MCB vs. BCS
MCB (Metropolitan Bank Holding Corp.) and BCS (Barclays PLC) are both stocks. Both are in the Financial Services sector — MCB in Banks - Regional, BCS in Banks - Diversified. Over the past 5 years, MCB returned 6.21%/yr vs 22.63%/yr for BCS. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MCB vs. BCS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MCB achieves a 14.79% return, which is significantly higher than BCS's -1.82% return.
MCB
- 1D
- -3.19%
- 1M
- -0.80%
- YTD
- 14.79%
- 6M
- 14.22%
- 1Y
- 35.23%
- 3Y*
- 42.93%
- 5Y*
- 6.21%
- 10Y*
- —
BCS
- 1D
- -2.33%
- 1M
- 8.05%
- YTD
- -1.82%
- 6M
- 7.42%
- 1Y
- 40.02%
- 3Y*
- 51.43%
- 5Y*
- 22.63%
- 10Y*
- 12.30%
MCB vs. BCS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MCB Metropolitan Bank Holding Corp. | 14.79% | 31.32% | 5.45% | -5.61% | -44.93% | 193.71% | -24.80% | 56.34% | -26.72% | 13.14% |
BCS Barclays PLC | -1.82% | 96.49% | 76.26% | 6.01% | -21.90% | 31.71% | -12.84% | 31.90% | -29.25% | 15.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between MCB and BCS is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2017 | 0.43 |
Fundamentals
MCB:
$938.06M
BCS:
$84.73B
MCB:
$8.12
BCS:
$2.06
MCB:
10.74
BCS:
12.00
MCB:
5.24
BCS:
2.17
MCB:
1.71
BCS:
3.02
MCB:
0.99
BCS:
1.11
MCB:
$539.67M
BCS:
$28.57B
MCB:
$211.43M
BCS:
$26.96B
MCB:
$72.78M
BCS:
$9.15B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MCB vs. BCS — Risk / Return Rank
MCB
BCS
MCB vs. BCS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Metropolitan Bank Holding Corp. (MCB) and Barclays PLC (BCS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MCB | BCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.06 | 1.39 | -0.33 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.70 | 1.99 | -0.29 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.24 | -0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.89 | 1.53 | +0.36 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.24 | 4.41 | -0.17 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MCB | BCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.06 | 1.39 | -0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 | 0.67 | -0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.33 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.19 | 0.18 | +0.01 |
Drawdowns
MCB vs. BCS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MCB drawdown since its inception was -82.30%, smaller than the maximum BCS drawdown of -94.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MCB and BCS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MCB | BCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.30% | -94.36% | +12.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.71% | -26.20% | +7.49% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -42.34% | -26.20% | -16.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -82.30% | -48.14% | -34.16% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -66.10% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.56% | -26.99% | +5.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -33.54% | -38.43% | +4.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.34% | 9.10% | -0.76% |
Volatility
MCB vs. BCS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Metropolitan Bank Holding Corp. (MCB) is 7.61%, while Barclays PLC (BCS) has a volatility of 10.68%. This indicates that MCB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BCS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MCB | BCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.61% | 10.68% | -3.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.76% | 23.30% | +1.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.35% | 28.85% | +4.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 58.95% | 33.97% | +24.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 56.32% | 37.72% | +18.60% |
Dividends
MCB vs. BCS - Dividend Comparison
MCB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.86%, less than BCS's 1.89% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCS Barclays PLC | 1.89% | 1.70% | 3.13% | 4.86% | 4.18% | 1.61% | 3.91% | 3.68% | 3.21% | 1.37% | 2.26% | 2.95% |
MCB Metropolitan Bank Holding Corp. | 0.86% | 0.39% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
MCB vs. BCS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Metropolitan Bank Holding Corp. and Barclays PLC. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
MCB vs. BCS - Profitability Comparison
MCB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Metropolitan Bank Holding Corp. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 134.93M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
BCS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Barclays PLC reported a gross profit of 8.16B and revenue of 8.16B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.
MCB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Metropolitan Bank Holding Corp. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 134.93M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
BCS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Barclays PLC reported an operating income of 2.81B and revenue of 8.16B, resulting in an operating margin of 34.5%.
MCB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Metropolitan Bank Holding Corp. reported a net income of 31.43M and revenue of 134.93M, resulting in a net margin of 23.3%.
BCS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Barclays PLC reported a net income of 2.18B and revenue of 8.16B, resulting in a net margin of 26.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
MCB and BCS have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BCS has higher volatility (10.68%) compared to MCB (7.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MCB dropped -82.30% vs BCS's -94.36%.
BCS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.39 vs 1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MCB and BCS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer