MBCE vs. LRNZ
MBCE (Monarch Blue Chips Elite Index ETF) and LRNZ (TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. MBCE is passively managed, while LRNZ is actively managed. With a 1.00 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. MBCE charges 1.14%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for LRNZ.
Performance
MBCE vs. LRNZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
MBCE
- 1D
- 1.38%
- 1M
- 0.54%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LRNZ
- 1D
- 2.65%
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MBCE vs. LRNZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
MBCE Monarch Blue Chips Elite Index ETF | -1.17% |
LRNZ TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF | -0.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between MBCE and LRNZ is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2026 | 1.00 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MBCE vs. LRNZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Monarch Blue Chips Elite Index ETF (MBCE) and TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF (LRNZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MBCE vs. LRNZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MBCE drawdown since its inception was -7.15%, which is greater than LRNZ's maximum drawdown of -3.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MBCE and LRNZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MBCE | LRNZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.15% | -3.01% | -4.14% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.70% | -0.44% | -5.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.47% | -1.39% | -2.08% |
Volatility
MBCE vs. LRNZ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MBCE | LRNZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 42.90% | 40.19% | +2.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.90% | 40.19% | +2.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 42.90% | 40.19% | +2.71% |
MBCE vs. LRNZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
MBCE has a 1.14% expense ratio, which is higher than LRNZ's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
MBCE vs. LRNZ - Dividend Comparison
Neither MBCE nor LRNZ has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 1.00, MBCE and LRNZ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, LRNZ is cheaper at 0.68% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LRNZ is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 1.14% for MBCE.
MBCE and LRNZ have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Kingsview Partners LLC and TrueMark Investments. Their fees differ too: 1.14% for MBCE and 0.68% for LRNZ.
Find the right allocation for MBCE and LRNZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer