PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MCB vs. FUNC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MCB vs. FUNC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Metropolitan Bank Holding Corp. (MCB) and First United Corporation (FUNC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MCB achieves a 22.19% return, which is significantly higher than FUNC's 20.19% return.


MCB

1D
0.01%
1M
-5.79%
6M
0.53%
YTD
22.19%
1Y
36.00%
3Y*
26.71%
5Y*
5.70%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
10.58%

FUNC

1D
0.68%
1M
-0.30%
6M
16.63%
YTD
20.19%
1Y
41.62%
3Y*
41.38%
5Y*
24.66%
10Y*
18.95%
ALL TIME*
5.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.53M$1.27M$1.04M
$19.86M$15.77M$13.27M

MCB vs. FUNC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MCB
Metropolitan Bank Holding Corp.
22.19%31.32%5.45%-5.61%-44.93%193.71%-24.80%56.34%-26.72%8.09%
FUNC
First United Corporation
20.19%14.29%48.25%25.24%8.04%25.12%-33.27%54.43%-7.20%-2.25%

Correlation

The correlation between MCB and FUNC is 0.61, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 2017

0.32

Over the past year, MCB and FUNC have become more correlated (0.61) than their long-term average of 0.32, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MCB:

$967.30M

FUNC:

$284.87M

EPS

MCB:

$8.01

FUNC:

$3.90

PE Ratio

MCB:

11.55

FUNC:

11.31

PEG Ratio

MCB:

5.64

FUNC:

0.95

PS Ratio

MCB:

1.82

FUNC:

2.36

Total Revenue (TTM)

MCB:

$550.95M

FUNC:

$121.46M

Gross Profit (TTM)

MCB:

$141.54M

FUNC:

$86.21M

EBITDA (TTM)

MCB:

$168.76M

FUNC:

$36.69M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MCB vs. FUNC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MCB
MCB Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
MCB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MCB Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
MCB Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
MCB Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
MCB Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

FUNC
FUNC Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
FUNC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FUNC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
FUNC Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
FUNC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
FUNC Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MCB vs. FUNC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Metropolitan Bank Holding Corp. (MCB) and First United Corporation (FUNC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MCBFUNCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.26

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.75

2.74

-0.99

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.01

6.03

-2.03

MCB vs. FUNC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MCB Sharpe Ratio is 0.96, which is comparable to the FUNC Sharpe Ratio of 1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MCB and FUNC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MCB vs. FUNC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MCB drawdown since its inception was -82.30%, roughly equal to the maximum FUNC drawdown of -85.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MCB and FUNC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MCBFUNCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.30%

-85.84%

+3.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.71%

-13.90%

-4.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-42.34%

-37.76%

-4.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-82.30%

-44.90%

-37.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-54.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.51%

-3.87%

-12.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-33.17%

-30.85%

-2.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.16%

6.31%

+1.85%

Volatility

MCB vs. FUNC - Volatility Comparison

Metropolitan Bank Holding Corp. (MCB) has a higher volatility of 11.64% compared to First United Corporation (FUNC) at 6.58%. This indicates that MCB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FUNC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MCBFUNCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.64%

6.58%

+5.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.11%

17.12%

+4.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

34.14%

28.25%

+5.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

58.85%

29.72%

+29.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

56.00%

32.82%

+23.18%

Dividends

MCB vs. FUNC - Dividend Comparison

MCB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, less than FUNC's 2.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
FUNC
First United Corporation
2.36%2.46%2.43%3.32%3.05%3.09%3.35%1.66%1.70%
MCB
Metropolitan Bank Holding Corp.
1.03%0.39%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

MCB vs. FUNC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Metropolitan Bank Holding Corp. and First United Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

MCB vs. FUNC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Metropolitan Bank Holding Corp. and First United Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

MCB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Metropolitan Bank Holding Corp. reported a gross profit of -90.79M and revenue of 138.36M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -65.6%.

FUNC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, First United Corporation reported a gross profit of 22.41M and revenue of 30.93M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 72.5%.

MCB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Metropolitan Bank Holding Corp. reported an operating income of -44.39M and revenue of 138.36M, resulting in an operating margin of -32.1%.

FUNC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, First United Corporation reported an operating income of 8.84M and revenue of 30.93M, resulting in an operating margin of 28.6%.

MCB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Metropolitan Bank Holding Corp. reported a net income of 19.22M and revenue of 138.36M, resulting in a net margin of 13.9%.

FUNC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, First United Corporation reported a net income of 6.66M and revenue of 30.93M, resulting in a net margin of 21.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


MCB and FUNC have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MCB has higher volatility (11.64%) compared to FUNC (6.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MCB dropped -82.30% vs FUNC's -85.84%.

FUNC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.35 vs 0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MCB and FUNC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer