PortfoliosLab logo
METU vs. FBL
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between METU and FBL is 0.59, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

METU vs. FBL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily META Bull 2X ETF (METU) and GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF (FBL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-20.00%0.00%20.00%40.00%60.00%80.00%100.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
14.54%
16.82%
METU
FBL

Key characteristics

Daily Std Dev

METU:

73.95%

FBL:

72.01%

Max Drawdown

METU:

-60.05%

FBL:

-59.80%

Current Drawdown

METU:

-41.10%

FBL:

-40.71%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, METU achieves a -8.78% return, which is significantly lower than FBL's -8.06% return.


METU

YTD

-8.78%

1M

-0.40%

6M

-12.14%

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

FBL

YTD

-8.06%

1M

0.40%

6M

-10.84%

1Y

25.21%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


METU vs. FBL - Expense Ratio Comparison

METU has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is lower than FBL's 1.15% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

METU vs. FBL — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

METU

FBL
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FBL is 5858
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FBL is 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FBL is 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FBL is 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FBL is 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FBL is 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

METU vs. FBL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily META Bull 2X ETF (METU) and GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF (FBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.



Chart placeholderNot enough data

Dividends

METU vs. FBL - Dividend Comparison

METU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.12%, while FBL has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20242023
METU
Direxion Daily META Bull 2X ETF
2.12%1.40%0.00%
FBL
GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF
0.00%0.00%51.58%

Drawdowns

METU vs. FBL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum METU drawdown since its inception was -60.05%, roughly equal to the maximum FBL drawdown of -59.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for METU and FBL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-41.10%
-40.71%
METU
FBL

Volatility

METU vs. FBL - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily META Bull 2X ETF (METU) and GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF (FBL) have volatilities of 26.90% and 26.53%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
26.90%
26.53%
METU
FBL