DFAU vs. AVUS
DFAU (Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF) and AVUS (Avantis U.S. Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DFAU is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Dimensional, while AVUS is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by American Century. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, DFAU returned 13.38%/yr vs 13.29%/yr for AVUS. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. DFAU charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for AVUS.
Performance
DFAU vs. AVUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DFAU achieves a 12.07% return, which is significantly lower than AVUS's 14.95% return.
DFAU
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- 5.21%
- YTD
- 12.07%
- 6M
- 12.52%
- 1Y
- 30.31%
- 3Y*
- 21.97%
- 5Y*
- 13.38%
- 10Y*
- —
AVUS
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- 4.82%
- YTD
- 14.95%
- 6M
- 15.91%
- 1Y
- 34.03%
- 3Y*
- 22.54%
- 5Y*
- 13.29%
- 10Y*
- —
DFAU vs. AVUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFAU Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF | 12.07% | 16.78% | 23.17% | 24.79% | -16.99% | 26.89% | 6.48% |
AVUS Avantis U.S. Equity ETF | 14.95% | 16.68% | 20.43% | 21.77% | -13.82% | 28.73% | 6.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between DFAU and AVUS is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2020 | 0.98 |
The correlation between DFAU and AVUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.
DFAU vs. AVUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DFAU
AVUS
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Technology
DFAU
AVUS
Financial Services
DFAU
AVUS
Consumer Cyclical
DFAU
AVUS
Industrials
DFAU
AVUS
Communication Services
DFAU
AVUS
Healthcare
DFAU
AVUS
Consumer Defensive
DFAU
AVUS
Energy
DFAU
AVUS
Utilities
DFAU
AVUS
Basic Materials
DFAU
AVUS
Real Estate
DFAU
AVUS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DFAU vs. AVUS — Risk / Return Rank
DFAU
AVUS
DFAU vs. AVUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF (DFAU) and Avantis U.S. Equity ETF (AVUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DFAU | AVUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.53 | 2.82 | -0.29 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.43 | 3.83 | -0.39 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.51 | -0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.56 | 4.41 | -0.84 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.33 | 20.10 | -3.77 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DFAU | AVUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.53 | 2.82 | -0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 | 0.77 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.95 | 0.80 | +0.15 |
Drawdowns
DFAU vs. AVUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFAU drawdown since its inception was -23.61%, smaller than the maximum AVUS drawdown of -37.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFAU and AVUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFAU | AVUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.61% | -37.04% | +13.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.67% | -7.85% | -0.82% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.36% | -19.74% | +0.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.61% | -22.19% | -1.42% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.99% | -5.09% | +0.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.89% | 1.72% | +0.17% |
Volatility
DFAU vs. AVUS - Volatility Comparison
Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF (DFAU) and Avantis U.S. Equity ETF (AVUS) have volatilities of 2.88% and 2.97%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DFAU | AVUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.88% | 2.97% | -0.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.02% | 8.99% | +0.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.04% | 12.14% | -0.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.02% | 17.29% | -0.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.74% | 20.85% | -4.11% |
DFAU vs. AVUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFAU has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than AVUS's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
DFAU vs. AVUS - Dividend Comparison
DFAU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%, less than AVUS's 0.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVUS Avantis U.S. Equity ETF | 0.90% | 1.08% | 1.27% | 1.41% | 1.59% | 1.08% | 1.19% | 0.35% |
DFAU Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF | 0.89% | 0.95% | 1.10% | 1.29% | 1.40% | 1.00% | 0.13% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.98, DFAU and AVUS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
AVUS has higher volatility (2.97%) compared to DFAU (2.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFAU dropped -23.61% vs AVUS's -37.04%.
On 5-year performance, DFAU leads with 13.38% vs 13.29% for AVUS. On fees, DFAU is cheaper at 0.12% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, DFAU has performed better with a 13.38% return vs 13.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DFAU is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for AVUS.
DFAU and AVUS have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.89%.
DFAU is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while AVUS is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and American Century. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for DFAU and 0.15% for AVUS.
AVUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.82 vs 2.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DFAU and AVUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer