CCB vs. NBHC

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

CCB (Coastal Financial Corporation) and NBHC (National Bank Holdings Corporation) are both stocks. Both operate in the Banks - Regional industry within the Financial Services sector. Over the past 5 years, CCB returned 7.00%/yr vs 6.94%/yr for NBHC. Their 0.51 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently.

Performance

CCB vs. NBHC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Coastal Financial Corporation (CCB) and National Bank Holdings Corporation (NBHC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CCB achieves a -64.23% return, which is significantly lower than NBHC's 15.40% return.

CCB

• 1D: 2.71%
• 1M: -47.68%
• 6M: -57.20%
• YTD: -64.23%
• 1Y: -55.64%
• 3Y*: -2.64%
• 5Y*: 7.00%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 12.20%

NBHC

• 1D: 1.43%
• 1M: -2.97%
• 6M: 9.17%
• YTD: 15.40%
• 1Y: 23.60%
• 3Y*: 11.41%
• 5Y*: 6.94%
• 10Y*: 10.52%
• ALL TIME*: 7.65%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CCB Coastal Financial Corporation	$23.14M	$14.79M	$11.39M
NBHC National Bank Holdings Corporation	$24.41M	$18.73M	$17.13M

CCB vs. NBHC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
CCB Coastal Financial Corporation	-64.23%	34.95%	91.20%	-6.54%	-6.12%	141.05%	27.50%	8.14%	-6.28%
NBHC National Bank Holdings Corporation	15.40%	-8.94%	19.11%	-8.81%	-2.16%	37.06%	-4.50%	16.56%	-18.32%

Correlation

The correlation between CCB and NBHC is 0.57, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.57
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.61
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.62
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 18, 2018	0.51

The correlation between CCB and NBHC shifts across timeframes, from 0.51 (all time) to 0.62 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap CCB : $625.05M NBHC : $1.93B
EPS CCB : -$0.33 NBHC : $3.44
PS Ratio CCB : 0.98 NBHC : 1.96
Total Revenue (TTM) CCB : $485.14M NBHC : $631.82M
Gross Profit (TTM) CCB : $241.13M NBHC : $332.78M
EBITDA (TTM) CCB : $54.64M NBHC : $115.77M

Return for Risk

CCB vs. NBHC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CCB

CCB Risk / Return Rank: 6
CCB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
CCB Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
CCB Omega Ratio Rank: 5
CCB Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
CCB Martin Ratio Rank: 0

NBHC

NBHC Risk / Return Rank: 69
NBHC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
NBHC Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
NBHC Omega Ratio Rank: 64
NBHC Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
NBHC Martin Ratio Rank: 73

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CCB vs. NBHC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Coastal Financial Corporation (CCB) and National Bank Holdings Corporation (NBHC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CCB	NBHC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.96	0.79	-1.76
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.16	1.27	-2.43
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.78	1.16	-0.38
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.87	1.41	-2.28
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-2.21	3.33	-5.54

CCB vs. NBHC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CCB Sharpe Ratio is -0.96, which is lower than the NBHC Sharpe Ratio of 0.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CCB and NBHC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CCB vs. NBHC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CCB drawdown since its inception was -66.45%, which is greater than NBHC's maximum drawdown of -48.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCB and NBHC.

Drawdown Indicators

	CCB	NBHC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-66.45%	-48.43%	-18.02%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-66.45%	-14.41%	-52.04%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-66.45%	-32.94%	-33.51%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-66.45%	-43.64%	-22.81%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-48.43%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-65.55%	-11.16%	-54.39%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.07%	-13.45%	-1.62%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	25.99%	6.11%	+19.88%

Volatility

CCB vs. NBHC - Volatility Comparison

Coastal Financial Corporation (CCB) has a higher volatility of 57.84% compared to National Bank Holdings Corporation (NBHC) at 7.70%. This indicates that CCB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NBHC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CCB	NBHC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	57.84%	7.70%	+50.14%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	64.65%	16.39%	+48.26%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	59.73%	25.73%	+34.00%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	42.94%	30.52%	+12.42%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	50.13%	31.43%	+18.70%

Dividends

CCB vs. NBHC - Dividend Comparison

CCB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NBHC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.89%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CCB Coastal Financial Corporation	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
NBHC National Bank Holdings Corporation	2.89%	3.16%	2.60%	2.80%	2.23%	1.98%	2.44%	2.13%	1.75%	1.05%	0.69%	0.94%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CCB and NBHC in my portfolio?

CCB and NBHC have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CCB or NBHC?

CCB has higher volatility (57.84%) compared to NBHC (7.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CCB dropped -66.45% vs NBHC's -48.43%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NBHC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.79 vs -0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.