MCB vs. CCB
MCB (Metropolitan Bank Holding Corp.) and CCB (Coastal Financial Corporation) are both stocks. Both operate in the Banks - Regional industry within the Financial Services sector. Over the past 5 years, MCB returned 5.70%/yr vs 7.00%/yr for CCB. Their 0.48 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
MCB vs. CCB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MCB achieves a 22.19% return, which is significantly higher than CCB's -64.23% return.
MCB
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- -5.79%
- 6M
- 0.53%
- YTD
- 22.19%
- 1Y
- 36.00%
- 3Y*
- 26.71%
- 5Y*
- 5.70%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 10.58%
CCB
- 1D
- 2.71%
- 1M
- -47.68%
- 6M
- -57.20%
- YTD
- -64.23%
- 1Y
- -55.64%
- 3Y*
- -2.64%
- 5Y*
- 7.00%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 12.20%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $23.14M | $14.79M | $11.39M | |
| $19.86M | $15.77M | $13.27M |
MCB vs. CCB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MCB Metropolitan Bank Holding Corp. | 22.19% | 31.32% | 5.45% | -5.61% | -44.93% | 193.71% | -24.80% | 56.34% | -40.57% |
CCB Coastal Financial Corporation | -64.23% | 34.95% | 91.20% | -6.54% | -6.12% | 141.05% | 27.50% | 8.14% | -6.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between MCB and CCB is 0.56, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.56 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.58 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 18, 2018 | 0.48 |
The correlation between MCB and CCB shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (all time) to 0.58 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
MCB:
$967.30M
CCB:
$625.05M
MCB:
$8.01
CCB:
-$0.33
MCB:
1.82
CCB:
0.98
MCB:
$550.95M
CCB:
$485.14M
MCB:
$141.54M
CCB:
$241.13M
MCB:
$168.76M
CCB:
$54.64M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MCB vs. CCB — Risk / Return Rank
MCB
CCB
MCB vs. CCB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Metropolitan Bank Holding Corp. (MCB) and Coastal Financial Corporation (CCB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MCB | CCB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.92 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.67 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 0.78 | +0.42 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.75 | -0.87 | +2.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.01 | -2.21 | +6.22 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MCB vs. CCB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MCB drawdown since its inception was -82.30%, which is greater than CCB's maximum drawdown of -66.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MCB and CCB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MCB | CCB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.30% | -66.45% | -15.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.71% | -66.45% | +47.74% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -42.34% | -66.45% | +24.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -82.30% | -66.45% | -15.85% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.51% | -65.55% | +49.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -33.17% | -15.07% | -18.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.16% | 25.99% | -17.83% |
Volatility
MCB vs. CCB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Metropolitan Bank Holding Corp. (MCB) is 11.64%, while Coastal Financial Corporation (CCB) has a volatility of 57.84%. This indicates that MCB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CCB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MCB | CCB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.64% | 57.84% | -46.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.11% | 64.65% | -42.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.14% | 59.73% | -25.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 58.85% | 42.94% | +15.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 56.00% | 50.13% | +5.87% |
Dividends
MCB vs. CCB - Dividend Comparison
MCB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, while CCB has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
CCB Coastal Financial Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MCB Metropolitan Bank Holding Corp. | 1.03% | 0.39% |
Financials
MCB vs. CCB - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Metropolitan Bank Holding Corp. and Coastal Financial Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
MCB and CCB have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CCB has higher volatility (57.84%) compared to MCB (11.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MCB dropped -82.30% vs CCB's -66.45%.
MCB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.96 vs -0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MCB and CCB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer