MFVL vs. TMFC

Last updated Jul 12, 2026

MFVL (Motley Fool Value Factor ETF) and TMFC (Motley Fool 100 Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MFVL is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Motley Fool, while TMFC is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Motley Fool 100 Index. MFVL is actively managed, while TMFC is passively managed. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.50% expense ratio.

Performance

MFVL vs. TMFC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Motley Fool Value Factor ETF (MFVL) and Motley Fool 100 Index ETF (TMFC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MFVL achieves a 1.60% return, which is significantly lower than TMFC's 8.36% return.

MFVL

• 1D: 0.55%
• 1M: 1.89%
• 6M: -0.41%
• YTD: 1.60%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

TMFC

• 1D: 0.41%
• 1M: 2.91%
• 6M: 7.27%
• YTD: 8.36%
• 1Y: 20.88%
• 3Y*: 24.61%
• 5Y*: 14.18%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MFVL vs. TMFC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
MFVL Motley Fool Value Factor ETF	1.60%	1.22%
TMFC Motley Fool 100 Index ETF	8.36%	-0.42%

Correlation

The correlation between MFVL and TMFC is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2025	0.45

Return for Risk

MFVL vs. TMFC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MFVL

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

TMFC

TMFC Risk / Return Rank: 47
TMFC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
TMFC Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
TMFC Omega Ratio Rank: 49
TMFC Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
TMFC Martin Ratio Rank: 43

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MFVL vs. TMFC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Motley Fool Value Factor ETF (MFVL) and Motley Fool 100 Index ETF (TMFC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MFVL	TMFC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.44	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.00	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.25	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	1.62	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	5.72	—

Drawdowns

MFVL vs. TMFC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MFVL drawdown since its inception was -7.03%, smaller than the maximum TMFC drawdown of -33.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFVL and TMFC.

Drawdown Indicators

	MFVL	TMFC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-7.03%	-33.06%	+26.03%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-12.64%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-20.06%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-33.06%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.12%	-1.18%	-0.94%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.67%	-6.73%	+4.06%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.58%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	MFVL	TMFC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	5.19%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	11.41%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.64%	14.29%	-1.65%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.64%	20.50%	-7.86%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.64%	21.96%	-9.32%

MFVL vs. TMFC - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both MFVL and TMFC have an expense ratio of 0.50%.

Dividends

MFVL vs. TMFC - Dividend Comparison

MFVL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TMFC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
MFVL Motley Fool Value Factor ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TMFC Motley Fool 100 Index ETF	0.13%	0.14%	0.40%	0.26%	0.27%	0.23%	0.42%	0.50%	0.61%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MFVL and TMFC in my portfolio?

MFVL and TMFC have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, MFVL or TMFC?

Both ETFs have the same 0.50% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, MFVL or TMFC?

MFVL and TMFC have the same expense ratio: 0.50% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MFVL or TMFC?

TMFC has the higher dividend yield at 0.13%, compared with 0.00% for MFVL.

What is the main difference between MFVL and TMFC?

MFVL is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while TMFC is Large Cap Growth Equities.