PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BCS vs. SDS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BCS vs. SDS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Barclays PLC (BCS) and ProShares UltraShort S&P500 (SDS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BCS achieves a 8.52% return, which is significantly higher than SDS's -15.97% return. Over the past 10 years, BCS has outperformed SDS with an annualized return of 16.57%, while SDS has yielded a comparatively lower -27.09% annualized return.


BCS

1D
-0.69%
1M
7.15%
6M
7.75%
YTD
8.52%
1Y
51.32%
3Y*
54.63%
5Y*
27.45%
10Y*
16.57%

SDS

1D
1.56%
1M
-2.02%
6M
-12.91%
YTD
-15.97%
1Y
-27.87%
3Y*
-26.28%
5Y*
-20.64%
10Y*
-27.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BCS vs. SDS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BCS
Barclays PLC
8.52%96.49%76.26%6.01%-21.90%31.71%-12.84%31.90%-29.25%0.44%
SDS
ProShares UltraShort S&P500
-15.97%-26.79%-29.45%-31.53%30.69%-43.02%-49.91%-41.17%6.04%-32.02%

Correlation

The correlation between BCS and SDS is -0.63, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.53

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2006

-0.60

The correlation between BCS and SDS shifts across timeframes, from -0.63 (1 year) to -0.51 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BCS vs. SDS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BCS
BCS Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
BCS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BCS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
BCS Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
BCS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
BCS Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

SDS
SDS Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
SDS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SDS Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
SDS Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
SDS Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
SDS Martin Ratio Rank: 00
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BCS vs. SDS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Barclays PLC (BCS) and ProShares UltraShort S&P500 (SDS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BCSSDSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.86

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

0.82

+0.47

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.97

-0.92

+2.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.56

-1.65

+7.20

BCS vs. SDS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BCS Sharpe Ratio is 1.74, which is higher than the SDS Sharpe Ratio of -1.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BCS and SDS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BCS vs. SDS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BCS drawdown since its inception was -94.36%, smaller than the maximum SDS drawdown of -99.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCS and SDS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BCSSDSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-94.36%

-99.85%

+5.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.20%

-30.56%

+4.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.20%

-68.14%

+41.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-48.14%

-75.54%

+27.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.10%

-96.08%

+29.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.30%

-99.85%

+80.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-38.38%

-82.80%

+44.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.26%

16.94%

-7.68%

Volatility

BCS vs. SDS - Volatility Comparison

Barclays PLC (BCS) has a higher volatility of 9.43% compared to ProShares UltraShort S&P500 (SDS) at 8.20%. This indicates that BCS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SDS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BCSSDSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.43%

8.20%

+1.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.86%

19.87%

+4.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.65%

25.00%

+4.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.07%

33.86%

+0.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.33%

35.80%

+0.53%

Dividends

BCS vs. SDS - Dividend Comparison

BCS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.71%, less than SDS's 5.34% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BCS
Barclays PLC
1.71%1.70%3.13%4.86%4.18%1.61%3.91%3.68%3.21%1.37%2.26%2.95%
SDS
ProShares UltraShort S&P500
5.34%5.88%7.89%5.77%0.35%0.00%0.92%1.84%1.28%0.09%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BCS and SDS have a correlation of -0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BCS has higher volatility (9.43%) compared to SDS (8.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BCS dropped -94.36% vs SDS's -99.85%.

BCS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs -1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BCS and SDS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer