PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
BCS vs. BAC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between BCS and BAC is 0.40, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.4

Performance

BCS vs. BAC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Barclays PLC (BCS) and Bank of America Corporation (BAC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

1,000.00%1,200.00%1,400.00%1,600.00%1,800.00%2,000.00%2,200.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
1,216.03%
2,031.76%
BCS
BAC

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

BCS:

2.52

BAC:

1.64

Sortino Ratio

BCS:

3.19

BAC:

2.50

Omega Ratio

BCS:

1.42

BAC:

1.30

Calmar Ratio

BCS:

0.99

BAC:

1.16

Martin Ratio

BCS:

18.25

BAC:

6.69

Ulcer Index

BCS:

4.29%

BAC:

5.58%

Daily Std Dev

BCS:

31.00%

BAC:

22.71%

Max Drawdown

BCS:

-94.39%

BAC:

-93.45%

Current Drawdown

BCS:

-60.45%

BAC:

-7.02%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BCS:

$49.21B

BAC:

$345.66B

EPS

BCS:

$1.41

BAC:

$2.76

PE Ratio

BCS:

9.70

BAC:

16.32

PEG Ratio

BCS:

1.24

BAC:

2.00

Total Revenue (TTM)

BCS:

$26.15B

BAC:

$97.40B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BCS:

$26.15B

BAC:

$58.68B

EBITDA (TTM)

BCS:

-$1.08B

BAC:

$42.54B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BCS achieves a 73.50% return, which is significantly higher than BAC's 34.52% return. Over the past 10 years, BCS has underperformed BAC with an annualized return of 1.73%, while BAC has yielded a comparatively higher 11.77% annualized return.


BCS

YTD

73.50%

1M

-1.21%

6M

26.88%

1Y

76.18%

5Y*

11.09%

10Y*

1.73%

BAC

YTD

34.52%

1M

-3.57%

6M

13.21%

1Y

36.43%

5Y*

7.44%

10Y*

11.77%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

BCS vs. BAC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Barclays PLC (BCS) and Bank of America Corporation (BAC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for BCS, currently valued at 2.52, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.002.521.64
The chart of Sortino ratio for BCS, currently valued at 3.19, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.003.192.50
The chart of Omega ratio for BCS, currently valued at 1.42, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.421.30
The chart of Calmar ratio for BCS, currently valued at 0.99, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.991.16
The chart of Martin ratio for BCS, currently valued at 18.25, compared to the broader market-5.000.005.0010.0015.0020.0025.0018.256.69
BCS
BAC

The current BCS Sharpe Ratio is 2.52, which is higher than the BAC Sharpe Ratio of 1.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BCS and BAC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.001.502.002.503.003.50JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
2.52
1.64
BCS
BAC

Dividends

BCS vs. BAC - Dividend Comparison

BCS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.18%, more than BAC's 2.26% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
BCS
Barclays PLC
3.18%4.87%4.17%1.60%3.90%3.72%3.21%1.39%2.25%3.09%2.87%2.09%
BAC
Bank of America Corporation
2.26%2.73%2.60%1.75%2.38%1.87%2.19%1.32%1.13%1.19%0.67%0.26%

Drawdowns

BCS vs. BAC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BCS drawdown since its inception was -94.39%, roughly equal to the maximum BAC drawdown of -93.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCS and BAC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-70.00%-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-60.45%
-7.02%
BCS
BAC

Volatility

BCS vs. BAC - Volatility Comparison

Barclays PLC (BCS) has a higher volatility of 7.44% compared to Bank of America Corporation (BAC) at 5.47%. This indicates that BCS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BAC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
7.44%
5.47%
BCS
BAC

Financials

BCS vs. BAC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Barclays PLC and Bank of America Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2024 PortfoliosLab