EFA vs. IEFA
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI EAFE ETF (EFA) and iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF (IEFA).
EFA and IEFA are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EFA is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI EAFE Index. It was launched on Aug 14, 2001. IEFA is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI EAFE Investable Market Index. It was launched on Oct 18, 2012. Both EFA and IEFA are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: EFA or IEFA.
Correlation
The correlation between EFA and IEFA is 0.99, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
EFA vs. IEFA - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
EFA:
0.66
IEFA:
0.65
EFA:
0.97
IEFA:
0.97
EFA:
1.12
IEFA:
1.12
EFA:
0.82
IEFA:
0.80
EFA:
2.00
IEFA:
1.97
EFA:
4.16%
IEFA:
4.18%
EFA:
12.67%
IEFA:
12.72%
EFA:
-61.04%
IEFA:
-34.79%
EFA:
-7.82%
IEFA:
-7.95%
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with EFA having a 1.55% return and IEFA slightly lower at 1.54%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with EFA having a 5.26% annualized return and IEFA not far ahead at 5.50%.
EFA
1.55%
1.95%
-2.14%
7.11%
4.74%
5.26%
IEFA
1.54%
1.86%
-2.03%
7.07%
4.56%
5.50%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EFA vs. IEFA - Expense Ratio Comparison
EFA has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is higher than IEFA's 0.07% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
EFA vs. IEFA — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
EFA
IEFA
EFA vs. IEFA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EAFE ETF (EFA) and iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF (IEFA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
EFA vs. IEFA - Dividend Comparison
EFA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.19%, less than IEFA's 3.42% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFA iShares MSCI EAFE ETF | 3.19% | 3.24% | 2.98% | 2.69% | 3.33% | 2.13% | 3.10% | 3.39% | 2.57% | 3.07% | 2.76% | 3.72% |
IEFA iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF | 3.42% | 3.47% | 3.20% | 2.70% | 3.32% | 1.90% | 3.18% | 3.46% | 2.57% | 2.96% | 2.63% | 3.10% |
Drawdowns
EFA vs. IEFA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EFA drawdown since its inception was -61.04%, which is greater than IEFA's maximum drawdown of -34.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFA and IEFA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
EFA vs. IEFA - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI EAFE ETF (EFA) and iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF (IEFA) have volatilities of 3.75% and 3.71%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.