EFA vs. EFO
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI EAFE ETF (EFA) and ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE (EFO).
EFA and EFO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EFA is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI EAFE Index. It was launched on Aug 14, 2001. EFO is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI EAFE Index (200%). It was launched on Jun 2, 2009. Both EFA and EFO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: EFA or EFO.
Correlation
The correlation between EFA and EFO is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
EFA vs. EFO - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
EFA:
0.47
EFO:
0.14
EFA:
0.74
EFO:
0.38
EFA:
1.09
EFO:
1.05
EFA:
0.63
EFO:
0.16
EFA:
1.47
EFO:
0.42
EFA:
4.35%
EFO:
9.30%
EFA:
13.62%
EFO:
27.18%
EFA:
-61.04%
EFO:
-63.53%
EFA:
-3.36%
EFO:
-10.95%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EFA achieves a 8.50% return, which is significantly lower than EFO's 15.89% return. Over the past 10 years, EFA has outperformed EFO with an annualized return of 5.34%, while EFO has yielded a comparatively lower 3.53% annualized return.
EFA
8.50%
-0.53%
0.38%
7.15%
13.29%
5.34%
EFO
15.89%
-1.59%
-3.18%
5.40%
18.44%
3.53%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EFA vs. EFO - Expense Ratio Comparison
EFA has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is lower than EFO's 0.95% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
EFA vs. EFO — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
EFA
EFO
EFA vs. EFO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EAFE ETF (EFA) and ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE (EFO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
EFA vs. EFO - Dividend Comparison
EFA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.99%, more than EFO's 1.89% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFA iShares MSCI EAFE ETF | 2.99% | 3.24% | 2.98% | 2.69% | 3.33% | 2.13% | 3.10% | 3.39% | 2.57% | 3.07% | 2.76% | 3.72% |
EFO ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE | 1.89% | 2.24% | 1.93% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.37% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
EFA vs. EFO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EFA drawdown since its inception was -61.04%, roughly equal to the maximum EFO drawdown of -63.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFA and EFO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
EFA vs. EFO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI EAFE ETF (EFA) is 5.01%, while ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE (EFO) has a volatility of 9.92%. This indicates that EFA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EFO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.