METU vs. UGL

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

METU (Direxion Daily META Bull 2X ETF) and UGL (ProShares Ultra Gold) are both exchange-traded funds - METU is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Direxion, while UGL is a Leveraged Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Gold Subindex (200%). METU is actively managed, while UGL is passively managed. Over the past year, METU returned -34.95% vs 21.38% for UGL. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. METU charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for UGL.

Performance

METU vs. UGL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily META Bull 2X ETF (METU) and ProShares Ultra Gold (UGL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, METU achieves a -14.71% return, which is significantly higher than UGL's -21.87% return.

METU

• 1D: -3.71%
• 1M: 30.05%
• 6M: -9.56%
• YTD: -14.71%
• 1Y: -34.95%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

UGL

• 1D: -5.20%
• 1M: -10.54%
• 6M: -30.93%
• YTD: -21.87%
• 1Y: 21.38%
• 3Y*: 42.32%
• 5Y*: 23.26%
• 10Y*: 14.39%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

METU vs. UGL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
METU Direxion Daily META Bull 2X ETF	-14.71%	-1.01%	28.79%
UGL ProShares Ultra Gold	-21.87%	137.57%	20.28%

Correlation

The correlation between METU and UGL is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.13
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2024	0.06

Return for Risk

METU vs. UGL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

METU

METU Risk / Return Rank: 5
METU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
METU Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
METU Omega Ratio Rank: 6
METU Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
METU Martin Ratio Rank: 5

UGL

UGL Risk / Return Rank: 17
UGL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
UGL Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
UGL Omega Ratio Rank: 21
UGL Calmar Ratio Rank: 15
UGL Martin Ratio Rank: 15

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

METU vs. UGL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily META Bull 2X ETF (METU) and ProShares Ultra Gold (UGL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	METU	UGL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.46	0.39	-0.84
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.26	0.84	-1.10
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.97	1.12	-0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.57	0.43	-1.00
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.93	0.99	-1.92

METU vs. UGL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current METU Sharpe Ratio is -0.46, which is lower than the UGL Sharpe Ratio of 0.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of METU and UGL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

METU vs. UGL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum METU drawdown since its inception was -61.86%, smaller than the maximum UGL drawdown of -75.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for METU and UGL.

Drawdown Indicators

	METU	UGL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-61.86%	-75.93%	+14.07%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-61.54%	-49.38%	-12.16%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-49.38%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-49.38%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-49.38%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-45.48%	-49.33%	+3.85%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-25.06%	-43.63%	+18.57%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	37.56%	21.73%	+15.83%

Volatility

METU vs. UGL - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily META Bull 2X ETF (METU) has a higher volatility of 31.56% compared to ProShares Ultra Gold (UGL) at 15.14%. This indicates that METU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UGL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	METU	UGL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	31.56%	15.14%	+16.42%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	61.87%	48.71%	+13.16%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	76.94%	55.56%	+21.38%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	74.41%	36.94%	+37.47%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	74.41%	32.63%	+41.78%

METU vs. UGL - Expense Ratio Comparison

METU has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than UGL's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

METU vs. UGL - Dividend Comparison

METU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.25%, while UGL has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
METU Direxion Daily META Bull 2X ETF	3.25%	3.00%	1.40%
UGL ProShares Ultra Gold	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both METU and UGL in my portfolio?

METU and UGL have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, METU or UGL?

METU has higher volatility (31.56%) compared to UGL (15.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, METU dropped -61.86% vs UGL's -75.93%.

Which ETF is better, METU or UGL?

On 1-year performance, UGL leads with 21.38% vs -34.95% for METU. On fees, UGL is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, UGL has been the lower-risk option at 15.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, METU or UGL?

Over the 1-year period, UGL has performed better with a 21.38% return vs -34.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, METU or UGL?

UGL is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for METU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, METU or UGL?

METU has the higher dividend yield at 3.25%, compared with 0.00% for UGL.

What is the main difference between METU and UGL?

METU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while UGL is Leveraged Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for METU and 0.95% for UGL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

UGL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.39 vs -0.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.