PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FUNC vs. BKNG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

FUNC vs. BKNG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First United Corporation (FUNC) and Booking Holdings Inc. (BKNG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FUNC achieves a 14.39% return, which is significantly higher than BKNG's -21.30% return. Over the past 10 years, FUNC has outperformed BKNG with an annualized return of 18.58%, while BKNG has yielded a comparatively lower 13.27% annualized return.


FUNC

1D
-0.78%
1M
13.73%
YTD
14.39%
6M
7.63%
1Y
53.10%
3Y*
44.64%
5Y*
22.55%
10Y*
18.58%

BKNG

1D
-2.33%
1M
4.43%
YTD
-21.30%
6M
-22.06%
1Y
-20.25%
3Y*
17.75%
5Y*
13.78%
10Y*
13.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FUNC vs. BKNG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FUNC
First United Corporation
14.39%14.29%48.25%25.24%8.04%25.12%-33.27%54.43%-7.20%9.09%
BKNG
Booking Holdings Inc.
-21.30%8.59%41.31%76.02%-16.00%7.72%8.45%19.24%-0.88%18.53%

Correlation

The correlation between FUNC and BKNG is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 1999

0.09

The correlation between FUNC and BKNG shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (all time) to 0.24 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

FUNC:

$5.20

BKNG:

$7.60

PE Ratio

FUNC:

8.13

BKNG:

22.08

PEG Ratio

FUNC:

0.68

BKNG:

0.33

PS Ratio

FUNC:

2.28

BKNG:

4.91

Total Revenue (TTM)

FUNC:

$90.53M

BKNG:

$27.69B

Gross Profit (TTM)

FUNC:

$63.80M

BKNG:

$22.16B

EBITDA (TTM)

FUNC:

$31.63M

BKNG:

$9.27B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FUNC vs. BKNG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FUNC
FUNC Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
FUNC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FUNC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
FUNC Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
FUNC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
FUNC Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

BKNG
BKNG Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
BKNG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BKNG Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
BKNG Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
BKNG Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
BKNG Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FUNC vs. BKNG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First United Corporation (FUNC) and Booking Holdings Inc. (BKNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FUNCBKNGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

0.91

+0.42

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.84

-0.61

+4.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.19

-1.13

+9.33

FUNC vs. BKNG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FUNC Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which is higher than the BKNG Sharpe Ratio of -0.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FUNC and BKNG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FUNC vs. BKNG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FUNC drawdown since its inception was -85.84%, smaller than the maximum BKNG drawdown of -99.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FUNC and BKNG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FUNCBKNGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-85.84%

-99.32%

+13.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.90%

-33.35%

+19.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-37.76%

-33.35%

-4.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.90%

-39.53%

-5.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-54.91%

-47.77%

-7.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.78%

-27.27%

+26.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-30.94%

-47.03%

+16.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.50%

17.89%

-11.39%

Volatility

FUNC vs. BKNG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First United Corporation (FUNC) is 7.94%, while Booking Holdings Inc. (BKNG) has a volatility of 9.25%. This indicates that FUNC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BKNG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FUNCBKNGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.94%

9.25%

-1.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.27%

27.43%

-9.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.21%

32.54%

-3.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.69%

32.40%

-2.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.76%

32.52%

+0.24%

Dividends

FUNC vs. BKNG - Dividend Comparison

FUNC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.37%, more than BKNG's 0.96% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
BKNG
Booking Holdings Inc.
0.96%0.72%0.70%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FUNC
First United Corporation
2.37%2.46%2.43%3.32%3.05%3.09%3.35%1.66%1.70%

Financials

FUNC vs. BKNG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between First United Corporation and Booking Holdings Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B202220232024202520260
5.53B
(FUNC) Total Revenue
(BKNG) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


FUNC and BKNG have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BKNG has higher volatility (9.25%) compared to FUNC (7.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FUNC dropped -85.84% vs BKNG's -99.32%.

FUNC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs -0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FUNC and BKNG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer