METL vs. GLTR

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF (METL) and Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF (GLTR).

METL and GLTR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. METL is an actively managed fund by Sprott. It was launched on Sep 9, 2025. GLTR is a passively managed fund by Aberdeen that tracks the performance of the ETFS Physical Precious Metals Basket Index. It was launched on Oct 22, 2010.

Performance

METL vs. GLTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF (METL) and Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF (GLTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

METL vs. GLTR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
METL Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF	6.41%	27.04%
GLTR Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF	6.38%	34.42%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with METL having a 6.41% return and GLTR slightly lower at 6.38%.

METL

• 1D: 6.47%
• 1M: -16.66%
• YTD: 6.41%
• 6M: 23.35%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GLTR

• 1D: 4.98%
• 1M: -14.74%
• YTD: 6.38%
• 6M: 32.20%
• 1Y: 68.93%
• 3Y*: 33.85%
• 5Y*: 18.37%
• 10Y*: 14.10%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

METL vs. GLTR - Expense Ratio Comparison

METL has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than GLTR's 0.60% expense ratio.

METL

Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF

GLTR

Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF

Return for Risk

METL vs. GLTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLTR

GLTR Risk / Return Rank: 85
GLTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
GLTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
GLTR Omega Ratio Rank: 89
GLTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
GLTR Martin Ratio Rank: 80

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

METL vs. GLTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF (METL) and Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF (GLTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	METL	GLTR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.87	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.80	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.70	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.62	0.34	+1.28

Correlation

The correlation between METL and GLTR is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

METL vs. GLTR - Dividend Comparison

METL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%, while GLTR has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025
METL Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF	0.93%	0.99%
GLTR Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

METL vs. GLTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum METL drawdown since its inception was -27.39%, smaller than the maximum GLTR drawdown of -55.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for METL and GLTR.

Drawdown Indicators

	METL	GLTR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.39%	-55.70%	+28.31%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-29.70%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-29.70%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-29.70%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-19.32%	-23.32%	+4.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.76%	-28.89%	+22.13%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	8.54%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	METL	GLTR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	13.48%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	35.75%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	44.92%	37.11%	+7.81%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	44.92%	23.16%	+21.76%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	44.92%	20.28%	+24.64%