PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MEME vs. FITZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MEME vs. FITZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Meme Stock ETF (MEME) and Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF (FITZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


MEME

1D
1.71%
1M
21.14%
YTD
82.10%
6M
57.24%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FITZ

1D
-0.20%
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MEME vs. FITZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between MEME and FITZ is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026

0.40

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MEME vs. FITZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Meme Stock ETF (MEME) and Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF (FITZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

MEME vs. FITZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MEMEFITZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

-7.29

+7.62

Drawdowns

MEME vs. FITZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MEME drawdown since its inception was -48.78%, which is greater than FITZ's maximum drawdown of -1.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MEME and FITZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MEMEFITZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.78%

-1.97%

-46.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.32%

-1.97%

-2.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.74%

-1.08%

-28.66%

Volatility

MEME vs. FITZ - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MEMEFITZDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

73.99%

8.74%

+65.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

73.99%

8.74%

+65.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

73.99%

8.74%

+65.25%

MEME vs. FITZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

MEME has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than FITZ's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

MEME vs. FITZ - Dividend Comparison

Neither MEME nor FITZ has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


MEME and FITZ have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MEME is cheaper at 0.69% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MEME is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for FITZ.

MEME and FITZ have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Nicholas. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for MEME and 0.75% for FITZ.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MEME and FITZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer