METU vs. QLD

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

METU (Direxion Daily META Bull 2X ETF) and QLD (ProShares Ultra QQQ) are both Leveraged Equities funds. METU is actively managed, while QLD is passively managed. Over the past year, METU returned -57.12% vs 42.18% for QLD. Their 0.59 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. METU charges 1.02%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for QLD.

Performance

METU vs. QLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily META Bull 2X ETF (METU) and ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, METU achieves a -39.77% return, which is significantly lower than QLD's 18.94% return.

METU

• 1D: 6.66%
• 1M: -11.31%
• 6M: -47.62%
• YTD: -39.77%
• 1Y: -57.12%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -11.55%

QLD

• 1D: 1.20%
• 1M: -7.66%
• 6M: 16.78%
• YTD: 18.94%
• 1Y: 42.18%
• 3Y*: 35.01%
• 5Y*: 17.45%
• 10Y*: 32.56%
• ALL TIME*: 24.68%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
METU Direxion Daily META Bull 2X ETF	$90.59M	$138.47M	$136.75M
QLD ProShares Ultra QQQ	$408.78M	$399.91M	$439.78M

METU vs. QLD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
METU Direxion Daily META Bull 2X ETF	-39.77%	-1.01%	28.79%
QLD ProShares Ultra QQQ	18.94%	30.36%	20.34%

Correlation

The correlation between METU and QLD is 0.52, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.52
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2024	0.59

The correlation between METU and QLD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.

METU vs. QLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	METU	QLD
Communication Services	100.0%	13.1%
Basic Materials	-	1.0%
Consumer Cyclical	-	10.7%
Consumer Defensive	-	6.3%
Energy	-	0.5%
Financial Services	-	0.2%
Healthcare	-	3.6%
Industrials	-	2.7%
Real Estate	-	0.1%
Technology	-	60.9%
Utilities	-	1.1%

Return for Risk

METU vs. QLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

METU

METU Risk / Return Rank: 2
METU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
METU Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
METU Omega Ratio Rank: 3
METU Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
METU Martin Ratio Rank: 0

QLD

QLD Risk / Return Rank: 39
QLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
QLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
QLD Omega Ratio Rank: 38
QLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
QLD Martin Ratio Rank: 41

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

METU vs. QLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily META Bull 2X ETF (METU) and ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	METU	QLD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.78	0.95	-1.73
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.10	1.44	-2.54
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.86	1.18	-0.32
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.94	1.46	-2.40
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.51	4.32	-5.83

METU vs. QLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current METU Sharpe Ratio is -0.78, which is lower than the QLD Sharpe Ratio of 0.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of METU and QLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

METU vs. QLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum METU drawdown since its inception was -63.90%, smaller than the maximum QLD drawdown of -83.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for METU and QLD.

Drawdown Indicators

	METU	QLD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-63.90%	-83.13%	+19.23%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-63.59%	-25.13%	-38.46%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-42.29%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-63.68%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-63.68%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-61.50%	-16.72%	-44.78%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-25.76%	-18.11%	-7.65%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	39.50%	8.47%	+31.03%

Volatility

METU vs. QLD - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily META Bull 2X ETF (METU) has a higher volatility of 31.30% compared to ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) at 13.69%. This indicates that METU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	METU	QLD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	31.30%	13.69%	+17.61%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	61.17%	31.99%	+29.18%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	79.58%	38.62%	+40.96%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	75.03%	45.76%	+29.27%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	75.03%	44.97%	+30.06%

METU vs. QLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

METU has a 1.02% expense ratio, which is higher than QLD's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

METU vs. QLD - Dividend Comparison

METU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.61%, more than QLD's 0.14% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
METU Direxion Daily META Bull 2X ETF	4.61%	3.00%	1.40%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QLD ProShares Ultra QQQ	0.14%	0.17%	0.25%	0.33%	0.31%	0.00%	0.00%	0.13%	0.06%	0.02%	0.21%	0.11%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both METU and QLD in my portfolio?

METU and QLD have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, METU or QLD?

METU has higher volatility (31.30%) compared to QLD (13.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, METU dropped -63.90% vs QLD's -83.13%.

Which ETF is better, METU or QLD?

On 1-year performance, QLD leads with 42.18% vs -57.12% for METU. On fees, QLD is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, QLD has been the lower-risk option at 13.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, METU or QLD?

Over the 1-year period, QLD has performed better with a 42.18% return vs -57.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, METU or QLD?

QLD is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.02% for METU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, METU or QLD?

METU has the higher dividend yield at 4.61%, compared with 0.14% for QLD.

What is the main difference between METU and QLD?

They also come from different issuers: Direxion and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 1.02% for METU and 0.95% for QLD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.95 vs -0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.