METU vs. TMF

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

METU (Direxion Daily META Bull 2X ETF) and TMF (Direxion Daily 20-Year Treasury Bull 3X) are both exchange-traded funds - METU is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Direxion, while TMF is a Leveraged Bonds fund tracking the NYSE 20 Year Plus Treasury Bond Index (300%). METU is actively managed, while TMF is passively managed. Over the past year, METU returned -30.67% vs 0.90% for TMF. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. METU charges 1.07%/yr vs 1.09%/yr for TMF.

Performance

METU vs. TMF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily META Bull 2X ETF (METU) and Direxion Daily 20-Year Treasury Bull 3X (TMF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, METU achieves a -20.23% return, which is significantly lower than TMF's -6.13% return.

METU

• 1D: 8.31%
• 1M: 2.33%
• YTD: -20.23%
• 6M: -15.96%
• 1Y: -30.67%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

TMF

• 1D: -1.14%
• 1M: 1.22%
• YTD: -6.13%
• 6M: -11.63%
• 1Y: 0.90%
• 3Y*: -20.78%
• 5Y*: -30.52%
• 10Y*: -16.56%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

METU vs. TMF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
METU Direxion Daily META Bull 2X ETF	-20.23%	-1.01%	25.56%
TMF Direxion Daily 20-Year Treasury Bull 3X	-6.13%	-2.94%	-21.05%

Correlation

The correlation between METU and TMF is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.08
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2024	0.01

METU vs. TMF - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	METU	TMF
Communication Services	100.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	18.7%
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

METU vs. TMF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

METU

METU Risk / Return Rank: 5
METU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
METU Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
METU Omega Ratio Rank: 6
METU Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
METU Martin Ratio Rank: 4

TMF

TMF Risk / Return Rank: 9
TMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
TMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
TMF Omega Ratio Rank: 9
TMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
TMF Martin Ratio Rank: 9

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

METU vs. TMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily META Bull 2X ETF (METU) and Direxion Daily 20-Year Treasury Bull 3X (TMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	METU	TMF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.44	0.03	-0.47
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.24	0.25	-0.50
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.97	1.03	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.50	0.03	-0.53
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.92	0.08	-1.00
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

METU vs. TMF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current METU Sharpe Ratio is -0.44, which is lower than the TMF Sharpe Ratio of 0.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of METU and TMF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	METU	TMF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.44	0.03	-0.47
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.66	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	-0.38	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.01	-0.14	+0.13

Drawdowns

METU vs. TMF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum METU drawdown since its inception was -61.85%, smaller than the maximum TMF drawdown of -92.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for METU and TMF.

Drawdown Indicators

	METU	TMF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-61.85%	-92.89%	+31.04%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-61.52%	-26.51%	-35.01%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-56.31%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-88.81%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-92.89%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-49.01%	-92.23%	+43.22%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-23.55%	-43.63%	+20.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	33.23%	11.49%	+21.74%

Volatility

METU vs. TMF - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily META Bull 2X ETF (METU) has a higher volatility of 17.56% compared to Direxion Daily 20-Year Treasury Bull 3X (TMF) at 8.09%. This indicates that METU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	METU	TMF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	17.56%	8.09%	+9.47%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	53.29%	19.01%	+34.28%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	70.38%	28.76%	+41.62%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	72.35%	46.75%	+25.60%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	72.35%	43.92%	+28.43%

METU vs. TMF - Expense Ratio Comparison

METU has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is lower than TMF's 1.09% expense ratio.

Dividends

METU vs. TMF - Dividend Comparison

METU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.87%, less than TMF's 4.15% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
METU Direxion Daily META Bull 2X ETF	3.87%	3.00%	1.40%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TMF Direxion Daily 20-Year Treasury Bull 3X	4.15%	4.06%	4.29%	2.82%	1.62%	0.13%	2.23%	0.94%	1.49%	0.41%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both METU and TMF in my portfolio?

METU and TMF have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, METU or TMF?

METU has higher volatility (17.56%) compared to TMF (8.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, METU dropped -61.85% vs TMF's -92.89%.

Which ETF is better, METU or TMF?

On 1-year performance, TMF leads with 0.90% vs -30.67% for METU. On fees, METU is cheaper at 1.07% per year. On volatility, TMF has been the lower-risk option at 8.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, METU or TMF?

Over the 1-year period, TMF has performed better with a 0.90% return vs -30.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, METU or TMF?

METU is cheaper with a 1.07% expense ratio, compared with 1.09% for TMF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, METU or TMF?

TMF has the higher dividend yield at 4.15%, compared with 3.87% for METU.

What is the main difference between METU and TMF?

METU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while TMF is Leveraged Bonds. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for METU and 1.09% for TMF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TMF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.03 vs -0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.