META vs. ATMP
META (Meta Platforms, Inc.) is a stock, while ATMP (Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN) is MLPs fund tracking the CIBC Atlas Select MLP VWAP. Over the past 10 years, META returned 17.39%/yr vs 5.20%/yr for ATMP. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
META vs. ATMP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, META achieves a -14.03% return, which is significantly lower than ATMP's 20.60% return. Over the past 10 years, META has outperformed ATMP with an annualized return of 17.39%, while ATMP has yielded a comparatively lower 5.20% annualized return.
META
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- -8.32%
- YTD
- -14.03%
- 6M
- -11.84%
- 1Y
- -16.71%
- 3Y*
- 28.18%
- 5Y*
- 11.52%
- 10Y*
- 17.39%
ATMP
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- -3.30%
- YTD
- 20.60%
- 6M
- 20.43%
- 1Y
- 18.09%
- 3Y*
- 21.55%
- 5Y*
- 15.05%
- 10Y*
- 5.20%
META vs. ATMP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
META Meta Platforms, Inc. | -14.03% | 13.09% | 66.05% | 194.13% | -64.22% | 23.13% | 33.09% | 56.57% | -25.71% | 53.38% |
ATMP Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN | 20.60% | 1.73% | 31.66% | 14.51% | 20.71% | 33.06% | -34.39% | 0.39% | -14.55% | -11.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between META and ATMP is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 2013 | 0.20 |
The correlation between META and ATMP shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (1 year) to 0.22 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
META vs. ATMP — Risk / Return Rank
META
ATMP
META vs. ATMP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) and Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN (ATMP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| META | ATMP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.81 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | 1.23 | -0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.54 | 2.53 | -3.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.12 | 5.89 | -7.01 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
META vs. ATMP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum META drawdown since its inception was -76.74%, smaller than the maximum ATMP drawdown of -80.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for META and ATMP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| META | ATMP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.74% | -80.86% | +4.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.30% | -7.30% | -26.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.15% | -16.48% | -17.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -76.74% | -22.98% | -53.76% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -76.74% | -75.66% | -1.08% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -28.06% | -5.61% | -22.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.83% | -31.08% | +15.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.06% | 3.13% | +12.93% |
Volatility
META vs. ATMP - Volatility Comparison
Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) has a higher volatility of 10.17% compared to Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN (ATMP) at 5.64%. This indicates that META's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ATMP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| META | ATMP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.17% | 5.64% | +4.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.91% | 10.99% | +15.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.52% | 14.18% | +21.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.04% | 22.25% | +21.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 38.67% | 27.67% | +11.00% |
Dividends
META vs. ATMP - Dividend Comparison
META's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%, while ATMP has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
ATMP Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
META Meta Platforms, Inc. | 0.37% | 0.32% | 0.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
META and ATMP have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
META has higher volatility (10.17%) compared to ATMP (5.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, META dropped -76.74% vs ATMP's -80.86%.
ATMP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.30 vs -0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for META and ATMP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer