PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CCB vs. CBFV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CCB vs. CBFV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Coastal Financial Corporation (CCB) and CB Financial Services, Inc. (CBFV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CCB achieves a -37.11% return, which is significantly lower than CBFV's 3.00% return.


CCB

1D
0.57%
1M
3.45%
YTD
-37.11%
6M
-38.97%
1Y
-16.25%
3Y*
24.32%
5Y*
18.60%
10Y*

CBFV

1D
-4.46%
1M
2.49%
YTD
3.00%
6M
-1.19%
1Y
32.72%
3Y*
24.82%
5Y*
14.50%
10Y*
8.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CCB vs. CBFV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
CCB
Coastal Financial Corporation
-37.11%34.95%91.20%-6.54%-6.12%141.05%27.50%8.14%-6.28%
CBFV
CB Financial Services, Inc.
3.00%25.99%25.11%16.48%-7.16%25.67%-30.79%26.28%-26.49%

Correlation

The correlation between CCB and CBFV is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.24

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 18, 2018

0.19

The correlation between CCB and CBFV shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (5 years) to 0.32 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

CCB:

$4.25

CBFV:

$1.29

PE Ratio

CCB:

16.94

CBFV:

27.40

PS Ratio

CCB:

1.98

CBFV:

2.66

Total Revenue (TTM)

CCB:

$422.59M

CBFV:

$70.63M

Gross Profit (TTM)

CCB:

$195.03M

CBFV:

$45.35M

EBITDA (TTM)

CCB:

$52.74M

CBFV:

$8.91M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CCB vs. CBFV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CCB
CCB Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
CCB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CCB Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
CCB Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
CCB Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
CCB Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

CBFV
CBFV Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
CBFV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CBFV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
CBFV Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
CBFV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
CBFV Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CCB vs. CBFV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Coastal Financial Corporation (CCB) and CB Financial Services, Inc. (CBFV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CCBCBFVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.96

1.22

-0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.38

3.31

-3.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.72

6.89

-7.61

CCB vs. CBFV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CCB Sharpe Ratio is -0.39, which is lower than the CBFV Sharpe Ratio of 1.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CCB and CBFV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CCB vs. CBFV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CCB drawdown since its inception was -50.22%, roughly equal to the maximum CBFV drawdown of -50.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCB and CBFV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CCBCBFVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.22%

-50.77%

+0.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-42.99%

-9.93%

-33.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-42.99%

-21.15%

-21.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.99%

-27.33%

-15.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-39.43%

-6.51%

-32.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.76%

-12.76%

-2.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

22.65%

4.76%

+17.89%

Volatility

CCB vs. CBFV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Coastal Financial Corporation (CCB) is 8.49%, while CB Financial Services, Inc. (CBFV) has a volatility of 9.57%. This indicates that CCB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CBFV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CCBCBFVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.49%

9.57%

-1.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.45%

19.48%

+10.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

41.46%

27.56%

+13.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

38.36%

26.19%

+12.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

47.84%

28.69%

+19.15%

Dividends

CCB vs. CBFV - Dividend Comparison

CCB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CBFV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.06%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CBFV
CB Financial Services, Inc.
3.06%2.93%3.50%4.20%4.48%3.99%4.80%3.19%3.59%2.93%3.40%3.71%
CCB
Coastal Financial Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

CCB vs. CBFV - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Coastal Financial Corporation and CB Financial Services, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M150.00M202220232024202520260
20.61M
(CCB) Total Revenue
(CBFV) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


CCB and CBFV have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CBFV has higher volatility (9.57%) compared to CCB (8.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CCB dropped -50.22% vs CBFV's -50.77%.

CBFV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.20 vs -0.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CCB and CBFV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer