% | +1.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.60% | 2.78% | -0.18% |
Volatility
DFAU vs. RSP - Volatility Comparison
Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF (DFAU) has a higher volatility of 5.37% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP) at 4.47%. This indicates that DFAU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RSP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DFAU | RSP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.37% | 4.47% | +0.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.65% | 8.83% | +0.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.51% | 17.17% | +1.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.04% | 16.20% | +0.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.88% | 18.36% | -1.48% |