PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
METU vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

METU vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily META Bull 2X ETF (METU) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, METU achieves a -20.23% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 10.91% return.


METU

1D
8.31%
1M
2.33%
YTD
-20.23%
6M
-15.96%
1Y
-30.67%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

VOO

1D
-0.70%
1M
5.04%
YTD
10.91%
6M
10.93%
1Y
28.04%
3Y*
22.44%
5Y*
13.90%
10Y*
15.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

METU vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
METU
Direxion Daily META Bull 2X ETF
-20.23%-1.01%25.56%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
10.91%17.82%10.70%

Correlation

The correlation between METU and VOO is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2024

0.57

The correlation between METU and VOO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.

METU vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
METU
VOO

Communication Services

100.0%
11.3%

Basic Materials

-

1.8%

Consumer Cyclical

-

10.2%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.9%

Energy

-

3.5%

Financial Services

-

11.6%

Healthcare

-

8.5%

Industrials

-

8.3%

Real Estate

-

1.9%

Technology

-

35.7%

Utilities

-

2.4%

Communication Services

METU
100.0%
VOO
11.3%

Basic Materials

METU

-

VOO
1.8%

Consumer Cyclical

METU

-

VOO
10.2%

Consumer Defensive

METU

-

VOO
4.9%

Energy

METU

-

VOO
3.5%

Financial Services

METU

-

VOO
11.6%

Healthcare

METU

-

VOO
8.5%

Industrials

METU

-

VOO
8.3%

Real Estate

METU

-

VOO
1.9%

Technology

METU

-

VOO
35.7%

Utilities

METU

-

VOO
2.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

METU vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

METU
METU Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
METU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
METU Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
METU Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
METU Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
METU Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

METU vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily META Bull 2X ETF (METU) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


METUVOODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.83

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.97

1.43

-0.46

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.50

3.16

-3.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.92

14.73

-15.65

METU vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current METU Sharpe Ratio is -0.44, which is lower than the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of METU and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


METUVOODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.44

2.39

-2.83

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.01

0.89

-0.89

Drawdowns

METU vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum METU drawdown since its inception was -61.85%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for METU and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


METUVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.85%

-33.99%

-27.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-61.52%

-8.90%

-52.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-49.01%

-0.70%

-48.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.55%

-3.69%

-19.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

33.23%

1.91%

+31.32%

Volatility

METU vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily META Bull 2X ETF (METU) has a higher volatility of 17.56% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 2.84%. This indicates that METU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


METUVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.56%

2.84%

+14.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

53.29%

8.90%

+44.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

70.38%

11.80%

+58.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

72.35%

16.81%

+55.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

72.35%

18.01%

+54.34%

METU vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

METU has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

METU vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

METU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.87%, more than VOO's 1.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
METU
Direxion Daily META Bull 2X ETF
3.87%3.00%1.40%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.03%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


METU and VOO have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

METU has higher volatility (17.56%) compared to VOO (2.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, METU dropped -61.85% vs VOO's -33.99%.

On 1-year performance, VOO leads with 28.04% vs -30.67% for METU. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VOO has been the lower-risk option at 2.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, VOO has performed better with a 28.04% return vs -30.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for METU.

METU has the higher dividend yield at 3.87%, compared with 1.03% for VOO.

METU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while VOO is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for METU and 0.03% for VOO.

VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs -0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for METU and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer