PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
MDY vs. XMHQ
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between MDY and XMHQ is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.00.8

Performance

MDY vs. XMHQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF (MDY) and Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF (XMHQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
10.03%
5.82%
MDY
XMHQ

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

MDY:

1.32

XMHQ:

1.16

Sortino Ratio

MDY:

1.89

XMHQ:

1.71

Omega Ratio

MDY:

1.23

XMHQ:

1.20

Calmar Ratio

MDY:

2.50

XMHQ:

2.07

Martin Ratio

MDY:

6.19

XMHQ:

4.33

Ulcer Index

MDY:

3.41%

XMHQ:

4.92%

Daily Std Dev

MDY:

15.96%

XMHQ:

18.30%

Max Drawdown

MDY:

-55.33%

XMHQ:

-58.19%

Current Drawdown

MDY:

-3.12%

XMHQ:

-4.82%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MDY achieves a 5.09% return, which is significantly lower than XMHQ's 5.49% return. Over the past 10 years, MDY has underperformed XMHQ with an annualized return of 9.95%, while XMHQ has yielded a comparatively higher 12.15% annualized return.


MDY

YTD

5.09%

1M

4.72%

6M

10.03%

1Y

20.24%

5Y*

11.20%

10Y*

9.95%

XMHQ

YTD

5.49%

1M

4.36%

6M

5.82%

1Y

20.67%

5Y*

16.32%

10Y*

12.15%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MDY vs. XMHQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

MDY has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is lower than XMHQ's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


XMHQ
Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF
Expense ratio chart for XMHQ: current value at 0.25% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.25%
Expense ratio chart for MDY: current value at 0.23% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.23%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

MDY vs. XMHQ — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MDY
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MDY is 5656
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MDY is 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MDY is 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MDY is 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MDY is 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MDY is 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

XMHQ
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of XMHQ is 4949
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of XMHQ is 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of XMHQ is 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of XMHQ is 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of XMHQ is 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of XMHQ is 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

MDY vs. XMHQ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF (MDY) and Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF (XMHQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for MDY, currently valued at 1.32, compared to the broader market0.002.004.001.321.16
The chart of Sortino ratio for MDY, currently valued at 1.89, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.001.891.71
The chart of Omega ratio for MDY, currently valued at 1.23, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.231.20
The chart of Calmar ratio for MDY, currently valued at 2.50, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.002.502.07
The chart of Martin ratio for MDY, currently valued at 6.19, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.006.194.33
MDY
XMHQ

The current MDY Sharpe Ratio is 1.32, which is comparable to the XMHQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MDY and XMHQ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.501.001.502.002.50AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
1.32
1.16
MDY
XMHQ

Dividends

MDY vs. XMHQ - Dividend Comparison

MDY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.13%, less than XMHQ's 4.93% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
MDY
SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF
1.13%1.18%1.21%1.37%0.96%1.12%1.34%1.39%1.18%1.31%1.35%1.17%
XMHQ
Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF
4.93%5.20%0.73%1.72%1.00%1.12%1.22%1.59%1.06%1.64%1.34%1.25%

Drawdowns

MDY vs. XMHQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MDY drawdown since its inception was -55.33%, roughly equal to the maximum XMHQ drawdown of -58.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDY and XMHQ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-3.12%
-4.82%
MDY
XMHQ

Volatility

MDY vs. XMHQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF (MDY) is 3.67%, while Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF (XMHQ) has a volatility of 3.92%. This indicates that MDY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XMHQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%9.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
3.67%
3.92%
MDY
XMHQ
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab