MDY vs. EFA
MDY (SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF) and EFA (iShares MSCI EAFE ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MDY is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Index, while EFA is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI EAFE Index (Net). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, MDY returned 11.33%/yr vs 9.84%/yr for EFA. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MDY charges 0.23%/yr vs 0.32%/yr for EFA.
Performance
MDY vs. EFA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MDY achieves a 15.28% return, which is significantly higher than EFA's 9.36% return. Over the past 10 years, MDY has outperformed EFA with an annualized return of 11.33%, while EFA has yielded a comparatively lower 9.84% annualized return.
MDY
- 1D
- 0.71%
- 1M
- 3.51%
- YTD
- 15.28%
- 6M
- 13.84%
- 1Y
- 27.52%
- 3Y*
- 15.07%
- 5Y*
- 7.99%
- 10Y*
- 11.33%
EFA
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- 1.51%
- YTD
- 9.36%
- 6M
- 10.80%
- 1Y
- 21.90%
- 3Y*
- 16.14%
- 5Y*
- 8.36%
- 10Y*
- 9.84%
MDY vs. EFA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MDY SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF | 15.28% | 7.19% | 13.64% | 16.07% | -13.28% | 24.53% | 13.50% | 25.78% | -11.29% | 15.93% |
EFA iShares MSCI EAFE ETF | 9.36% | 31.55% | 3.49% | 18.36% | -14.39% | 11.45% | 7.60% | 22.04% | -13.82% | 25.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between MDY and EFA is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 17, 2001 | 0.76 |
The correlation between MDY and EFA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.
MDY vs. EFA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MDY
EFA
Industrials
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Real Estate
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Communication Services
Industrials
MDY
EFA
Technology
MDY
EFA
Financial Services
MDY
EFA
Consumer Cyclical
MDY
EFA
Healthcare
MDY
EFA
Real Estate
MDY
EFA
Energy
MDY
EFA
Basic Materials
MDY
EFA
Consumer Defensive
MDY
EFA
Utilities
MDY
EFA
Communication Services
MDY
EFA
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MDY vs. EFA — Risk / Return Rank
MDY
EFA
MDY vs. EFA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF (MDY) and iShares MSCI EAFE ETF (EFA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MDY | EFA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.24 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.91 | 1.79 | +1.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.60 | 6.67 | +3.93 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MDY vs. EFA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MDY drawdown since its inception was -55.33%, smaller than the maximum EFA drawdown of -61.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDY and EFA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MDY | EFA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.33% | -61.04% | +5.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.82% | -11.42% | +2.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.03% | -14.05% | -9.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.03% | -29.53% | +5.50% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.22% | -34.19% | -8.03% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.61% | +0.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.02% | -11.92% | +4.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.42% | 3.07% | -0.65% |
Volatility
MDY vs. EFA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF (MDY) is 5.04%, while iShares MSCI EAFE ETF (EFA) has a volatility of 5.50%. This indicates that MDY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EFA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MDY | EFA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.04% | 5.50% | -0.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.68% | 13.19% | -1.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.83% | 15.64% | +0.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.82% | 16.58% | +3.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.21% | 17.27% | +3.94% |
MDY vs. EFA - Expense Ratio Comparison
MDY has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is lower than EFA's 0.32% expense ratio.
Dividends
MDY vs. EFA - Dividend Comparison
MDY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, less than EFA's 3.09% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFA iShares MSCI EAFE ETF | 3.09% | 3.38% | 3.24% | 2.98% | 2.69% | 3.33% | 2.13% | 3.10% | 3.39% | 2.57% | 3.07% | 2.76% |
MDY SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF | 1.03% | 1.15% | 1.18% | 1.21% | 1.37% | 0.96% | 1.12% | 1.34% | 1.39% | 1.18% | 1.31% | 1.35% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MDY and EFA have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EFA has higher volatility (5.50%) compared to MDY (5.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MDY dropped -55.33% vs EFA's -61.04%.
On 10-year performance, MDY leads with 11.33% vs 9.84% for EFA. On fees, MDY is cheaper at 0.23% per year. On volatility, MDY has been the lower-risk option at 5.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, MDY has performed better with a 11.33% return vs 9.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MDY is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for EFA.
EFA has the higher dividend yield at 3.09%, compared with 1.03% for MDY.
MDY is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while EFA is Foreign Large Cap Equities. MDY tracks S&P MidCap 400 Index, while EFA tracks MSCI EAFE Index (Net). They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for MDY and 0.32% for EFA.
MDY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.62 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MDY and EFA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer