MCH vs. KWEB
Compare and contrast key facts about Matthews China Active ETF (MCH) and KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB).
MCH and KWEB are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. MCH is an actively managed fund by Matthews Asia. It was launched on Jul 13, 2022. KWEB is a passively managed fund by CICC that tracks the performance of the CSI Overseas China Internet. It was launched on Jul 31, 2013.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: MCH or KWEB.
Correlation
The correlation between MCH and KWEB is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
MCH vs. KWEB - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
MCH:
1.07
KWEB:
1.15
MCH:
1.75
KWEB:
1.86
MCH:
1.24
KWEB:
1.23
MCH:
1.01
KWEB:
0.61
MCH:
2.41
KWEB:
3.04
MCH:
15.32%
KWEB:
14.75%
MCH:
34.49%
KWEB:
38.90%
MCH:
-40.53%
KWEB:
-80.92%
MCH:
-14.96%
KWEB:
-61.20%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MCH achieves a 11.68% return, which is significantly lower than KWEB's 21.72% return.
MCH
11.68%
11.82%
32.92%
35.35%
N/A
N/A
KWEB
21.72%
20.56%
40.77%
44.99%
-4.69%
2.49%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MCH vs. KWEB - Expense Ratio Comparison
MCH has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than KWEB's 0.76% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
MCH vs. KWEB — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
MCH
KWEB
MCH vs. KWEB - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Matthews China Active ETF (MCH) and KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
MCH vs. KWEB - Dividend Comparison
MCH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%, less than KWEB's 2.88% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MCH Matthews China Active ETF | 1.18% | 1.32% | 1.62% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
KWEB KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF | 2.88% | 3.51% | 1.71% | 0.00% | 7.07% | 0.29% | 0.08% | 3.40% | 0.58% | 1.19% | 0.46% | 0.89% |
Drawdowns
MCH vs. KWEB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MCH drawdown since its inception was -40.53%, smaller than the maximum KWEB drawdown of -80.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MCH and KWEB. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
MCH vs. KWEB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Matthews China Active ETF (MCH) is 6.54%, while KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB) has a volatility of 10.32%. This indicates that MCH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KWEB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.