METL vs. COPX
METL (Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF) and COPX (Global X Copper Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - METL is a Commodity Producers Equities fund actively managed by Sprott, while COPX is a Materials fund tracking the Solactive Global Copper Miners Total Return Index. METL is actively managed, while COPX is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. METL charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for COPX.
Performance
METL vs. COPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, METL achieves a 18.34% return, which is significantly lower than COPX's 25.71% return.
METL
- 1D
- -3.81%
- 1M
- 5.71%
- YTD
- 18.34%
- 6M
- 25.03%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
COPX
- 1D
- -3.64%
- 1M
- 17.74%
- YTD
- 25.71%
- 6M
- 36.90%
- 1Y
- 120.82%
- 3Y*
- 37.36%
- 5Y*
- 19.87%
- 10Y*
- 21.95%
METL vs. COPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
METL Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF | 18.34% | 27.04% |
COPX Global X Copper Miners ETF | 25.71% | 41.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between METL and COPX is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2025 | 0.83 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
METL vs. COPX — Risk / Return Rank
METL
COPX
METL vs. COPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF (METL) and Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| METL | COPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.93 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.55 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.62 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.72 | 0.19 | +1.53 |
Drawdowns
METL vs. COPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum METL drawdown since its inception was -27.39%, smaller than the maximum COPX drawdown of -83.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for METL and COPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| METL | COPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.39% | -83.16% | +55.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -27.82% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -39.72% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -42.12% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -65.41% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.27% | -5.69% | -4.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.11% | -39.30% | +31.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 8.66% | — |
Volatility
METL vs. COPX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| METL | COPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 15.38% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 35.68% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.94% | 41.41% | +2.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.94% | 36.51% | +7.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 43.94% | 35.55% | +8.39% |
METL vs. COPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
METL has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than COPX's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
METL vs. COPX - Dividend Comparison
METL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.84%, less than COPX's 2.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COPX Global X Copper Miners ETF | 2.13% | 2.68% | 1.80% | 2.39% | 3.14% | 1.48% | 1.30% | 1.37% | 2.59% | 1.57% | 0.60% | 1.20% |
METL Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF | 0.84% | 0.99% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
METL and COPX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, COPX is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
COPX is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for METL.
COPX has the higher dividend yield at 2.13%, compared with 0.84% for METL.
METL is categorized as Commodity Producers Equities, while COPX is Materials. They also come from different issuers: Sprott and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for METL and 0.65% for COPX.
Find the right allocation for METL and COPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer