MCH vs. KWEB
Compare and contrast key facts about Matthews China Active ETF (MCH) and KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB).
MCH and KWEB are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. MCH is an actively managed fund by Matthews Asia. It was launched on Jul 13, 2022. KWEB is a passively managed fund by CICC that tracks the performance of the CSI Overseas China Internet. It was launched on Jul 31, 2013.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: MCH or KWEB.
Correlation
The correlation between MCH and KWEB is 0.20, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
MCH vs. KWEB - Performance Comparison
Loading data...
Key characteristics
MCH:
23.04%
KWEB:
30.31%
MCH:
-1.71%
KWEB:
-3.09%
MCH:
-1.06%
KWEB:
-3.09%
Returns By Period
MCH
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
KWEB
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MCH vs. KWEB - Expense Ratio Comparison
MCH has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than KWEB's 0.76% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
MCH vs. KWEB — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
MCH
KWEB
MCH vs. KWEB - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Matthews China Active ETF (MCH) and KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Loading data...
Dividends
MCH vs. KWEB - Dividend Comparison
MCH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.25%, while KWEB has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|
MCH Matthews China Active ETF | 1.25% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
KWEB KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
MCH vs. KWEB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MCH drawdown since its inception was -1.71%, smaller than the maximum KWEB drawdown of -3.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MCH and KWEB. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Loading data...
Volatility
MCH vs. KWEB - Volatility Comparison
Loading data...