PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
BCS vs. BAC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


BCSBAC
YTD Return75.35%38.90%
1Y Return105.93%70.18%
3Y Return (Ann)12.25%1.87%
5Y Return (Ann)12.70%9.72%
10Y Return (Ann)2.22%12.67%
Sharpe Ratio3.352.92
Sortino Ratio3.914.25
Omega Ratio1.531.52
Calmar Ratio1.311.70
Martin Ratio24.7912.84
Ulcer Index4.27%5.48%
Daily Std Dev31.66%24.12%
Max Drawdown-94.39%-93.45%
Current Drawdown-60.02%-0.48%

Fundamentals


BCSBAC
Market Cap$48.67B$351.88B
EPS$1.44$2.76
PE Ratio9.1816.62
PEG Ratio1.192.06
Total Revenue (TTM)$26.37B$95.85B
Gross Profit (TTM)$19.82B$94.17B
EBITDA (TTM)-$672.00M$18.44B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.4

The correlation between BCS and BAC is 0.40, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

BCS vs. BAC - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, BCS achieves a 75.35% return, which is significantly higher than BAC's 38.90% return. Over the past 10 years, BCS has underperformed BAC with an annualized return of 2.22%, while BAC has yielded a comparatively higher 12.67% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
22.38%
19.35%
BCS
BAC

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

BCS vs. BAC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Barclays PLC (BCS) and Bank of America Corporation (BAC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BCS
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for BCS, currently valued at 3.35, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.003.35
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for BCS, currently valued at 3.91, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.003.91
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for BCS, currently valued at 1.53, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.53
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for BCS, currently valued at 1.31, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.31
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for BCS, currently valued at 24.79, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0024.79
BAC
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for BAC, currently valued at 2.92, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.92
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for BAC, currently valued at 4.25, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.004.25
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for BAC, currently valued at 1.52, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.52
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for BAC, currently valued at 1.70, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.70
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for BAC, currently valued at 12.84, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0012.84

BCS vs. BAC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BCS Sharpe Ratio is 3.35, which is comparable to the BAC Sharpe Ratio of 2.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BCS and BAC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.001.502.002.503.003.50JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
3.35
2.92
BCS
BAC

Dividends

BCS vs. BAC - Dividend Comparison

BCS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.15%, more than BAC's 2.14% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
BCS
Barclays PLC
3.15%4.87%4.17%1.60%3.90%3.72%3.21%1.39%2.25%3.09%2.87%2.09%
BAC
Bank of America Corporation
2.14%2.73%2.60%1.75%2.38%1.87%2.19%1.32%1.13%1.19%0.67%0.26%

Drawdowns

BCS vs. BAC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BCS drawdown since its inception was -94.39%, roughly equal to the maximum BAC drawdown of -93.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCS and BAC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-70.00%-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-60.02%
-0.48%
BCS
BAC

Volatility

BCS vs. BAC - Volatility Comparison

Barclays PLC (BCS) has a higher volatility of 11.53% compared to Bank of America Corporation (BAC) at 9.55%. This indicates that BCS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BAC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
11.53%
9.55%
BCS
BAC

Financials

BCS vs. BAC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Barclays PLC and Bank of America Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items