PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
MCH vs. MCHI
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between MCH and MCHI is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.01.0

Performance

MCH vs. MCHI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Matthews China Active ETF (MCH) and iShares MSCI China ETF (MCHI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%50.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
33.75%
33.67%
MCH
MCHI

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

MCH:

1.19

MCHI:

1.54

Sortino Ratio

MCH:

1.89

MCHI:

2.25

Omega Ratio

MCH:

1.26

MCHI:

1.30

Calmar Ratio

MCH:

1.13

MCHI:

0.84

Martin Ratio

MCH:

2.67

MCHI:

3.82

Ulcer Index

MCH:

15.35%

MCHI:

12.66%

Daily Std Dev

MCH:

34.45%

MCHI:

31.35%

Max Drawdown

MCH:

-40.53%

MCHI:

-62.84%

Current Drawdown

MCH:

-13.51%

MCHI:

-37.41%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MCH achieves a 13.59% return, which is significantly lower than MCHI's 19.01% return.


MCH

YTD

13.59%

1M

14.36%

6M

33.74%

1Y

35.94%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

MCHI

YTD

19.01%

1M

20.43%

6M

33.67%

1Y

43.54%

5Y*

-0.88%

10Y*

2.46%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MCH vs. MCHI - Expense Ratio Comparison

MCH has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than MCHI's 0.59% expense ratio.


MCH
Matthews China Active ETF
Expense ratio chart for MCH: current value at 0.79% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.79%
Expense ratio chart for MCHI: current value at 0.59% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.59%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

MCH vs. MCHI — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MCH
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MCH is 4848
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MCH is 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MCH is 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MCH is 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MCH is 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MCH is 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

MCHI
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MCHI is 5757
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MCHI is 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MCHI is 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MCHI is 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MCHI is 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MCHI is 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

MCH vs. MCHI - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Matthews China Active ETF (MCH) and iShares MSCI China ETF (MCHI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for MCH, currently valued at 1.19, compared to the broader market0.002.004.001.191.54
The chart of Sortino ratio for MCH, currently valued at 1.89, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.001.892.25
The chart of Omega ratio for MCH, currently valued at 1.26, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.261.30
The chart of Calmar ratio for MCH, currently valued at 1.13, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.001.131.66
The chart of Martin ratio for MCH, currently valued at 2.67, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.002.673.82
MCH
MCHI

The current MCH Sharpe Ratio is 1.19, which is comparable to the MCHI Sharpe Ratio of 1.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MCH and MCHI, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.001.50SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
1.19
1.54
MCH
MCHI

Dividends

MCH vs. MCHI - Dividend Comparison

MCH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.16%, less than MCHI's 1.94% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
MCH
Matthews China Active ETF
1.16%1.32%1.62%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MCHI
iShares MSCI China ETF
1.94%2.31%3.49%2.16%1.04%1.04%1.45%1.60%1.56%1.66%2.76%2.35%

Drawdowns

MCH vs. MCHI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MCH drawdown since its inception was -40.53%, smaller than the maximum MCHI drawdown of -62.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MCH and MCHI. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-13.51%
-4.75%
MCH
MCHI

Volatility

MCH vs. MCHI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Matthews China Active ETF (MCH) is 6.53%, while iShares MSCI China ETF (MCHI) has a volatility of 7.00%. This indicates that MCH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MCHI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
6.53%
7.00%
MCH
MCHI
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab