PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MCB vs. FUNC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MCB vs. FUNC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Metropolitan Bank Holding Corp. (MCB) and First United Corporation (FUNC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MCB achieves a 14.79% return, which is significantly higher than FUNC's 5.70% return.


MCB

1D
-3.19%
1M
-0.80%
YTD
14.79%
6M
14.22%
1Y
35.23%
3Y*
42.93%
5Y*
6.21%
10Y*

FUNC

1D
0.44%
1M
4.81%
YTD
5.70%
6M
3.82%
1Y
34.36%
3Y*
47.89%
5Y*
19.99%
10Y*
17.18%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MCB vs. FUNC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MCB
Metropolitan Bank Holding Corp.
14.79%31.32%5.45%-5.61%-44.93%193.71%-24.80%56.34%-26.72%13.14%
FUNC
First United Corporation
5.70%14.29%48.25%25.24%8.04%25.12%-33.27%54.43%-7.20%-1.69%

Correlation

The correlation between MCB and FUNC is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.48

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2017

0.31

Over the past year, MCB and FUNC have become more correlated (0.61) than their long-term average of 0.31, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

EPS

MCB:

$8.12

FUNC:

$5.20

PE Ratio

MCB:

10.74

FUNC:

7.51

PEG Ratio

MCB:

5.24

FUNC:

0.63

PS Ratio

MCB:

1.71

FUNC:

2.10

Total Revenue (TTM)

MCB:

$539.67M

FUNC:

$90.53M

Gross Profit (TTM)

MCB:

$211.43M

FUNC:

$63.80M

EBITDA (TTM)

MCB:

$72.78M

FUNC:

$31.63M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MCB vs. FUNC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MCB
MCB Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
MCB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MCB Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
MCB Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
MCB Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
MCB Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

FUNC
FUNC Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
FUNC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FUNC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
FUNC Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
FUNC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
FUNC Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MCB vs. FUNC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Metropolitan Bank Holding Corp. (MCB) and First United Corporation (FUNC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MCBFUNCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.06

1.20

-0.14

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.70

1.92

-0.21

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.24

-0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.89

2.41

-0.52

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.24

5.13

-0.90

MCB vs. FUNC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MCB Sharpe Ratio is 1.06, which is comparable to the FUNC Sharpe Ratio of 1.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MCB and FUNC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MCBFUNCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.06

1.20

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

0.68

-0.57

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.19

0.11

+0.08

Drawdowns

MCB vs. FUNC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MCB drawdown since its inception was -82.30%, roughly equal to the maximum FUNC drawdown of -85.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MCB and FUNC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MCBFUNCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.30%

-85.84%

+3.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.71%

-13.90%

-4.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-42.34%

-37.76%

-4.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-82.30%

-44.90%

-37.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-54.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.56%

-3.62%

-17.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-33.54%

-30.99%

-2.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.34%

6.54%

+1.80%

Volatility

MCB vs. FUNC - Volatility Comparison

Metropolitan Bank Holding Corp. (MCB) has a higher volatility of 7.61% compared to First United Corporation (FUNC) at 5.95%. This indicates that MCB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FUNC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MCBFUNCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.61%

5.95%

+1.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.76%

17.16%

+7.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

33.35%

28.67%

+4.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

58.95%

29.58%

+29.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

56.32%

32.68%

+23.64%

Dividends

MCB vs. FUNC - Dividend Comparison

MCB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.86%, less than FUNC's 2.56% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
FUNC
First United Corporation
2.56%2.46%2.43%3.32%3.05%3.09%3.35%1.66%1.70%
MCB
Metropolitan Bank Holding Corp.
0.86%0.39%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

MCB vs. FUNC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Metropolitan Bank Holding Corp. and First United Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M150.00M20222023202420252026
134.93M
0
(MCB) Total Revenue
(FUNC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


MCB and FUNC have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MCB has higher volatility (7.61%) compared to FUNC (5.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MCB dropped -82.30% vs FUNC's -85.84%.

FUNC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.20 vs 1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MCB and FUNC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer