PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFAU vs. RSP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFAU vs. RSP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF (DFAU) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFAU achieves a 11.17% return, which is significantly lower than RSP's 13.16% return.


DFAU

1D
0.54%
1M
0.47%
6M
9.09%
YTD
11.17%
1Y
22.71%
3Y*
18.70%
5Y*
12.36%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
14.88%

RSP

1D
-0.17%
1M
0.05%
6M
9.43%
YTD
13.16%
1Y
20.39%
3Y*
13.55%
5Y*
8.88%
10Y*
11.94%
ALL TIME*
11.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$27.31M$29.07M$31.61M
$1.86B$1.85B$2.06B

DFAU vs. RSP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
DFAU
Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF
11.17%16.78%23.17%24.79%-16.99%26.89%4.87%
RSP
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF
13.16%11.21%12.79%13.70%-11.62%29.41%4.67%

Correlation

The correlation between DFAU and RSP is 0.75, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2020

0.90

The correlation between DFAU and RSP shifts across timeframes, from 0.75 (1 year) to 0.90 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

DFAU vs. RSP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DFAU
RSP

Technology

39.8%
16.9%

Financial Services

14.2%
14.8%

Consumer Cyclical

10.4%
9.5%

Industrials

9.0%
14.6%

Communication Services

7.4%
3.3%

Healthcare

7.4%
11.8%

Consumer Defensive

3.9%
6.2%

Energy

3.2%
4.2%

Utilities

2.4%
6.6%

Basic Materials

2.2%
4.6%

Real Estate

0.2%
6.0%

Technology

DFAU
39.8%
RSP
16.9%

Financial Services

DFAU
14.2%
RSP
14.8%

Consumer Cyclical

DFAU
10.4%
RSP
9.5%

Industrials

DFAU
9.0%
RSP
14.6%

Communication Services

DFAU
7.4%
RSP
3.3%

Healthcare

DFAU
7.4%
RSP
11.8%

Consumer Defensive

DFAU
3.9%
RSP
6.2%

Energy

DFAU
3.2%
RSP
4.2%

Utilities

DFAU
2.4%
RSP
6.6%

Basic Materials

DFAU
2.2%
RSP
4.6%

Real Estate

DFAU
0.2%
RSP
6.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFAU vs. RSP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DFAU
DFAU Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
DFAU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFAU Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFAU Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
DFAU Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFAU Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

RSP
RSP Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
RSP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSP Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSP Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
RSP Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSP Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DFAU vs. RSP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF (DFAU) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DFAURSPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.29

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.39

2.43

-0.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.37

9.43

+0.93

DFAU vs. RSP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFAU Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is comparable to the RSP Sharpe Ratio of 1.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFAU and RSP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DFAU vs. RSP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFAU drawdown since its inception was -23.61%, smaller than the maximum RSP drawdown of -59.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFAU and RSP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFAURSPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.61%

-59.92%

+36.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.67%

-7.85%

-0.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.36%

-17.81%

-1.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.61%

-21.38%

-2.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.80%

-1.23%

+0.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.89%

-6.61%

+1.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.00%

2.02%

-0.02%

Volatility

DFAU vs. RSP - Volatility Comparison

Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF (DFAU) has a higher volatility of 3.40% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP) at 2.88%. This indicates that DFAU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RSP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFAURSPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.40%

2.88%

+0.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.06%

8.59%

+1.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.94%

11.76%

+1.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.11%

16.16%

+0.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.68%

18.28%

-1.60%

DFAU vs. RSP - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFAU has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than RSP's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

DFAU vs. RSP - Dividend Comparison

DFAU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%, less than RSP's 1.49% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFAU
Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF
0.91%0.95%1.10%1.29%1.40%1.00%0.13%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RSP
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF
1.49%1.64%1.52%1.64%1.82%1.28%1.64%1.69%2.02%1.52%1.20%1.70%

Frequently Asked Questions


DFAU and RSP have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DFAU has higher volatility (3.40%) compared to RSP (2.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFAU dropped -23.61% vs RSP's -59.92%.

On 5-year performance, DFAU leads with 12.36% vs 8.88% for RSP. On fees, DFAU is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, RSP has been the lower-risk option at 2.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, DFAU has performed better with a 12.36% return vs 8.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DFAU is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for RSP.

RSP has the higher dividend yield at 1.49%, compared with 0.91% for DFAU.

DFAU is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while RSP is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for DFAU and 0.20% for RSP.

RSP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.63 vs 1.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFAU and RSP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer