PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MET vs. VOD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MET vs. VOD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MetLife, Inc. (MET) and Vodafone Group Plc (VOD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MET achieves a 14.21% return, which is significantly lower than VOD's 19.76% return. Over the past 10 years, MET has outperformed VOD with an annualized return of 14.00%, while VOD has yielded a comparatively lower -0.06% annualized return.


MET

1D
1.44%
1M
13.78%
YTD
14.21%
6M
9.74%
1Y
15.84%
3Y*
20.82%
5Y*
10.04%
10Y*
14.00%

VOD

1D
1.77%
1M
2.00%
YTD
19.76%
6M
25.65%
1Y
61.62%
3Y*
27.46%
5Y*
4.14%
10Y*
-0.06%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MET vs. VOD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MET
MetLife, Inc.
14.21%-0.80%27.68%-5.49%19.23%37.43%-3.42%28.84%-15.77%21.67%
VOD
Vodafone Group Plc
19.76%63.00%5.68%-4.59%-27.22%-3.57%-9.63%5.64%-34.92%38.22%

Correlation

The correlation between MET and VOD is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2000

0.37

The correlation between MET and VOD shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (3 years) to 0.37 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

MET:

$7.21

VOD:

-€1.92

PS Ratio

MET:

0.58

VOD:

0.41

Total Revenue (TTM)

MET:

$76.95B

VOD:

€78.20B

Gross Profit (TTM)

MET:

$14.75B

VOD:

€25.34B

EBITDA (TTM)

MET:

$4.11B

VOD:

€25.58B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MET vs. VOD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MET
MET Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
MET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MET Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
MET Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
MET Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
MET Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

VOD
VOD Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
VOD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOD Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
VOD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOD Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MET vs. VOD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MetLife, Inc. (MET) and Vodafone Group Plc (VOD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


METVODDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.86

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.43

-0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.91

6.16

-5.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.48

14.54

-12.07

MET vs. VOD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MET Sharpe Ratio is 0.69, which is lower than the VOD Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MET and VOD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MET vs. VOD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MET drawdown since its inception was -82.37%, roughly equal to the maximum VOD drawdown of -79.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MET and VOD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


METVODDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.37%

-79.32%

-3.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.46%

-10.05%

-7.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.97%

-20.03%

-1.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.09%

-49.24%

+14.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-55.16%

-62.36%

+7.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-16.19%

+16.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.62%

-32.70%

+15.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.42%

4.25%

+2.17%

Volatility

MET vs. VOD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MetLife, Inc. (MET) is 6.17%, while Vodafone Group Plc (VOD) has a volatility of 7.37%. This indicates that MET experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VOD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


METVODDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.17%

7.37%

-1.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.44%

19.67%

-2.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.16%

25.97%

-2.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.72%

27.00%

-1.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.70%

27.85%

+2.85%

Dividends

MET vs. VOD - Dividend Comparison

MET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.58%, less than VOD's 3.43% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MET
MetLife, Inc.
2.58%2.85%2.63%3.12%2.74%3.04%3.88%3.41%4.04%14.52%2.92%3.06%
VOD
Vodafone Group Plc
3.43%3.86%8.58%11.15%9.27%7.04%6.11%4.92%8.99%5.33%12.26%6.77%

Financials

MET vs. VOD - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between MetLife, Inc. and Vodafone Group Plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


14.00B16.00B18.00B20.00B22.00B24.00B20222023202420252026
19.07B
21.14B
(MET) Total Revenue
(VOD) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. MET values in USD, VOD values in EUR

MET vs. VOD - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between MetLife, Inc. and Vodafone Group Plc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%202220232024202520260
30.5%
Portfolio components
MET - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MetLife, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 19.07B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

VOD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vodafone Group Plc reported a gross profit of 6.44B and revenue of 21.14B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 30.5%.

MET - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MetLife, Inc. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 19.07B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

VOD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vodafone Group Plc reported an operating income of 1.13B and revenue of 21.14B, resulting in an operating margin of 5.3%.

MET - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MetLife, Inc. reported a net income of 1.19B and revenue of 19.07B, resulting in a net margin of 6.2%.

VOD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vodafone Group Plc reported a net income of -1.24B and revenue of 21.14B, resulting in a net margin of -5.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


MET and VOD have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VOD has higher volatility (7.37%) compared to MET (6.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MET dropped -82.37% vs VOD's -79.32%.

VOD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MET and VOD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer