PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MET vs. SPY
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

MET vs. SPY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MetLife, Inc. (MET) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

MET vs. SPY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MET
MetLife, Inc.
-9.77%-0.80%27.68%-5.49%19.23%37.43%-3.42%28.84%-15.77%21.67%
SPY
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF
-4.37%17.72%24.89%26.18%-18.18%28.73%18.33%31.22%-4.57%21.71%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MET achieves a -9.77% return, which is significantly lower than SPY's -4.37% return. Over the past 10 years, MET has underperformed SPY with an annualized return of 10.86%, while SPY has yielded a comparatively higher 13.98% annualized return.


MET

1D
3.59%
1M
-1.87%
YTD
-9.77%
6M
-12.90%
1Y
-9.30%
3Y*
10.23%
5Y*
5.97%
10Y*
10.86%

SPY

1D
2.91%
1M
-4.94%
YTD
-4.37%
6M
-1.82%
1Y
17.59%
3Y*
18.19%
5Y*
11.69%
10Y*
13.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MET vs. SPY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MET
MET Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
MET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MET Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
MET Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
MET Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
MET Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

SPY
SPY Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
SPY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPY Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
SPY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPY Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MET vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MetLife, Inc. (MET) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


METSPYDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.33

0.93

-1.26

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.26

1.45

-1.72

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.96

1.22

-0.26

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.46

1.53

-1.99

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.15

7.30

-8.45

MET vs. SPY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MET Sharpe Ratio is -0.33, which is lower than the SPY Sharpe Ratio of 0.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MET and SPY, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


METSPYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.33

0.93

-1.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

0.69

-0.46

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

0.78

-0.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.24

0.56

-0.32

Correlation

The correlation between MET and SPY is 0.63, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

MET vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison

MET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.21%, more than SPY's 1.14% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MET
MetLife, Inc.
3.21%2.85%2.63%3.12%2.74%3.04%3.88%3.41%4.04%14.52%2.92%3.06%
SPY
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF
1.14%1.07%1.21%1.40%1.65%1.20%1.52%1.75%2.04%1.80%2.03%2.06%

Drawdowns

MET vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MET drawdown since its inception was -82.37%, which is greater than SPY's maximum drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MET and SPY.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


METSPYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.37%

-55.19%

-27.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.46%

-12.05%

-5.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.09%

-24.50%

-10.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-55.16%

-33.72%

-21.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.95%

-6.24%

-10.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.71%

-9.09%

-8.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.03%

2.52%

+4.51%

Volatility

MET vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison

MetLife, Inc. (MET) has a higher volatility of 6.49% compared to State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) at 5.31%. This indicates that MET's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


METSPYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.49%

5.31%

+1.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.81%

9.47%

+8.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.54%

19.05%

+9.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.68%

17.06%

+8.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.74%

17.92%

+12.82%