MET vs. SHEL
MET (MetLife, Inc.) and SHEL (Shell plc) are both stocks. MET operates in Insurance - Life (Financial Services), while SHEL operates in Oil & Gas Integrated (Energy). Over the past 10 years, MET returned 14.00%/yr vs 10.35%/yr for SHEL. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MET vs. SHEL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MET achieves a 14.21% return, which is significantly lower than SHEL's 18.73% return. Over the past 10 years, MET has outperformed SHEL with an annualized return of 14.00%, while SHEL has yielded a comparatively lower 10.35% annualized return.
MET
- 1D
- 1.44%
- 1M
- 13.78%
- YTD
- 14.21%
- 6M
- 9.74%
- 1Y
- 15.84%
- 3Y*
- 20.82%
- 5Y*
- 10.04%
- 10Y*
- 14.00%
SHEL
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- 1.77%
- YTD
- 18.73%
- 6M
- 20.62%
- 1Y
- 24.51%
- 3Y*
- 18.27%
- 5Y*
- 22.23%
- 10Y*
- 10.35%
MET vs. SHEL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MET MetLife, Inc. | 14.21% | -0.80% | 27.68% | -5.49% | 19.23% | 37.43% | -3.42% | 28.84% | -15.77% | 21.67% |
SHEL Shell plc | 18.73% | 22.16% | -0.87% | 20.19% | 36.18% | 34.27% | -41.08% | 6.38% | -7.23% | 21.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between MET and SHEL is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 21, 2005 | 0.42 |
Over the past year, the correlation between MET and SHEL has dropped to 0.04 - well below their long-term average of 0.42, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
MET:
$7.21
SHEL:
$6.39
MET:
12.33
SHEL:
13.40
MET:
0.41
SHEL:
0.67
MET:
0.58
SHEL:
0.94
MET:
$76.95B
SHEL:
$266.82B
MET:
$14.75B
SHEL:
$41.65B
MET:
$4.11B
SHEL:
$57.44B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MET vs. SHEL — Risk / Return Rank
MET
SHEL
MET vs. SHEL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MetLife, Inc. (MET) and Shell plc (SHEL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MET | SHEL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.61 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.21 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.91 | 2.28 | -1.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.48 | 6.17 | -3.69 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MET vs. SHEL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MET drawdown since its inception was -82.37%, which is greater than SHEL's maximum drawdown of -71.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MET and SHEL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MET | SHEL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.37% | -71.57% | -10.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.46% | -10.81% | -6.65% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.97% | -18.47% | -3.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.09% | -25.04% | -10.05% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -55.16% | -71.57% | +16.41% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -8.19% | +8.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.62% | -16.73% | -0.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.42% | 3.99% | +2.43% |
Volatility
MET vs. SHEL - Volatility Comparison
MetLife, Inc. (MET) and Shell plc (SHEL) have volatilities of 6.17% and 5.99%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MET | SHEL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.17% | 5.99% | +0.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.44% | 17.43% | +0.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.16% | 20.98% | +2.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.72% | 25.21% | +0.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.70% | 30.83% | -0.13% |
Dividends
MET vs. SHEL - Dividend Comparison
MET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.58%, less than SHEL's 3.45% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MET MetLife, Inc. | 2.58% | 2.85% | 2.63% | 3.12% | 2.74% | 3.04% | 3.88% | 3.41% | 4.04% | 14.52% | 2.92% | 3.06% |
SHEL Shell plc | 3.45% | 3.90% | 4.39% | 3.76% | 3.48% | 3.78% | 5.69% | 6.27% | 6.27% | 2.75% | 6.49% | 8.17% |
Financials
MET vs. SHEL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between MetLife, Inc. and Shell plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
MET vs. SHEL - Profitability Comparison
MET - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MetLife, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 19.07B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
SHEL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Shell plc reported a gross profit of 13.31B and revenue of 69.57B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 19.1%.
MET - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MetLife, Inc. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 19.07B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
SHEL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Shell plc reported an operating income of 10.35B and revenue of 69.57B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.9%.
MET - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MetLife, Inc. reported a net income of 1.19B and revenue of 19.07B, resulting in a net margin of 6.2%.
SHEL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Shell plc reported a net income of 5.68B and revenue of 69.57B, resulting in a net margin of 8.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
MET and SHEL have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MET has higher volatility (6.17%) compared to SHEL (5.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MET dropped -82.37% vs SHEL's -71.57%.
SHEL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.17 vs 0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MET and SHEL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer