PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MCB vs. C
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MCB vs. C - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Metropolitan Bank Holding Corp. (MCB) and Citigroup Inc. (C). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MCB achieves a 14.79% return, which is significantly higher than C's 12.46% return.


MCB

1D
-3.19%
1M
-0.80%
YTD
14.79%
6M
14.22%
1Y
35.23%
3Y*
42.93%
5Y*
6.21%
10Y*

C

1D
-1.01%
1M
3.42%
YTD
12.46%
6M
22.96%
1Y
73.63%
3Y*
45.73%
5Y*
14.21%
10Y*
14.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MCB vs. C - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MCB
Metropolitan Bank Holding Corp.
14.79%31.32%5.45%-5.61%-44.93%193.71%-24.80%56.34%-26.72%13.14%
C
Citigroup Inc.
12.46%70.38%41.93%18.98%-22.09%0.93%-19.70%57.82%-28.49%2.86%

Correlation

The correlation between MCB and C is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2017

0.50

The correlation between MCB and C has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.42 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MCB:

$938.06M

C:

$230.76B

EPS

MCB:

$8.12

C:

$8.65

PE Ratio

MCB:

10.74

C:

15.02

PS Ratio

MCB:

1.71

C:

1.40

PB Ratio

MCB:

0.99

C:

1.21

Total Revenue (TTM)

MCB:

$539.67M

C:

$171.19B

Gross Profit (TTM)

MCB:

$211.43M

C:

$77.85B

EBITDA (TTM)

MCB:

$72.78M

C:

$24.12B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MCB vs. C — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MCB
MCB Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
MCB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MCB Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
MCB Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
MCB Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
MCB Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

C
C Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
C Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
C Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
C Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
C Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
C Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MCB vs. C - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Metropolitan Bank Holding Corp. (MCB) and Citigroup Inc. (C). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MCBCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.06

2.66

-1.59

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.70

3.30

-1.60

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.42

-0.21

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.89

5.01

-3.12

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.24

14.45

-10.21

MCB vs. C - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MCB Sharpe Ratio is 1.06, which is lower than the C Sharpe Ratio of 2.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MCB and C, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MCBCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.06

2.66

-1.59

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

0.49

-0.38

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.19

0.15

+0.04

Drawdowns

MCB vs. C - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MCB drawdown since its inception was -82.30%, smaller than the maximum C drawdown of -98.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MCB and C.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MCBCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.30%

-98.00%

+15.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.71%

-14.76%

-3.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-42.34%

-31.31%

-11.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-82.30%

-47.56%

-34.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.56%

-65.32%

+43.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-33.54%

-43.50%

+9.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.34%

5.11%

+3.23%

Volatility

MCB vs. C - Volatility Comparison

Metropolitan Bank Holding Corp. (MCB) and Citigroup Inc. (C) have volatilities of 7.61% and 7.44%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MCBCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.61%

7.44%

+0.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.76%

22.66%

+2.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

33.35%

27.86%

+5.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

58.95%

29.11%

+29.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

56.32%

33.20%

+23.12%

Dividends

MCB vs. C - Dividend Comparison

MCB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.86%, less than C's 1.85% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
C
Citigroup Inc.
1.85%1.99%3.10%4.04%4.51%3.38%3.31%2.40%2.96%1.29%0.71%0.31%
MCB
Metropolitan Bank Holding Corp.
0.86%0.39%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

MCB vs. C - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Metropolitan Bank Holding Corp. and Citigroup Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00B20.00B30.00B40.00B20222023202420252026
134.93M
44.14B
(MCB) Total Revenue
(C) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

MCB vs. C - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Metropolitan Bank Holding Corp. and Citigroup Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%202220232024202520260
49.3%
Portfolio components
MCB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Metropolitan Bank Holding Corp. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 134.93M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

C - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Citigroup Inc. reported a gross profit of 21.76B and revenue of 44.14B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.3%.

MCB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Metropolitan Bank Holding Corp. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 134.93M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

C - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Citigroup Inc. reported an operating income of 7.52B and revenue of 44.14B, resulting in an operating margin of 17.0%.

MCB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Metropolitan Bank Holding Corp. reported a net income of 31.43M and revenue of 134.93M, resulting in a net margin of 23.3%.

C - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Citigroup Inc. reported a net income of 5.79B and revenue of 44.14B, resulting in a net margin of 13.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


MCB and C have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MCB has higher volatility (7.61%) compared to C (7.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MCB dropped -82.30% vs C's -98.00%.

C currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.66 vs 1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MCB and C

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer