METL vs. GLTR

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

METL (Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF) and GLTR (abrdn Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - METL is a Natural Resources fund actively managed by Sprott, while GLTR is a Precious Metals fund tracking the ETFS Physical Precious Metals Basket Index. METL is actively managed, while GLTR is passively managed. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. METL charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for GLTR.

Performance

METL vs. GLTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF (METL) and abrdn Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF (GLTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, METL achieves a 5.42% return, which is significantly higher than GLTR's -9.21% return.

METL

• 1D: -4.31%
• 1M: -5.33%
• YTD: 5.42%
• 6M: 3.02%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GLTR

• 1D: -3.07%
• 1M: -12.32%
• YTD: -9.21%
• 6M: -12.60%
• 1Y: 33.31%
• 3Y*: 29.08%
• 5Y*: 14.31%
• 10Y*: 11.27%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

METL vs. GLTR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
METL Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF	5.42%	28.19%
GLTR abrdn Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF	-9.21%	35.17%

Correlation

The correlation between METL and GLTR is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2025	0.75

Return for Risk

METL vs. GLTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

METL

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

GLTR

GLTR Risk / Return Rank: 24
GLTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
GLTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
GLTR Omega Ratio Rank: 29
GLTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
GLTR Martin Ratio Rank: 20

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

METL vs. GLTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF (METL) and abrdn Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF (GLTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	METL	GLTR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	0.86	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	1.22	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.19	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	0.97	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	2.27	—

Drawdowns

METL vs. GLTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum METL drawdown since its inception was -27.39%, smaller than the maximum GLTR drawdown of -55.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for METL and GLTR.

Drawdown Indicators

	METL	GLTR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.39%	-55.70%	+28.31%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-34.55%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-34.55%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-34.55%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-34.55%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-20.07%	-34.55%	+14.48%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.64%	-28.83%	+20.19%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	14.68%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	METL	GLTR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	10.06%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	36.51%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	45.01%	38.78%	+6.23%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	45.01%	23.90%	+21.11%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	45.01%	20.68%	+24.33%

METL vs. GLTR - Expense Ratio Comparison

METL has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than GLTR's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

METL vs. GLTR - Dividend Comparison

METL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.94%, while GLTR has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
GLTR abrdn Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF	0.00%	0.00%
METL Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF	0.94%	0.99%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both METL and GLTR in my portfolio?

METL and GLTR have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, METL or GLTR?

On fees, GLTR is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, METL or GLTR?

GLTR is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for METL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, METL or GLTR?

METL has the higher dividend yield at 0.94%, compared with 0.00% for GLTR.

What is the main difference between METL and GLTR?

METL is categorized as Natural Resources, while GLTR is Precious Metals. They also come from different issuers: Sprott and abrdn. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for METL and 0.60% for GLTR.