PortfoliosLab logo
BCS vs. BAC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between BCS and BAC is 0.45, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

BCS vs. BAC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Barclays PLC (BCS) and Bank of America Corporation (BAC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

BCS:

1.79

BAC:

0.58

Sortino Ratio

BCS:

2.23

BAC:

1.05

Omega Ratio

BCS:

1.30

BAC:

1.15

Calmar Ratio

BCS:

0.91

BAC:

0.69

Martin Ratio

BCS:

12.93

BAC:

2.07

Ulcer Index

BCS:

4.84%

BAC:

9.18%

Daily Std Dev

BCS:

36.10%

BAC:

28.96%

Max Drawdown

BCS:

-94.39%

BAC:

-93.45%

Current Drawdown

BCS:

-46.25%

BAC:

-5.80%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BCS:

$62.00B

BAC:

$336.60B

EPS

BCS:

$1.99

BAC:

$3.37

PE Ratio

BCS:

8.75

BAC:

13.26

PEG Ratio

BCS:

1.37

BAC:

1.68

PS Ratio

BCS:

2.49

BAC:

3.45

PB Ratio

BCS:

0.62

BAC:

1.22

Total Revenue (TTM)

BCS:

$26.99B

BAC:

$123.06B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BCS:

$26.99B

BAC:

$78.30B

EBITDA (TTM)

BCS:

-$410.00M

BAC:

$65.96B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BCS achieves a 33.41% return, which is significantly higher than BAC's 2.33% return. Over the past 10 years, BCS has underperformed BAC with an annualized return of 3.55%, while BAC has yielded a comparatively higher 12.72% annualized return.


BCS

YTD

33.41%

1M

18.34%

6M

34.21%

1Y

61.47%

5Y*

31.82%

10Y*

3.55%

BAC

YTD

2.33%

1M

19.46%

6M

-3.27%

1Y

16.55%

5Y*

17.21%

10Y*

12.72%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

BCS vs. BAC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BCS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BCS is 9090
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BCS is 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BCS is 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BCS is 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BCS is 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BCS is 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

BAC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BAC is 7272
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BAC is 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BAC is 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BAC is 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BAC is 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BAC is 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

BCS vs. BAC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Barclays PLC (BCS) and Bank of America Corporation (BAC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current BCS Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is higher than the BAC Sharpe Ratio of 0.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BCS and BAC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

BCS vs. BAC - Dividend Comparison

BCS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.43%, more than BAC's 2.28% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
BCS
Barclays PLC
2.43%3.13%4.87%4.17%1.60%3.90%3.72%3.21%1.39%2.25%3.09%2.87%
BAC
Bank of America Corporation
2.28%2.28%2.73%2.60%1.75%2.38%1.87%2.19%1.32%1.13%1.19%0.67%

Drawdowns

BCS vs. BAC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BCS drawdown since its inception was -94.39%, roughly equal to the maximum BAC drawdown of -93.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCS and BAC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

BCS vs. BAC - Volatility Comparison

Barclays PLC (BCS) has a higher volatility of 7.30% compared to Bank of America Corporation (BAC) at 6.10%. This indicates that BCS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BAC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

BCS vs. BAC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Barclays PLC and Bank of America Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00B20.00B30.00B40.00B50.00B20212022202320242025
7.71B
46.99B
(BCS) Total Revenue
(BAC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

BCS vs. BAC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Barclays PLC and Bank of America Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%100.0%20212022202320242025
100.0%
58.2%
(BCS) Gross Margin
(BAC) Gross Margin
BCS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Barclays PLC reported a gross profit of 7.71B and revenue of 7.71B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.

BAC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Bank of America Corporation reported a gross profit of 27.37B and revenue of 46.99B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 58.2%.

BCS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Barclays PLC reported an operating income of 3.36B and revenue of 7.71B, resulting in an operating margin of 43.5%.

BAC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Bank of America Corporation reported an operating income of 9.60B and revenue of 46.99B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.4%.

BCS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Barclays PLC reported a net income of 2.10B and revenue of 7.71B, resulting in a net margin of 27.2%.

BAC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Bank of America Corporation reported a net income of 7.40B and revenue of 46.99B, resulting in a net margin of 15.7%.