METL vs. GBUG

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

METL (Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF) and GBUG (Sprott Active Gold & Silver Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - METL is a Natural Resources fund actively managed by Sprott, while GBUG is a Gold fund actively managed by Sprott. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.89% expense ratio.

Performance

METL vs. GBUG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF (METL) and Sprott Active Gold & Silver Miners ETF (GBUG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, METL achieves a 2.07% return, which is significantly higher than GBUG's -11.69% return.

METL

• 1D: 0.60%
• 1M: -11.44%
• YTD: 2.07%
• 6M: 0.66%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GBUG

• 1D: 2.23%
• 1M: -13.12%
• YTD: -11.69%
• 6M: -14.96%
• 1Y: 55.70%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

METL vs. GBUG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
METL Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF	2.07%	28.19%
GBUG Sprott Active Gold & Silver Miners ETF	-11.69%	35.81%

Correlation

The correlation between METL and GBUG is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2025	0.85

Return for Risk

METL vs. GBUG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

METL

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

GBUG

GBUG Risk / Return Rank: 32
GBUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
GBUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
GBUG Omega Ratio Rank: 35
GBUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
GBUG Martin Ratio Rank: 30

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

METL vs. GBUG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF (METL) and Sprott Active Gold & Silver Miners ETF (GBUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	METL	GBUG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.11	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	1.55	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.21	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	1.52	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	3.89	—

Drawdowns

METL vs. GBUG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum METL drawdown since its inception was -27.39%, smaller than the maximum GBUG drawdown of -36.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for METL and GBUG.

Drawdown Indicators

	METL	GBUG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.39%	-36.90%	+9.51%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-36.90%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-22.61%	-33.68%	+11.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.78%	-8.62%	-0.16%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	14.37%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	METL	GBUG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	19.23%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	42.45%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	45.00%	50.44%	-5.44%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	45.00%	48.64%	-3.64%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	45.00%	48.64%	-3.64%

METL vs. GBUG - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both METL and GBUG have an expense ratio of 0.89%.

Dividends

METL vs. GBUG - Dividend Comparison

METL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.97%, less than GBUG's 1.76% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
GBUG Sprott Active Gold & Silver Miners ETF	1.76%	1.56%
METL Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF	0.97%	0.99%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both METL and GBUG in my portfolio?

METL and GBUG have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, METL or GBUG?

Both ETFs have the same 0.89% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, METL or GBUG?

METL and GBUG have the same expense ratio: 0.89% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, METL or GBUG?

GBUG has the higher dividend yield at 1.76%, compared with 0.97% for METL.

What is the main difference between METL and GBUG?

METL is categorized as Natural Resources, while GBUG is Gold.