MEME vs. FITZ
MEME (Roundhill Meme Stock ETF) and FITZ (Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MEME charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for FITZ.
Performance
MEME vs. FITZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
MEME
- 1D
- 1.71%
- 1M
- 21.14%
- YTD
- 82.10%
- 6M
- 57.24%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FITZ
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MEME vs. FITZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
MEME Roundhill Meme Stock ETF | -4.32% |
FITZ Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF | -1.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between MEME and FITZ is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026 | 0.40 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MEME vs. FITZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Meme Stock ETF (MEME) and Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF (FITZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MEME | FITZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.33 | -7.29 | +7.62 |
Drawdowns
MEME vs. FITZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MEME drawdown since its inception was -48.78%, which is greater than FITZ's maximum drawdown of -1.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MEME and FITZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MEME | FITZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.78% | -1.97% | -46.81% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.32% | -1.97% | -2.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.74% | -1.08% | -28.66% |
Volatility
MEME vs. FITZ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MEME | FITZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 73.99% | 8.74% | +65.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 73.99% | 8.74% | +65.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 73.99% | 8.74% | +65.25% |
MEME vs. FITZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
MEME has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than FITZ's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
MEME vs. FITZ - Dividend Comparison
Neither MEME nor FITZ has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
MEME and FITZ have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MEME is cheaper at 0.69% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MEME is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for FITZ.
MEME and FITZ have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Nicholas. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for MEME and 0.75% for FITZ.
Find the right allocation for MEME and FITZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer