MEME vs. QUS
MEME (Roundhill Meme Stock ETF) and QUS (SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. MEME is actively managed, while QUS is passively managed. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MEME charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for QUS.
Performance
MEME vs. QUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MEME achieves a 79.03% return, which is significantly higher than QUS's 6.67% return.
MEME
- 1D
- -5.29%
- 1M
- 25.28%
- YTD
- 79.03%
- 6M
- 68.18%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QUS
- 1D
- -0.43%
- 1M
- 2.68%
- YTD
- 6.67%
- 6M
- 6.93%
- 1Y
- 17.65%
- 3Y*
- 17.53%
- 5Y*
- 11.08%
- 10Y*
- 13.67%
MEME vs. QUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MEME Roundhill Meme Stock ETF | 79.03% | -36.83% |
QUS SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF | 6.67% | 1.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between MEME and QUS is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2025 | 0.43 |
MEME vs. QUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MEME
QUS
Technology
Industrials
Utilities
Financial Services
Communication Services
Healthcare
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
MEME
QUS
Industrials
MEME
QUS
Utilities
MEME
QUS
Financial Services
MEME
QUS
Communication Services
MEME
QUS
Healthcare
MEME
QUS
Energy
MEME
QUS
Basic Materials
MEME
QUS
Consumer Cyclical
MEME
-
QUS
Consumer Defensive
MEME
-
QUS
Real Estate
MEME
-
QUS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MEME vs. QUS — Risk / Return Rank
MEME
QUS
MEME vs. QUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Meme Stock ETF (MEME) and SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF (QUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MEME | QUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.95 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.78 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.83 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.28 | 0.77 | -0.49 |
Drawdowns
MEME vs. QUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MEME drawdown since its inception was -48.78%, which is greater than QUS's maximum drawdown of -33.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MEME and QUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MEME | QUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.78% | -33.78% | -15.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.85% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -13.94% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.30% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.78% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.93% | -0.50% | -5.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.90% | -3.70% | -26.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.53% | — |
Volatility
MEME vs. QUS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MEME | QUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.78% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 6.66% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 74.19% | 9.09% | +65.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 74.19% | 14.33% | +59.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 74.19% | 16.42% | +57.77% |
MEME vs. QUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
MEME has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than QUS's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
MEME vs. QUS - Dividend Comparison
MEME has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.31%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MEME Roundhill Meme Stock ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QUS SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF | 1.31% | 1.38% | 1.49% | 1.57% | 1.68% | 1.27% | 1.73% | 1.81% | 2.12% | 1.86% | 2.07% | 1.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MEME and QUS have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QUS is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QUS is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for MEME.
QUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.31%, compared with 0.00% for MEME.
They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for MEME and 0.15% for QUS.
Find the right allocation for MEME and QUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer