MET vs. T
MET (MetLife, Inc.) and T (AT&T Inc.) are both stocks. MET operates in Insurance - Life (Financial Services), while T operates in Telecom Services (Communication Services). Over the past 10 years, MET returned 13.20%/yr vs 2.86%/yr for T. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MET vs. T - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MET achieves a 8.48% return, which is significantly higher than T's -7.40% return. Over the past 10 years, MET has outperformed T with an annualized return of 13.20%, while T has yielded a comparatively lower 2.86% annualized return.
MET
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- 8.90%
- YTD
- 8.48%
- 6M
- 9.68%
- 1Y
- 8.74%
- 3Y*
- 19.71%
- 5Y*
- 8.72%
- 10Y*
- 13.20%
T
- 1D
- -1.10%
- 1M
- -10.57%
- YTD
- -7.40%
- 6M
- -7.40%
- 1Y
- -16.38%
- 3Y*
- 18.39%
- 5Y*
- 6.60%
- 10Y*
- 2.86%
MET vs. T - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MET MetLife, Inc. | 8.48% | -0.80% | 27.68% | -5.49% | 19.23% | 37.43% | -3.42% | 28.84% | -15.77% | 21.67% |
T AT&T Inc. | -7.40% | 13.97% | 44.08% | -2.74% | 5.76% | -8.09% | -21.37% | 45.55% | -22.25% | -4.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between MET and T is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 6, 2000 | 0.38 |
Over the past year, the correlation between MET and T has dropped to 0.10 - well below their long-term average of 0.38, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
MET:
$7.21
T:
$3.04
MET:
11.71
T:
7.39
MET:
0.39
T:
0.31
MET:
0.55
T:
1.29
MET:
$76.95B
T:
$125.65B
MET:
$14.75B
T:
$105.41B
MET:
$4.11B
T:
$54.70B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MET vs. T — Risk / Return Rank
MET
T
MET vs. T - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MetLife, Inc. (MET) and AT&T Inc. (T). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MET | T | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.64 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 0.89 | +0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.50 | -0.75 | +1.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.36 | -1.59 | +2.95 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MET | T | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 | -0.75 | +1.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 | 0.28 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 | 0.12 | +0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.26 | 0.38 | -0.11 |
Drawdowns
MET vs. T - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MET drawdown since its inception was -82.37%, which is greater than T's maximum drawdown of -64.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MET and T.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MET | T | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.37% | -64.15% | -18.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.46% | -21.87% | +4.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.97% | -21.87% | -0.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.09% | -32.01% | -3.08% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -55.16% | -42.35% | -12.81% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.15% | -21.87% | +21.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.63% | -15.72% | -1.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.42% | 10.34% | -3.92% |
Volatility
MET vs. T - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for MetLife, Inc. (MET) is 6.33%, while AT&T Inc. (T) has a volatility of 7.50%. This indicates that MET experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than T based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MET | T | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.33% | 7.50% | -1.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.47% | 17.57% | -0.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.08% | 21.98% | +1.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.73% | 23.97% | +1.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.71% | 23.71% | +7.00% |
Dividends
MET vs. T - Dividend Comparison
MET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.72%, less than T's 4.93% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MET MetLife, Inc. | 2.72% | 2.85% | 2.63% | 3.12% | 2.74% | 3.04% | 3.88% | 3.41% | 4.04% | 14.52% | 2.92% | 3.06% |
T AT&T Inc. | 4.93% | 4.47% | 4.87% | 6.62% | 6.66% | 8.46% | 7.23% | 5.22% | 7.01% | 5.04% | 4.51% | 5.46% |
Financials
MET vs. T - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between MetLife, Inc. and AT&T Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
MET and T have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
T has higher volatility (7.50%) compared to MET (6.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MET dropped -82.37% vs T's -64.15%.
MET currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.38 vs -0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MET and T
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer