MCH vs. CNXT
Compare and contrast key facts about Matthews China Active ETF (MCH) and VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF (CNXT).
MCH and CNXT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. MCH is an actively managed fund by Matthews. It was launched on Jul 13, 2022. CNXT is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the SME-ChiNext 100 Index. It was launched on Jul 24, 2014.
Performance
MCH vs. CNXT - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MCH vs. CNXT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MCH Matthews China Active ETF | -6.13% | 30.20% | 17.32% | -19.91% | -3.12% |
CNXT VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF | 3.20% | 59.31% | 12.42% | -21.47% | -19.36% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MCH achieves a -6.13% return, which is significantly lower than CNXT's 3.20% return.
MCH
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- -6.56%
- YTD
- -6.13%
- 6M
- -11.68%
- 1Y
- 10.36%
- 3Y*
- 4.84%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CNXT
- 1D
- -0.62%
- 1M
- -2.00%
- YTD
- 3.20%
- 6M
- 2.49%
- 1Y
- 65.33%
- 3Y*
- 12.24%
- 5Y*
- 1.47%
- 10Y*
- 3.87%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MCH vs. CNXT - Expense Ratio Comparison
MCH has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than CNXT's 0.65% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MCH vs. CNXT — Risk / Return Rank
MCH
CNXT
MCH vs. CNXT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Matthews China Active ETF (MCH) and VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF (CNXT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MCH | CNXT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.44 | 2.06 | -1.62 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.74 | 2.57 | -1.83 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.36 | -0.26 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.61 | 3.71 | -3.11 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.90 | 13.62 | -11.73 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MCH | CNXT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 | 2.06 | -1.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.04 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.12 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.10 | 0.16 | -0.07 |
Correlation
The correlation between MCH and CNXT is 0.72, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
MCH vs. CNXT - Dividend Comparison
MCH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.88%, more than CNXT's 0.17% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MCH Matthews China Active ETF | 1.88% | 1.76% | 1.31% | 1.62% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CNXT VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF | 0.17% | 0.18% | 0.15% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 9.22% | 0.01% | 0.45% | 0.00% | 0.19% |
Drawdowns
MCH vs. CNXT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MCH drawdown since its inception was -40.53%, smaller than the maximum CNXT drawdown of -68.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MCH and CNXT.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MCH | CNXT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.53% | -68.98% | +28.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.61% | -17.35% | -0.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -61.21% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -63.30% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.80% | -24.37% | +11.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.06% | -43.41% | +24.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.64% | 4.73% | +0.91% |
Volatility
MCH vs. CNXT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Matthews China Active ETF (MCH) is 6.96%, while VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF (CNXT) has a volatility of 7.46%. This indicates that MCH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CNXT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MCH | CNXT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.96% | 7.46% | -0.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.52% | 19.80% | -5.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.81% | 31.89% | -8.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.85% | 34.92% | -5.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.85% | 31.54% | -1.69% |