META vs. AAPL

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) and Apple Inc (AAPL).

Performance

META vs. AAPL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) and Apple Inc (AAPL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

META vs. AAPL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
META Meta Platforms, Inc.	-13.25%	13.09%	66.05%	194.13%	-64.22%	23.13%	33.09%	56.57%	-25.71%	53.38%
AAPL Apple Inc	-6.56%	9.05%	30.71%	49.01%	-26.40%	34.65%	82.31%	88.96%	-5.39%	48.46%

Fundamentals

Market Cap META : $1.47T AAPL : $3.76T
EPS META : $23.51 AAPL : $7.89
PE Ratio META : 24.34 AAPL : 32.15
PEG Ratio META : 1.00 AAPL : 4.23
PS Ratio META : 7.32 AAPL : 8.69
PB Ratio META : 6.78 AAPL : 42.62
Total Revenue (TTM) META : $200.97B AAPL : $435.62B
Gross Profit (TTM) META : $164.79B AAPL : $206.16B
EBITDA (TTM) META : $104.55B AAPL : $150.07B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, META achieves a -13.25% return, which is significantly lower than AAPL's -6.56% return. Over the past 10 years, META has underperformed AAPL with an annualized return of 17.39%, while AAPL has yielded a comparatively higher 26.13% annualized return.

META

• 1D: 6.67%
• 1M: -11.66%
• YTD: -13.25%
• 6M: -21.96%
• 1Y: -0.42%
• 3Y*: 39.60%
• 5Y*: 14.06%
• 10Y*: 17.39%

AAPL

• 1D: 2.90%
• 1M: -3.93%
• YTD: -6.56%
• 6M: -0.14%
• 1Y: 14.75%
• 3Y*: 16.01%
• 5Y*: 16.20%
• 10Y*: 26.13%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

META vs. AAPL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

META

META Risk / Return Rank: 40
META Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
META Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
META Omega Ratio Rank: 37
META Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
META Martin Ratio Rank: 41

AAPL

AAPL Risk / Return Rank: 59
AAPL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
AAPL Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
AAPL Omega Ratio Rank: 56
AAPL Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
AAPL Martin Ratio Rank: 63

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

META vs. AAPL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) and Apple Inc (AAPL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	META	AAPL	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.01	0.47	-0.48
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.29	0.92	-0.63
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.04	1.13	-0.09
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.01	0.74	-0.75
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.04	2.30	-2.34
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

META vs. AAPL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current META Sharpe Ratio is -0.01, which is lower than the AAPL Sharpe Ratio of 0.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of META and AAPL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	META	AAPL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.01	0.47	-0.48
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.32	0.59	-0.27
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.45	0.91	-0.45
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.55	0.43	+0.11

Correlation

The correlation between META and AAPL is 0.44, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

META vs. AAPL - Dividend Comparison

META's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%, less than AAPL's 0.41% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
META Meta Platforms, Inc.	0.37%	0.32%	0.34%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
AAPL Apple Inc	0.41%	0.38%	0.40%	0.49%	0.70%	0.49%	0.61%	1.04%	1.79%	1.45%	1.93%	1.93%

Drawdowns

META vs. AAPL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum META drawdown since its inception was -76.74%, smaller than the maximum AAPL drawdown of -81.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for META and AAPL.

Drawdown Indicators

	META	AAPL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-76.74%	-81.80%	+5.06%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-33.30%	-22.99%	-10.31%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-76.74%	-33.36%	-43.38%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-76.74%	-38.52%	-38.22%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-27.41%	-11.24%	-16.17%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.19%	-29.71%	+14.52%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	13.13%	7.38%	+5.75%

Volatility

META vs. AAPL - Volatility Comparison

Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) has a higher volatility of 13.64% compared to Apple Inc (AAPL) at 5.58%. This indicates that META's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AAPL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	META	AAPL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.64%	5.58%	+8.06%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	26.73%	15.09%	+11.64%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	39.91%	31.66%	+8.25%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	43.77%	27.46%	+16.31%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	38.46%	28.94%	+9.52%

Financials

META vs. AAPL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Meta Platforms, Inc. and Apple Inc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

META - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Meta Platforms, Inc. reported a gross profit of 48.99B and revenue of 59.89B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 81.8%.

AAPL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Apple Inc reported a gross profit of 69.23B and revenue of 143.76B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 48.2%.

META - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Meta Platforms, Inc. reported an operating income of 24.75B and revenue of 59.89B, resulting in an operating margin of 41.3%.

AAPL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Apple Inc reported an operating income of 50.85B and revenue of 143.76B, resulting in an operating margin of 35.4%.

META - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Meta Platforms, Inc. reported a net income of 22.77B and revenue of 59.89B, resulting in a net margin of 38.0%.

AAPL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Apple Inc reported a net income of 42.10B and revenue of 143.76B, resulting in a net margin of 29.3%.