MDY vs. VIG
MDY (SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF) and VIG (Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MDY is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Index, while VIG is a Dividend fund tracking the S&P U.S. Dividend Growers Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, MDY returned 11.33%/yr vs 13.24%/yr for VIG. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MDY charges 0.23%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for VIG.
Performance
MDY vs. VIG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MDY achieves a 15.28% return, which is significantly higher than VIG's 7.68% return. Over the past 10 years, MDY has underperformed VIG with an annualized return of 11.33%, while VIG has yielded a comparatively higher 13.24% annualized return.
MDY
- 1D
- 0.71%
- 1M
- 3.51%
- YTD
- 15.28%
- 6M
- 13.84%
- 1Y
- 27.52%
- 3Y*
- 15.07%
- 5Y*
- 7.99%
- 10Y*
- 11.33%
VIG
- 1D
- 0.53%
- 1M
- 2.11%
- YTD
- 7.68%
- 6M
- 6.99%
- 1Y
- 19.52%
- 3Y*
- 15.98%
- 5Y*
- 10.74%
- 10Y*
- 13.24%
MDY vs. VIG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MDY SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF | 15.28% | 7.19% | 13.64% | 16.07% | -13.28% | 24.53% | 13.50% | 25.78% | -11.29% | 15.93% |
VIG Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF | 7.68% | 14.17% | 16.99% | 14.51% | -9.80% | 23.76% | 15.43% | 29.62% | -2.08% | 22.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between MDY and VIG is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 27, 2006 | 0.86 |
The correlation between MDY and VIG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.
MDY vs. VIG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MDY
VIG
Industrials
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Real Estate
-
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Communication Services
Industrials
MDY
VIG
Technology
MDY
VIG
Financial Services
MDY
VIG
Consumer Cyclical
MDY
VIG
Healthcare
MDY
VIG
Real Estate
MDY
VIG
-
Energy
MDY
VIG
Basic Materials
MDY
VIG
Consumer Defensive
MDY
VIG
Utilities
MDY
VIG
Communication Services
MDY
VIG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MDY vs. VIG — Risk / Return Rank
MDY
VIG
MDY vs. VIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF (MDY) and Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MDY | VIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.32 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.91 | 2.32 | +0.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.60 | 9.34 | +1.26 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MDY vs. VIG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MDY drawdown since its inception was -55.33%, which is greater than VIG's maximum drawdown of -46.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDY and VIG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MDY | VIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.33% | -46.81% | -8.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.82% | -7.91% | -0.91% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.03% | -14.95% | -9.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.03% | -20.39% | -3.64% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.22% | -31.72% | -10.50% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.33% | +0.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.02% | -5.51% | -1.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.42% | 1.96% | +0.46% |
Volatility
MDY vs. VIG - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF (MDY) has a higher volatility of 5.04% compared to Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG) at 2.93%. This indicates that MDY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VIG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MDY | VIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.04% | 2.93% | +2.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.68% | 7.78% | +3.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.83% | 10.19% | +5.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.82% | 14.25% | +5.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.21% | 16.06% | +5.15% |
MDY vs. VIG - Expense Ratio Comparison
MDY has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is higher than VIG's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
MDY vs. VIG - Dividend Comparison
MDY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, less than VIG's 1.47% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MDY SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF | 1.03% | 1.15% | 1.18% | 1.21% | 1.37% | 0.96% | 1.12% | 1.34% | 1.39% | 1.18% | 1.31% | 1.35% |
VIG Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF | 1.47% | 1.62% | 1.73% | 1.88% | 1.96% | 1.55% | 1.63% | 1.71% | 2.08% | 1.88% | 2.14% | 2.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MDY and VIG have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MDY has higher volatility (5.04%) compared to VIG (2.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MDY dropped -55.33% vs VIG's -46.81%.
On 10-year performance, VIG leads with 13.24% vs 11.33% for MDY. On fees, VIG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VIG has been the lower-risk option at 2.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VIG has performed better with a 13.24% return vs 11.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VIG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.23% for MDY.
VIG has the higher dividend yield at 1.47%, compared with 1.03% for MDY.
MDY is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while VIG is Dividend. MDY tracks S&P MidCap 400 Index, while VIG tracks S&P U.S. Dividend Growers Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for MDY and 0.04% for VIG.
VIG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs 1.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MDY and VIG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer