PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BCS vs. UBS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BCS vs. UBS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Barclays PLC (BCS) and UBS Group AG (UBS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BCS achieves a 8.52% return, which is significantly lower than UBS's 11.85% return. Over the past 10 years, BCS has underperformed UBS with an annualized return of 15.34%, while UBS has yielded a comparatively higher 17.05% annualized return.


BCS

1D
3.72%
1M
14.52%
YTD
8.52%
6M
9.03%
1Y
58.38%
3Y*
59.68%
5Y*
27.21%
10Y*
15.34%

UBS

1D
0.67%
1M
8.90%
YTD
11.85%
6M
11.56%
1Y
70.28%
3Y*
41.93%
5Y*
30.23%
10Y*
17.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BCS vs. UBS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BCS
Barclays PLC
8.52%96.49%76.26%6.01%-21.90%31.71%-12.84%31.90%-29.25%0.44%
UBS
UBS Group AG
11.85%60.21%2.03%67.65%5.92%27.93%17.99%7.15%-32.68%21.53%

Correlation

The correlation between BCS and UBS is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2014

0.68

The correlation between BCS and UBS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BCS:

$93.65B

UBS:

$206.83B

EPS

BCS:

£2.06

UBS:

$2.24

PE Ratio

BCS:

10.03

UBS:

22.86

PEG Ratio

BCS:

1.81

UBS:

0.41

PS Ratio

BCS:

2.52

UBS:

2.79

PB Ratio

BCS:

0.92

UBS:

2.23

Total Revenue (TTM)

BCS:

£28.57B

UBS:

$64.08B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BCS:

£26.96B

UBS:

$42.48B

EBITDA (TTM)

BCS:

£9.15B

UBS:

$11.15B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BCS vs. UBS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BCS
BCS Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
BCS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BCS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
BCS Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
BCS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
BCS Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

UBS
UBS Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
UBS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UBS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
UBS Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
UBS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
UBS Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BCS vs. UBS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Barclays PLC (BCS) and UBS Group AG (UBS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BCSUBSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.75

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.85

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.43

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.24

2.71

-0.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.33

7.24

-0.91

BCS vs. UBS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BCS Sharpe Ratio is 1.99, which is comparable to the UBS Sharpe Ratio of 2.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BCS and UBS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BCS vs. UBS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BCS drawdown since its inception was -94.36%, which is greater than UBS's maximum drawdown of -61.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCS and UBS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BCSUBSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-94.36%

-61.38%

-32.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.20%

-26.07%

-0.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.20%

-27.00%

+0.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-48.14%

-33.41%

-14.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.10%

-61.38%

-4.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.30%

0.00%

-19.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-38.41%

-19.18%

-19.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.25%

9.74%

-0.49%

Volatility

BCS vs. UBS - Volatility Comparison

Barclays PLC (BCS) has a higher volatility of 9.29% compared to UBS Group AG (UBS) at 6.82%. This indicates that BCS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UBS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BCSUBSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.29%

6.82%

+2.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.22%

20.07%

+4.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.47%

25.82%

+3.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.05%

30.37%

+3.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.60%

30.33%

+7.27%

Dividends

BCS vs. UBS - Dividend Comparison

BCS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.71%, more than UBS's 1.08% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BCS
Barclays PLC
1.71%1.70%3.13%4.86%4.18%1.61%3.91%3.68%3.21%1.37%2.26%2.95%
UBS
UBS Group AG
1.08%2.92%3.46%0.89%1.34%1.04%3.87%5.48%0.00%3.30%5.42%3.87%

Financials

BCS vs. UBS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Barclays PLC and UBS Group AG. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


5.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B20222023202420252026
8.16B
20.20B
(BCS) Total Revenue
(UBS) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. BCS values in GBP, UBS values in USD

BCS vs. UBS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Barclays PLC and UBS Group AG over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
100.0%
71.8%
Portfolio components
BCS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Barclays PLC reported a gross profit of 8.16B and revenue of 8.16B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.

UBS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, UBS Group AG reported a gross profit of 14.51B and revenue of 20.20B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 71.8%.

BCS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Barclays PLC reported an operating income of 2.81B and revenue of 8.16B, resulting in an operating margin of 34.5%.

UBS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, UBS Group AG reported an operating income of 3.77B and revenue of 20.20B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.7%.

BCS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Barclays PLC reported a net income of 2.18B and revenue of 8.16B, resulting in a net margin of 26.7%.

UBS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, UBS Group AG reported a net income of 2.98B and revenue of 20.20B, resulting in a net margin of 14.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


BCS and UBS have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BCS has higher volatility (9.29%) compared to UBS (6.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BCS dropped -94.36% vs UBS's -61.38%.

UBS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.74 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BCS and UBS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer