METU vs. VOO
METU (Direxion Daily META Bull 2X ETF) and VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - METU is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Direxion, while VOO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. METU is actively managed, while VOO is passively managed. Over the past year, METU returned -30.67% vs 28.04% for VOO. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. METU charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VOO.
Performance
METU vs. VOO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, METU achieves a -20.23% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 10.91% return.
METU
- 1D
- 8.31%
- 1M
- 2.33%
- YTD
- -20.23%
- 6M
- -15.96%
- 1Y
- -30.67%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VOO
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 5.04%
- YTD
- 10.91%
- 6M
- 10.93%
- 1Y
- 28.04%
- 3Y*
- 22.44%
- 5Y*
- 13.90%
- 10Y*
- 15.56%
METU vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
METU Direxion Daily META Bull 2X ETF | -20.23% | -1.01% | 25.56% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 10.91% | 17.82% | 10.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between METU and VOO is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2024 | 0.57 |
The correlation between METU and VOO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.
METU vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
METU
VOO
Communication Services
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Communication Services
METU
VOO
Basic Materials
METU
-
VOO
Consumer Cyclical
METU
-
VOO
Consumer Defensive
METU
-
VOO
Energy
METU
-
VOO
Financial Services
METU
-
VOO
Healthcare
METU
-
VOO
Industrials
METU
-
VOO
Real Estate
METU
-
VOO
Technology
METU
-
VOO
Utilities
METU
-
VOO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
METU vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank
METU
VOO
METU vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily META Bull 2X ETF (METU) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| METU | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.83 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 1.43 | -0.46 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.50 | 3.16 | -3.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.92 | 14.73 | -15.65 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| METU | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.44 | 2.39 | -2.83 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.83 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.87 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.01 | 0.89 | -0.89 |
Drawdowns
METU vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum METU drawdown since its inception was -61.85%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for METU and VOO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| METU | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.85% | -33.99% | -27.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -61.52% | -8.90% | -52.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -18.69% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.52% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.99% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -49.01% | -0.70% | -48.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.55% | -3.69% | -19.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 33.23% | 1.91% | +31.32% |
Volatility
METU vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily META Bull 2X ETF (METU) has a higher volatility of 17.56% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 2.84%. This indicates that METU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| METU | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.56% | 2.84% | +14.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 53.29% | 8.90% | +44.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 70.38% | 11.80% | +58.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 72.35% | 16.81% | +55.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 72.35% | 18.01% | +54.34% |
METU vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
METU has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
METU vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison
METU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.87%, more than VOO's 1.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
METU Direxion Daily META Bull 2X ETF | 3.87% | 3.00% | 1.40% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.03% | 1.13% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
METU and VOO have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
METU has higher volatility (17.56%) compared to VOO (2.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, METU dropped -61.85% vs VOO's -33.99%.
On 1-year performance, VOO leads with 28.04% vs -30.67% for METU. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VOO has been the lower-risk option at 2.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, VOO has performed better with a 28.04% return vs -30.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for METU.
METU has the higher dividend yield at 3.87%, compared with 1.03% for VOO.
METU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while VOO is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for METU and 0.03% for VOO.
VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs -0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for METU and VOO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer