MET vs. T
MET (MetLife, Inc.) and T (AT&T Inc.) are both stocks. MET operates in Insurance - Life (Financial Services), while T operates in Telecom Services (Communication Services). Over the past 10 years, MET returned 14.26%/yr vs 2.10%/yr for T. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MET vs. T - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MET achieves a 19.55% return, which is significantly higher than T's -7.04% return. Over the past 10 years, MET has outperformed T with an annualized return of 14.26%, while T has yielded a comparatively lower 2.10% annualized return.
MET
- 1D
- -1.07%
- 1M
- 8.66%
- 6M
- 22.93%
- YTD
- 19.55%
- 1Y
- 24.15%
- 3Y*
- 18.50%
- 5Y*
- 12.92%
- 10Y*
- 14.26%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.81%
T
- 1D
- 0.64%
- 1M
- 2.62%
- 6M
- -2.84%
- YTD
- -7.04%
- 1Y
- -13.37%
- 3Y*
- 20.93%
- 5Y*
- 7.13%
- 10Y*
- 2.10%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.35%
MET vs. T - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MET MetLife, Inc. | 19.55% | -0.80% | 27.68% | -5.49% | 19.23% | 37.43% | -3.42% | 28.84% | -15.77% | 21.67% |
T AT&T Inc. | -7.04% | 13.97% | 44.08% | -2.74% | 5.76% | -8.09% | -21.37% | 45.55% | -22.25% | -4.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between MET and T is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2000 | 0.38 |
Over the past year, the correlation between MET and T has dropped to 0.14 - well below their long-term average of 0.38, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
MET:
$59.83B
T:
$152.52B
MET:
$8.14
T:
$3.05
MET:
11.43
T:
7.19
MET:
0.38
T:
0.30
MET:
0.54
T:
1.25
MET:
$76.95B
T:
$125.65B
MET:
$14.75B
T:
$105.41B
MET:
$4.11B
T:
$54.70B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MET vs. T — Risk / Return Rank
MET
T
MET vs. T - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MetLife, Inc. (MET) and AT&T Inc. (T). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MET | T | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.58 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 0.92 | +0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.39 | -0.46 | +1.85 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.88 | -1.03 | +4.91 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MET vs. T - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MET drawdown since its inception was -82.37%, which is greater than T's maximum drawdown of -64.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MET and T.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MET | T | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.37% | -64.15% | -18.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.46% | -28.89% | +11.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.97% | -28.89% | +6.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.09% | -32.01% | -3.08% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -55.16% | -42.35% | -12.81% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.07% | -21.57% | +20.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.56% | -15.74% | -1.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.24% | 12.94% | -6.70% |
Volatility
MET vs. T - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for MetLife, Inc. (MET) is 7.67%, while AT&T Inc. (T) has a volatility of 9.59%. This indicates that MET experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than T based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MET | T | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.67% | 9.59% | -1.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.90% | 19.91% | -2.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.99% | 23.72% | +0.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.52% | 24.38% | +1.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.37% | 23.92% | +6.45% |
Dividends
MET vs. T - Dividend Comparison
MET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.47%, less than T's 6.58% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MET MetLife, Inc. | 2.47% | 2.85% | 2.63% | 3.12% | 2.74% | 3.04% | 3.88% | 3.41% | 4.04% | 14.52% | 2.92% | 3.06% |
T AT&T Inc. | 6.58% | 4.47% | 4.87% | 6.62% | 6.66% | 8.46% | 7.23% | 5.22% | 7.01% | 5.04% | 4.51% | 5.46% |
Financials
MET vs. T - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between MetLife, Inc. and AT&T Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
MET and T have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
T has higher volatility (9.59%) compared to MET (7.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MET dropped -82.37% vs T's -64.15%.
MET currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.01 vs -0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MET and T
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer