FITZ vs. GRW

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FITZ (Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF) and GRW (TCW Durable Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.

Performance

FITZ vs. GRW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF (FITZ) and TCW Durable Growth ETF (GRW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

FITZ

• 1D: -0.95%
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GRW

• 1D: -0.32%
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FITZ vs. GRW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
FITZ Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF	-1.46%
GRW TCW Durable Growth ETF	1.29%

Correlation

The correlation between FITZ and GRW is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026	0.80

Return for Risk

FITZ vs. GRW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF (FITZ) and TCW Durable Growth ETF (GRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FITZ	GRW	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-6.98	14.00	-20.98

Drawdowns

FITZ vs. GRW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FITZ drawdown since its inception was -1.77%, which is greater than GRW's maximum drawdown of -0.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FITZ and GRW.

Drawdown Indicators

	FITZ	GRW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-1.77%	-0.45%	-1.32%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.77%	-0.45%	-1.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.86%	-0.14%	-0.72%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FITZ	GRW	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.00%	10.19%	-0.19%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.00%	10.19%	-0.19%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.00%	10.19%	-0.19%

FITZ vs. GRW - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FITZ and GRW have an expense ratio of 0.75%.

Dividends

FITZ vs. GRW - Dividend Comparison

Neither FITZ nor GRW has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FITZ and GRW in my portfolio?

FITZ and GRW have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FITZ or GRW?

Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FITZ or GRW?

FITZ and GRW have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FITZ or GRW?

FITZ and GRW have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between FITZ and GRW?

They also come from different issuers: Nicholas and TCW.